Why so few people use Deluge to download torrent?

[invitelove20]

This content is hidden until you react to this post and reload the page. Sign In or sign Up now to view this post.}

[invitelove20]

FYI, I tried many others transmission, uTorrent etc. 

[Cindra]

I use it because it has similar interface as utorrent.

[The Orgazoid]

Isnt Deluge mostly for Linux? If so i imagine that would be a big factor

[invitelove20]

@The Lich  it is available for Linux, macOS and Windows. That is why i am wondering when i see most of the peers are using other clients.

[Aninda Chakrabarty]

I use Deluge for all my Torrenting Stuff. It is not a problem for me though. I think others don't use this because don't know about this client. The website is also a bit complicated for non-technical users.  I also found myself in some trouble when I was trying to download the Fedora variant of the Installer.  The link for that particular file is also dead . At last I had to install the software for the Ubuntu Variant. 

[Clon]

on macos, Deluge wouldn't able to associate with magnet links, probably one of the reason.

[kalamaraki]

Maybe because it is mainly written in Python ? And Python as scripting language is not so fast as C / C++ or other compiled languages?

[Qatous]

Concerning seedboxes, rtorrent/ruTorrent is often the default installation so most people stick with that and don't even know that they can switch to other clients very easily.

[Voluntarist68]

Personally I've never tried it but feel comfortable with qbitorrent

[Yuzarsif07]

you cant add multiple torrents at once in deluge and that sucks

[Qatous]

Really ! I didn't know that. That maybe a strong no go for many users.

[Jiren]

because it is clean and ads free and does everything other torrent clients do.

[kushery]

I've used deluge but after trying rtorrent and transmission I switched.  Also some trackers won't allow deluge.

[decay]

I usually use transmission on windows, i now use qbitorrent its quite nice.

 

Never used deluge before, i will try to use it and feedback on this topic.

[Seeker37]

I don't like much because you can not add multiple torrents at one time. On my seedbox I use it for brand new torrents because it give me more upload then the other ones on the same seedbox.

[theglitch57]

Its great client but I like qbittorrent better so using that instead. 

[ntn888]

i used deluge when i was running windoze. now on linux and i believe transmission is installed by default.

[ntn888]

like to use rutorrnent on seedbox...

[peekaboo]

I use rutorrent + deluge.

the thing with deluge is, it crashes a lot :v . It can only accomodate 150-200 torrents. More than that would cause the app to slow and crash.

[HawkSparrow]

@invitelove20What is Deluge in your opinion better than for example qBitorrent?
I think the most mainstream clients all are pretty usable. Your post implies I'm missing out here.
I am aware of Deluge but I simply see no single reason to change. And if I would be rather curious to change to a more modern type of client.

Exatorrent for example

[lanacleto]

I used it years ago, but as other posters mentioned, when you have a high amount of torrents, it tends to get pretty sluggish. I have switched to qbittorrent and haven't looked back, it handles many torrents just fine.

[mrch]

@Voluntarist68 I use qbittorrent for a long time, too. Many private torrents website suggesting it.

[eric.]

Deluge is pretty decent but once you start piling on torrents, it starts to bog down. I also think the Deluge client runs much better on a Linux machine. There’s nothing wrong with Deluge but I usually maintain a large cache of seeding torrents. For that I use qbittorrent and Transmission (mainly Transmission 3.0). 

Edited May 2 by eric.

[SchwacherHeld]

I use before . but i think utorrent so much better