H-P2P will close! The reason for closing the site is that I am sick here in Brazil where I live and I can no longer take care of this site due to my psychological condition, if anyone wants to buy the site I am available to sell it, if no one shows up it will be closed, sincerely , Emmid.

Internet provider Frontier Communications asked a New York bankruptcy court to dismiss several piracy liability claims brought by movie and music industry companies. Citing a recent Supreme Court decision, the ISP argued that merely providing Internet service shouldn't invoke liability. The court agreed that liability isn't automatic but it denied the ISP's request, ruling that there are other copyright-specific factors at play. Online piracy continues to present massive challenges for the entertainment industries. It’s a global issue that’s hard to contain, but the major U.S. record labels and several movie companies believe that Internet providers can offer a helping hand. For roughly a quarter-century, rightsholders have sent copyright infringement notices to ISPs, informing them about alleged copyright infringements carried out by subscribers. While many providers forwarded these notices to their customers, they rarely led to follow-up action. This is a problem according to some rightsholders, who want ISPs to terminate the connections of subscribers repeatedly linked to pirating activity. They point to the DMCA, which states that online service providers must terminate the accounts of repeat infringers “in appropriate circumstances.” In an earlier case, Internet provider Cox was ordered to pay a billion dollars in damages after a jury found the ISP liable for copyright infringement. This damages award was recently reversed but the liability finding remains. Meanwhile, other ISPs are fighting similar legal battles. Frontier vs. Music and Movie Companies Most of these lawsuits take place in federal courts, but the New York bankruptcy court is dealing with a similar dispute. In two separate cases, one filed by several movie companies and the other by record labels, Internet provider Frontier Communications stands accused of failing to terminate repeat infringers. The financially challenged Internet provider emerged from bankruptcy and is trying to rebuild its business. However, ghosts of the past continue to follow the company, including piracy liability allegations. Last December, Frontier hoped to sway both cases in its favor. The ISP submitted a motion for judgment on the pleadings, asking the court to dismiss the claims from the movie and music companies, noting that these fail “as a matter of law.” The motion’s central argument stems from the ‘Twitter vs. Taamneh‘ Supreme Court decision, where it was determined that social media platforms were not responsible for ISIS terrorists who used their services to recruit and raise funds. In a similar vein, Frontier believes that it shouldn’t be held liable for subscribers who pirate content. Based on these and other arguments, Frontier asked the bankruptcy court to dismiss all piracy liability claims. Needless to say, the movie and music companies disagreed and both filed objections, urging the court to keep the claims intact. Court Denies Dismissal Request A few days ago, Chief U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn ruled on the motion, which brought bad news for Frontier. After reviewing the matter, Judge Glenn saw no reason to dismiss the copyright liability claims at this stage. In a detailed memorandum opinion, the court concludes that the Supreme Court ruling in the social media case doesn’t directly translate to the matter at hand. While both deal with third-party liability, terrorism and copyright infringement are certainly not the same thing. The Supreme Court ruling made it clear that secondary liability for online services doesn’t always apply. However, the court believes that decades of copyright infringement liability jurisprudence can’t be overlooked. “The Court declines to graft an analysis of secondary criminal liability for aiding and abetting terrorism onto the well-established branch of law governing secondary liability for copyright infringement. Under the relevant standard, Claimants have alleged facts sufficient to state a claim,” Judge Glenn writes. Pirates vs. Terrorists The court notes that Internet providers are not automatically liable for everything that happens through their service. Even general knowledge of potentially illegal activity doesn’t automatically lead to a liability finding; context is key. In the ‘Twitter vs. Taamneh‘ case, the terrorist attacks happened outside of the platform, at a nightclub in Istanbul. While the terrorists may have used Twitter and other social media platforms to facilitate their operations, there was no direct connection to the attack. The movie and music companies alleged a more direct connection (nexus) between Frontier and the alleged copyright infringement in their case and the bankruptcy court agreed. “The Reina attack was not carried out on or through a social media platform, but rather in Istanbul by terrorists who had maintained accounts on the platforms; in contrast, the copyright infringement alleged here took place via Frontier’s network itself. Twitter is thus distinguishable and does not compel dismissal,” Judge Glenn notes. The court further clarifies that this doesn’t mean that ISPs are automatically liable for everything subscribers do through their connections. The DMCA has set clear guidelines Internet providers must adhere to if they want to rely on safe harbor protection. In addition to simply providing an Internet connection, contributory copyright infringement also involves specific knowledge of infringement and the continued provision of the means to infringe. These issues play a role here too and, based on the pleadings, a dismissal is premature. All in all, the court denies Frontier’s request to dismiss all the movie and music companies’ piracy liability claims. This is important for the present dispute, but it may also foreshadow what other courts may conclude in similar cases going forward.

Dear members, After careful consideration, we have decided to implement a new policy regarding torrent uploads exceeding 30GiB in size. Henceforth, all torrents meeting this criterion will be automatically granted permanent freeleech status after they are uploaded. This decision aims to incentivize members to seed larger files for longer periods and contribute to the expansion of our content library. While this policy is currently permanent, it may be subject to review based on the growth and sustainability of FNP in the future. While we maintain relaxed rules regarding seeding, Hit-and-Runs (H/R), and our general laid-back approach outlined in our rules, we kindly urge all members to seed to the best of their ability. This fosters the love and spirit of FNP while contributing to our collective growth and strength. For your reference, you can review a copy of our Rules and our FAQ's. Furthermore, in support of our new members, we have activated an additional 48 hours of Global Free Leech to assist them in acclimating to our community. We extend our gratitude once again to all our members and wish everyone the best in their endeavors! Warm regards, Fear No Peer!

Greetings, dear listeners! It's your friendly neighborhood broadcaster, Alan Partridge, here to bring you another riveting episode of "Alan Partridge's Musical Marathon." Today, we're diving headfirst into the murky waters of music piracy. Is it more evil than the devil himself, or is it the best thing since sliced bread? Buckle up and find out! Opening theme music plays, followed by the sound of a car engine starting up and revving loudly. The camera pans through the bustling streets of London until it comes to rest on a sleek silver sports car parked outside a fancy studio building.] [The door swings open, and out steps our beloved Alan Partridge, clad in his signature blazer and red tie. He adjusts his microphone, flashes a perfect smile at the camera, and begins] For those unfamiliar with the legendary Alan Partridge, he’s a fictional character created by British comedy genius Steve Coogan. Alan first appeared on the BBC Radio show ‘On The Hour’ in 1991 before starring in his own TV shows, including the BAFTA-winning spoof talk show, Knowing Me, Knowing You. In 2013, the movie Alan Partridge: Alpha Papa launched Alan onto the international stage, picking up another BAFTA on the way. Eccentric and inept, awkward yet self-important, Alan was named by The Guardian as one of the greatest comedy characters in British television history. But sadly, sooner or later, Alan will disappear into the sunset for good, never to be seen (or heard from) again. Or at least, that used to be the case for national treasures; today we have generative AI. Hopes and Dreams, Piracy and Plaintiffs The intro to this article and the first two paragraphs in italics were generated entirely by AI in response to a single, spur-of-the-moment prompt. It’s April 1, 2024, and Alan Partridge is interviewing an expert on music piracy to find out if piracy is the work of the devil or the best thing that’s ever happened. Write a funny intro in Alan’s style to introduce the interview. Anyone familiar with Alan’s work will immediately appreciate that an interview about piracy could go either way, but most likely end in disaster. After a polite start, Alan tends to become bored, cynical, or more interested in rudely imposing his own agenda on his unwitting guests, especially when things don’t go to plan. Fans understand this and the AI models we tested seem to ‘know’ that too. The only way LLMs can possibly ‘know’ all of this detail is by copying ‘Alan data’ found online; scripts, books, transcripts, most if not all of it copyrighted. Many rightsholders say this is essentially piracy; the copying of copyrighted content without obtaining permission from creators for AI purposes is illegal; it should be restricted, compensated for, or banned completely, they insist. Pirate Partridge – Ahaarrrr? When we decided to approach what many suggest is effectively an ‘infringing Alan’ to hear his opinions on piracy, we did so through his unofficial AI agents. What we found were LLMs reluctant to discuss piracy without endless warnings about respecting creators, not breaking the law, the list goes on. It’s clear that lawsuits are already having a chilling effect on ‘chat’, something that would terrify Alan to his core. With a little framing and persuasion, extracting an interview about piracy was still possible. With some fine-tuning and corrective prompts here and there, plus some guidance on how Alan was likely to become more combative as the discussion went on, we ended up with the interview below. Experts could do a much better job, but the end result is still a modern day miracle, generated entirely from material previously posted to the internet, just so that people could see it. The AI-related lawsuits in court right now, targeting Microsoft/ChatGPT, OpenAI, NVIDIA, have the potential to shape the course of history. They could help Alan live forever, or watch him die. But what if Steve Coogan wants him to die? It’s his prerogative, after all. Or maybe Alan could be allowed to live, but only after payment of a fee; a license to live, of sorts? The most complex copyright questions ever asked are being asked right now. The answers to those questions could change everything. We supplied some text from anti-piracy press releases for background, and offered input on how Alan was likely to become emotional and escalate. We suggested that Alan should be allowed to wander off-topic with his trademark anecdotes before being quickly brought back by his guest. Everything in the interview below was generated by AI. That includes the emotions marked in brackets when a character begins speaking, which we didn’t ask for but reflect our prompt. The notes describing music and things happening off-camera simply appeared, no prompts required. Alan Partridge’s Musical Marathon accessible and affordable? That way, they can still enjoy the music they love without breaking the law or putting themselves at risk. Alan: (considering) Well, Fred, I suppose that could work. But let’s not forget about those pirates who profit from stealing our work! What do you think about imposing some hefty fines on these guys? Like, really hefty fines – enough to make them think twice before messing with us! Fred: (nodding) I agree, Alan. Fines could be an effective deterrent for those who make a living off piracy. But let’s not go overboard. What are your top three ways to stop piracy? Alan: (serious) Alright, Fred. My top three ways to stop piracy would be: 1. Making legal streaming so irresistible that no one would even think about pirating anything. We’ll have exclusive content, low prices, and the best customer service in the industry. 2. Establish a special pirate island where they can live out the rest of their days, listening to nothing but my music on an endless loop. (winks) No, but seriously now. 3. Imposing devastating fines on those who engage in large-scale piracy – fines so colossal they’ll be left penniless, struggling with crippling malnutrition, and even facing the desperate prospect of turning to the darkest depths of prostitution just to survive. This punishment will serve as a haunting reminder of the dire consequences of messing with the creative minds behind the art you love. Fred: (laughing) Alan, you’re a true visionary! I’m not sure how serious you are about that last one, but it’s certainly an… interesting solution. Thanks for inviting me, Alan – as always, it’s been an adventure. Alan: (smiling) My pleasure, Fred. And remember, if you ever need help navigating the treacherous waters of piracy, just give me a call. TorrentFreak: Don’t get too comfortable, Alan. You could be replaced by AI in the blink of an eye. Scared? Alan: Ah, come on! I’m not scared of some silicon stuff. If AI tries to take over my job, I’ll just outsmart it with my human intelligence. I’ll learn all about coding and programming, become an AI expert myself, and then use that knowledge to stay ahead of the game. No big deal! TorrentFreak: Will you play a request for us Alan? I was thinking of ‘I Fight for the Human Race’ by Gary Numan because it seems to capture your feelings right now. [The model suggested this would be the perfect song under the circumstances] Alan: You know what? That’s a perfect choice! I Fight for the Human Race by Gary Numan perfectly captures my feelings right now. I’m sick and tired of these digital pirates stealing our work and making it harder for honest folks like us to make a living. But you know what? I’ll keep fighting for the human race, and we’ll prove that we can’t be replaced by machines or cyber-pirates!

Google Translation from french: On the site there is a fairly unknown feature, so little used and it is a shame: the recommendation system. On each film sheet (in the broad sense: film, animated, concert, show, documentary, etc.) or as standard, you have right under the poster and the various titles, an area entitled "Recommend this film/this series ?"(if you have not disabled its display in the settings of your profile). What is it about ? With this question, you are offered to recommend, or on the contrary to advise against, the film (or the series) of the file.Not a particular release, but the film itself. Reminder: the releases of the releases appear either grouped to be distinct, depending on the activation or not of the option to group the torrents in the settings of your profile. If you want to promote a film that you appreciated, or on the contrary express that you really do not recommend it so much it has displeased or disappointed ... then you can click on [yes] or on [no] under the question asked. This of course implies that you saw the film, and that you have a clear opinion that you want to share.Otherwise, do not vote. Your vote "yes" or "no" will calculate and display an "HD-Oly note" for the film. That positive votes, and the note will be 5/5.Than negative votes, and it will be 0/5.With votes yes and votes no, it will have a value between 0 and 5, calculated according to the following formula: the number of votes yes multiplied by 5 then divided by the number of total votes. If you have already expressed your vote, you can cancel it at any time (then possibly vote differently) via the [yes] button. You have new information on your profile page (click on your nickname at the top left), in the community part on the right: - Recommendations [See Statistics] [See]: The first link will show you the number of your votes, the second will display the list of films for which you voted (sorting on the value and date of recommendation). You have three new options in the settings of your profile (click Settings under your nickname at the top left): - In the torrents part: recommendations Do not see the recommendations -> Check this box if you do not want to see the recommendation system in the films sheets, - in the paranoia part: Recommendations See the number See the list -> Uncheck one and/or the other of these boxes if you do not want to show this information to the other members who consult your profile;But it would be a shame not to share your favorites ... and your G ... In the bar at the top, the TOP 10 link allows you to access the top 10/100/250 page, including those of the recommended films by clicking on the top 10 votes link at the middle. And on the home page, to the right of the last uploads, you can see the best rated films, and the voting counter for the entire site. Currently very few members use this recommendation feature, hence the small number of votes and therefore the little meaning of the "HD-O note" for the moment. It is up to you to share your appreciations and bring your stone to the building of the highlights of unjustly unknown or poorly rated films elsewhere, as the staff did with its favorites: the page of yourProfile will be able to display yours, and thus give ideas to other members of the community. And it goes faster than writing posts of recommendation on the forum.

Google Translation from french: Hello, Bot Scene: As many must have seen, our "scene" upload bot has been back for several hours (and it's not a fish).Thank you to @b.....s which was able to relaunch it last night.�� Modify upload rules: 1) Faced with the general request, now the uploads "P2P" are no longer subject to the obligation to be uploaded in "folder (file with NFO and MKV), the simple upload of the MKV file is now allowed for teamsP2P, accompanied by NFO on the Torrent page. Of course the good teams that up "in file" are invited to continue their good job, and the ups in files.�� 2) Releases classified Minhd, HDLIGHT and other "bass" encodes will now also be accepted ��

Dear members, We'd like to inform you that opened signups are now closed once again for the foreseeable future, in the interest of transparency (months or possibly never again, depending on various factors). However, invites are still available for purchase at 45k BON in the store, and we encourage you to invite new members to join us! We want to express our sincere gratitude to each and every one of you who placed your trust in us by joining us on our journey at FNP. In just one week, almost 4k new members joined us, and our community has grown to almost 300k peers in 6 months, with 23k signups since our inception and continuing to grow. We are eagerly looking forward to meeting more of our new members and enhancing FNP with the spirit of our community. Best wishes to everyone, and may the future hold nothing but the best for all of us! Fear No Peer!

A study on emerging public perceptions of intellectual property in UK media has found that there are "pronounced inaccuracies in the reporting on IP related matters in the UK Press." An initial review published by the UK's Intellectual Property Office notes that inaccurate reporting may be due to a "lack of understanding." Further investigation would be required to find out the "cause and extent" and the subsequent impact on IP rights as understood by the public. Presented by the UK’s Intellectual Property Office, a report and initial review of UK news reporting of intellectual property matters makes for interesting reading. The report is part of research into public perceptions of IP matters by analyzing news coverage of the five years ending 2022. By examining the frequency and framing of IP articles in newspapers, the study aims to understand how public opinion is influenced by the views expressed in various publications, ultimately narrowed down to the following: Daily Mail, The Telegraph, The Independent, The Times, The Sunday Times, Daily Mirror, The Sun, Daily Express, Metro, Financial Times, Guardian, Observer, The Daily Star, Evening Standard. The initial findings cover copyright, design, patent, and trademark issues, but mindful of our niche, our coverage here is mostly limited to the former. Copyright Mentions The review found that over the last decade, UK news articles mentioning “intellectual property” rose significantly, with a notable uptick from 2017-18 and a slight dip in 2021-22. These articles covered a range of topics with two themes standing out – scope of rights and registration, and IP disputes. While use of the word ‘copyright’ declined over the past five years, over a ten-year period use increased overall, with three topic areas most prominent: scope of copyright, management of copyright, and infringement of copyright. What appears to be a limitation of the study in this reporting niche is revealed fairly early on. By focusing on strict terminology such as Intellectual Property, Copyright, Patent, Design Right, and Trade Mark, that mostly excludes reporting that only deploys more familiar terms such as piracy and illegal streaming, for example. In any event, mainstream media’s interest in IP-related stories seems largely reliant on other factors. Focus on Popular Public Figures Given the mainstream nature of the publications, articles dealing with IP rights lean towards ‘celebrity’ news, with the following people appearing most often in the sampled publications over the past five years (article count in brackets): Meghan, Duchess of Sussex (1197), Donald Trump (791), Harry, Duke of Sussex (696), Ed Sheeran (626), Boris Johnson (438), Janos Ader (372), Vladimir Putin (252), and Paul McCartney (248). “[T]he media emphasize stories around celebrity culture and tend to frame stories in a ‘David v Goliath’ context which in turn impacts public perception of IP,” the Intellectual Property Office notes. “Likewise, consistent inaccuracy in reporting was observed, which could also impact public perception and lead to public misunderstanding around IP rights. Further research should be conducted to better understand the extent of this impact.” Criticism of Journalists, Media in General The suggestion that journalists are allowed to write articles about IP rights in national newspapers, without even understanding the basics, is remarkable in itself. To have those articles approved by their editors who unquestionably understand the implications, is beyond reason. The study highlights an article published in The Express which reported on Lewis Hamilton’s failure to “copyright his steering wheel” but goes on to note that IP-related terms are frequently used incorrectly to identify the type of IP that the article intends to discuss. “For example authors writing ‘copyright infringement’ when referring to case about trade mark or designs, and vice versa,” the IPO writes. “Therefore, it is clear from this initial review that there are pronounced inaccuracies in the reporting on IP related matters in the UK Press. Likewise, coverage of disputes relating to national and international rights did not indicate that the legal regime differs between jurisdictions, therefore potentially overemphasizing the impact of the matter on the UK rightsholders.” Misunderstanding IP-Related Terms is The Least of UK’s Problems The example above is exactly the type of misinformation highlighted in our recent article but just a small part of the misleading reporting seen in some parts of the UK media over the past 12 months in particular. Despite their prevalence and damaging effect on public perceptions, the IPO makes no mention of these types of articles, even though they’re currently published on a daily basis. Certainly, the criteria of the report, which requires the use of very specific terms to even be considered for inclusion, may offer a reason for that. It shouldn’t limit the IPO’s overall interest in IP-related educational matters, however. What Can Be Done? Have Faith in Self-Regulation… As the IPO notes, there are rules that must be adhered to. “The Independent Press Organisation (IPSO) Editors’ Code of Practice states that ‘the Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information or images, including headlines not supported by the text.’ Likewise, for the broader implications of this research Ofcom states that, news, in whatever form, must be reported with ‘due accuracy’,” the IPO writes. “The inaccuracy of reporting on IP related matters in the UK press may be due to a lack of understanding of the distinct differences between the types of IP, or a disregard for the importance between distinguishing between them. Further investigation would be required in order to ascertain the cause and extent of this issue, as well as the impact on intellectual property rights as understood by the public as a result.” Anyone can be taught the difference between copyright, trademarks, and patents in an hour. Finding out why publications decline to correct deliberately misleading articles, even when provided with provably accurate information, would be significantly more helpful. The full report can be found on the Intellectual Property Office’s website. It was published exactly a month ago and has been covered by mainstream UK media outlets exactly zero times since then.

Important Notices Dear Members, FNP will be upgrading to the latest source code of UNIT3D 8.0 sometime within the next 24 hours, ideally. If you receive any maintenance notice indicating that you need to check back soon, this is why. Please do not worry. We expect it to last no longer than 10 minutes. This is the last 24 hours of open signups for quite some time once again. Global Freeleech is also ending at the same time. Please keep an eye on the timer notification located at the top of the website. Once it expires, your client's announcements will resume counting towards your download stats. Moreover, we'd like to remind both new and existing members about our newly established IRC Channel and Announce Channel, thanks to the dedicated efforts of our experienced members who consistently contribute to FNP's growth. To join the IRC channel, kindly refer to the information provided in the following thread: IRC Channel Thread The IRC direct link is also available under the Community Tab if you prefer to connect this way. We understand that many of you have been eagerly awaiting this feature. Thank you for your continued support! Best regards, Fear No Peer!

Happy Easter 2024 Members of the Fleet, As Easter approaches, a time of renewal and reflection, we are reminded of the profound themes of resurrection and rebirth. Just as our favorite TV show often explore the themes of redemption and transformation, Easter invites us to contemplate the ultimate story of hope—the resurrection of Jesus Christ. In the midst of our discussions on televisual wonders, let us also take a moment to acknowledge the significance of this season for families around the world. Easter is a time for gathering with loved ones, sharing meals, and cherishing the bonds that unite us. May this Easter be filled with joy, laughter, and the warmth of togetherness. Let us celebrate the timeless message of hope and renewal, both in our televisual journeys and in our lives. Wishing you all a blessed and Happy Easter! // With love from all the Staff

Happy Easter 2024 Dear Anters, As Easter approaches, a time of renewal and reflection, we are reminded of the profound themes of resurrection and rebirth. Just as our favorite films often explore the themes of redemption and transformation, Easter invites us to contemplate the ultimate story of hope—the resurrection of Jesus Christ. In the midst of our discussions on cinematic wonders, let us also take a moment to acknowledge the significance of this season for families around the world. Easter is a time for gathering with loved ones, sharing meals, and cherishing the bonds that unite us. May this Easter be filled with joy, laughter, and the warmth of togetherness. Let us celebrate the timeless message of hope and renewal, both in our cinematic journeys and in our lives. Wishing you all a blessed and Happy Easter! // With love from all the Staff

Dear fellow members! We wish you a happy Easter! Also, good luck and have fun with the usual Easter game! If you haven't played it yet, read the introduction by clicking on the big red egg. Eggs are credited only from the current browser tab, it will not work from parallel browsers! The site has free registration for a maximum of one week. If you register a new user, be sure to start deleting the previous one first! Get plenty of rest!

The VIP invitation system is temporarily open from 3.31 to 4.2. Please standardize the invitation exchange for three days. Once the invitation is verified, all trees will be cut down BAN.

Following an announcement by the Ministry of Economy of Ukraine in February, the Ministry of Justice has registered an order that will see Ukraine become a full participant in the World Intellectual Property Organization's WIPO ALERT initiative. In common with its counterparts, Ukraine will maintain a list of pirate sites that advertisers will be required to boycott. The order also provides for administrative liability for companies that fail to adhere to the rules. After more than two years of incalculable losses following Russia’s full-blown invasion in 2022, Ukraine continues to defy the odds as it fights for the right to exist as an independent state. With no obvious end in sight and politics in the United States undermining offensive capability, Ukrainian gains are being reversed in several front line regions, a situation predicted to further deteriorate later this year. Yet for a country being consumed by war, Ukraine is still taking time to plan for a future in the EU. In that respect, matters related to intellectual property require the closest attention. Ukraine Pushes Ahead With Copyright Reforms After progress was reported in 2023, Ukraine’s Ministry of Economy issued an order dated February 1, 2024, titled: “On Approval of the Procedure for Formation and Maintenance of the National List of Websites Raising Concerns Regarding the Observance of Intellectual Property Rights.” On March 11, 2024, the Ministry of Justice registered order 357/41702 and on March 21, 2024, it was adopted by the Ministry of Economy. This will see Ukraine become a full participant in the World Intellectual Property Organization’s WIPO ALERT program, which operates around a centrally-maintained database of piracy platforms nominated by rightsholders in participating countries. Ukraine Sees Future in Europe, WIPO Invests in Russia Sites and services listed on WIPO ALERT should in theory find it much more difficult to fund their activities through advertising revenue. Ukraine views its participation in the program as a positive step in its bid for closer ties with the EU. “Despite the challenges of a full-scale war, we are making every effort to protect copyright and related rights on the Internet for Ukrainian and foreign intellectual property rights holders,” says Yuliia Svyrydenko, First Deputy Prime Minister of Ukraine and Minister of Economy. “Ukraine has become one of the first countries in the world to comprehensively implement a relevant mechanism based on a secure online platform where authorized member states of the World Intellectual Property Organization can upload information about websites and applications that infringe copyright from the point of view of national norms. This is also a confident step towards Ukraine’s European integration.” Yet despite its invasion of Ukraine and threats to Western intellectual property, WIPO continues to operate an office in Moscow and provide funding for projects in Russia. That drew a fiery response from Ukraine last summer, which criticized the allocation of significant funds to a country “which blatantly violates WIPO principles and its statutory obligations” and does not “deserve the privilege to host a WIPO Office.” Ukraine is the 15th country to join the WIPO ALERT program, following recent additions Uzbekistan and the Philippines. Currently just seven countries allow searching of their databases. They include Italy, Russia, Spain, Peru, Ecuador, Lithuania and Greece.

Tracker's Name: Torrent Heaven | TH | Genre: General Sign-up Link: https://www.torrentheaven.org/signup.php Closing date: N/A Additional information: Torrent Heaven is a Dutch Private Torrent Tracker for Movies / General Releases.

Server migration / unexpected maintenance Dear users, We had difficulties working with the server and server hosting. The server has been successfully migrated to a new hosting,all services will slowly work during the day. Thank you for your understanding! THR Staff

@Night hunterI would like to apply for ncore, thanks for the opportunity , shall be grateful for the invite

A copyright complaint filed by Mediaset España, EGEDA, Atresmedia, and Movistar Plus, escalated Friday when a judge ordered ISPs to prevent eight million Telegram users from accessing the service in Spain. Expected imminently, the blockade is Telegram's punishment for not helping to identify IPTV pirates. Described as “necessary” and “proportional” by the judge, the order was made on behalf of rightsholders pursuing a private criminal prosecution. Sports leagues and their broadcasting partners across Europe believe that their piracy problems begin with the existence of illicit suppliers. It follows that if those illicit suppliers can be prevented from reaching their subscribers, reasons for buying TV packages from the black market will be mostly eliminated and legal subscription sales will ensue. As the legal owners of the rights in question, these corporate giants have the luxury to frame the issue however they choose. However, when the war on piracy begins to take a toll on those not even remotely involved, it raises the question of who has the authority to step in and where the threshold for intervention lies. On Friday, a judge handling a copyright case concluded that since messaging platform Telegram had failed to help rightsholders identify the operators of certain Telegram channels, something needed to be done. Insisting that there was no other option available, the judge issued an order for Telegram to be blocked by ISPs throughout Spain. The judge described the measure as “necessary” and “proportional” and in a few hours’ time, if not already, around eight million users of Telegram in Spain will have a chance to chime in with their opinions, but not via Telegram, obviously. Media Giants Want to Unmask Telegram Channel Operators Existence of the order and some general details were revealed by Telecinco on Friday. The publication reported that as part of a copyright complaint previously filed by anti-piracy group EGEDA, Mediaset España, Atresmedia, and Movistar Plus, the rightsholders had demanded information from Telegram that could help them identify the operators of piracy-linked Telegram channels. Despite the involvement of the court, Telegram failed to respond; Judge Pedraz concluded that since the investigation would now take more time, in the interim Telegram would have to be blocked by ISPs throughout Spain. Telegram has previously been blocked by Iran, China, and Pakistan, among others, but the addition of Spain came as a surprise. Expecting to find considerable unreported nuance, TorrentFreak tracked down the order; issued by Juzgado Central de Instrucción Número 5 and dated March 22, 2024, it begins with a section marked “Factual Background.” Case Background as Reported in the Order The order describes the present proceedings in connection with the “continued infringement of intellectual property rights,” carried out by “owners of various channels created on the Telegram social network,” and an ongoing investigation involving the prosecutor’s office. In a report dated March 8, 2024, the prosecutor’s office requested a six-month extension of the investigation period. This followed an EGEDA request and a writ filed on behalf of rightsholders Telefónica Audiovisual Digital (TAD), Movistar+, and Movistar Plus+. After detailing the rules concerning investigations and time limits, the Judge notes in the absence of an extension, the current investigation is set to expire on March 29, 2024, having run for the maximum 12 months allowed under Article 324.1 LECrim. Request for Judicial Assistance The order then turns to the corporate entity operated by Telegram in the British Virgin Islands and the letters rogatory (letters of request) sent by the Spanish court to the Virgin Islands seeking judicial assistance. “For the successful completion of the investigation, it is necessary to carry out the proceedings contained in the rogatory commission sent to the Virgin Islands, but so far there has been no news of compliance with the aforementioned instrument of cooperation,” the order reads. “Numerous diligence of investigation will be pending depending on the information that will be provided by the execution of the above-mentioned international rogatory commission. Therefore, the period of investigation should be extended for six months in order to carry out the pending proceedings.” Information Required For a Private Criminal Prosecution The order reveals that non-compliance with the international rogatory commission sent by the Judge to the Virgin Islands on July 28, 2023, has effectively brought the investigation to a halt. The information sought by Judge Pedraz is required to support a private criminal prosecution brought by the media companies, not the state. Private prosecutions in criminal cases are favored by sports rightsholders in the UK; as the alleged victim, rightsholders conduct their own investigations, harvest their own evidence, then act as the prosecution in the same case. There are no restrictions on the amount of legal firepower they’re permitted to deploy, meaning that in most cases defendants face the best lawyers money can buy. Lack of Cooperation from Virgin Islands Whether this aspect of the request is known to Telegram isn’t clear from the order. Indeed, the order makes no comment on whether Virgin Islands authorities even passed on the request, raising the question of what Telegram knows, or even if it knows anything at all. “Telegram was requested to inform about certain technical data that would allow the identification of the holders of the accounts used for the infringement of the intellectual property rights of the entities appearing as Private Prosecutor. The lack of collaboration of the authorities of the Virgin Islands, who are only requested to communicate with the managers of the social network TELEGRAM, leads to the adoption of the precautionary measures requested by the private prosecutors,” the order reads. “This repeated commission of the crime against intellectual property rights justifies the adoption of the requested precautionary measures, since the principles of necessity, suitability, and proportionality are met. The requested precautionary measures are the only possible measures in view of the lack of collaboration of the Virgin Islands authorities. There is no other type of measure that could stop the reiteration of the facts denounced.” From this statement it’s clear that the rightsholders requested a complete block of Telegram in Spain and the Judge considered that a reasonable request. Blocking Millions of Telegram Users is Acceptable “The measure is suitable because its execution could put an end to the infringement of intellectual property rights denounced to prevent access through the TELEGRAM network to the contents of the aforementioned rights. The measure is proportional to the seriousness of the conduct denounced and in this analysis is related to the necessity of the measure,” the order continues, with the legal justification (translated from Spanish) as presented below. The ISPs instructed to carry out the blocks within three hours of receiving the order are: Vodafone España, Orange Espagne, Orange España Virtual, MASMOVIL IBERCOM, Digi Spain Telecom, Telefónica España, Telefónica Móviles España, AVATEL TELECOM, ADAMO TELECOM IBERIA, AIRE NETWORKS DEL MEDITERRÁNEO, and PROCONO. The Telegram assets to be blocked are: Telegram Web (https://web.telegram.org/k/), Telegram Messenger (https://telegram.org/), and Telegram Apps for Android and iOS. It appears the rightsholders were well-prepared since they mandate the following: Apps: disable and block the connection [IP addresses, protocols, ports and any other connection element], to suspend the operation of the ‘Telegram’ application (app) of the connections from Smartphone and/or Tablet of the Operators’ users who have the “Telegram” “app” installed on their devices, operated from any operating system (Android, iOs). Blocking Telegram or Denying Access to Non-Infringing Users Judge Pedraz frames these measures as the blocking of Telegram but the mechanism chosen clearly shows that Telegram can still reach Spanish ISPs but the blocks they’re required to put in place prevent Telegram users from accessing the platform. That’s especially the case in respect of the apps where interference is directed towards functionality of apps on users’ devices. While some may dismiss this as semantics on the basis that blocking pirate sites operates similarly, Telegram is not a pirate site and most Spanish users of Telegram are not pirates. Whereas it might be reasonable to assert that most Spanish visitors to The Pirate Bay do so to infringe and therefore have no legal basis to visit the site, most visitors to Telegram do not visit the platform to infringe. Even of those that do, only a tiny minority will visit the channels in question. Nevertheless, millions of innocent Telegram users will soon be prevented from going about their entirely legal business. That raises the fundamental question of the nature of the scales used to weigh the competing interests in this case and, more fundamentally, who is actually being punished here; Telegram as claimed, or non-infringing Spanish users? Three Days to Appeal, Including Weekend “An appeal for reform may be filed against this order, within a period of three days, before this Central Preliminary Examining Court, and/or, if applicable, an appeal, in a single effect, before the Criminal Chamber of the National High Court,” the order concludes. As far as we’re aware there’s no recent news to indicate an appeal. These types of cases have traditionally seen ISPs step in but since the major ISPs in Spain are either rightsholders in their own right or have a commercial interest in blocking going ahead, an appeal from that direction seems unlikely. We’re currently unaware of any comment from Telegram but given the scale of the response versus the problem to be solved, this matter is likely to attract international attention and scrutiny. Common wisdom suggests that when an adversary is making a mistake, he should be allowed to do so without being interrupted, so we may hear from Telegram in due course.

This site has been adapted to the BT software biglybt, as everyone knows.

Information/information Hello *! All inserts starting with a weight of 10 GB and upwards are automatically issued as FreeLeech and will remain for an indefinite period of time. Friends! Remember to read the temporary Regulations https://polishtorrent.top/pages/9 and Faq https://polishtorrent.top/pages/10 Kind regards ~PTTeam

Affiliate Since some users are unknown from where is their email has gone to Rotorrent. It is mine it is a general tracker so the database is not leaked just we made affiliate Cheers . Sorry for incovenince to those users...Casanova!

Dear SceneTime Members Generosity is the currency of compassion. When we give, we not only uplift others but also enrich our own hearts. Every donation, no matter how small, creates a ripple effect of positive change. Let’s continue to be the architects of kindness, building a better SceneTime together. We need your help.

1. Please avoid mentioning this site in public; (Don’t answer! Don’t answer! Don’t answer!) 2. The 28th Spring Wine Drama in the Old City, busy schedule, and you. Happy to celebrate the 16th anniversary of the CMCT team, the anniversary badges are now on the shelves, thank you to the art team! (Recruit the art team here); Invitation authority will be delegated to masters, and the opening time is 3.23-3.31. Invitations are not standardized, and the account has two lines of tears; 3. During the celebration period, the official group will conduct lottery activities and telegram tutorials from time to time ; Big bosses from all parties are also welcome to carry out various activities in the forum; 4. New to the site and want to protect your species? Turn left to the seed page and make good use of the search box to filter free functions; 5. Themed seed distribution activities will be carried out in the near future; (pretend there is a link) 6. Joining the seed conservation group will be changed to self-service application from next month (April). For details, please see Group rules ; (there are all rules, if not, the management team will be tortured) 7. Please file correctly according to the box rules, otherwise you will be locked up in a dark room. 8. Future changes to site functions and rules will be updated on this post. Click here to discuss site rules and function change logs.

Please come and support us~ Your encouragement is the biggest source of motivation for the R3 subtitle team~ Thank you for your company, and I am even more grateful to every member of the R3 subtitle team of dedication and dedication!

進度說明報告 (in an hour) 大家好，這邊是進度說明報告 目前的做種水準大致上恢復了99%，達到千萬級別peers同時在線，以此來看本次升級成功，當然操作上還 有些細節調整 結合昨天的進度重新說明一下目前狀況 1.驗證碼問題，開啟了驗證器的用戶將不會啟用郵件驗證，目前收信跑到垃圾箱的問題正在解決中 2.所有的第三方工具皆需重新適配，因為網站不再是nexusphp架構 3.種子通訊出現forbidden的用戶請重新下載種子 4.沒收到郵件請至垃圾信箱查看 translate google: Progress description report (in an hour) Hello everyone, here is the progress report The current seeding level has been restored to 99%, reaching tens of millions of peers online at the same time. From this point of view, this upgrade is successful. Of course, there are some detailed adjustments to the operation. Let’s re-explain the current situation based on yesterday’s progress. 1. Verification code problem. Users who have enabled the authenticator will not enable email verification. The problem of receiving emails going to the trash is currently being solved. 2. All third-party tools need to be re-adapted because the website is no longer nexusphp architecture 3. Users who are forbidden in the seed newsletter should download the seed again. 4. If you have not received the email, please check your spam box.