Jump to content

French Government Mulls Next Generation Anti-Piracy Measures

Guest BackFire

The last post in this topic was made more than 14 days ago. Only post in this topic if you have something valuable to add. Irrelevant posts are not allowed and you will be warned/banned for spamming old topics.

Recommended Posts

Guest BackFire


After pioneering one of the world’s first “three strikes” anti-piracy schemes the French are now turning their attention to other methods of obtaining unauthorized media. A new report just published by the Hadopi agency tackles the issue of streaming and direct download sites, which currently the organization is doing little about. No surprise that filtering, site blocking and domain seizures are being touted as possible solutions to this growing element of online piracy.

France’s graduated response system for dealing with online
file-sharing is not only famous around the world but also popular with
rightsholders. Those who are repeatedly monitored sharing copyrighted
material via peer-to-peer networks can expect a short series of warning
messages followed by a punishment.

Since the system only covers BitTorrent-like public transfers,
streaming and direct download sites are an attractive option for
Internet users wishing to avoid its clutches. But despite the Hadopi
anti-piracy agency
last year that there had been “a clear downward trend in illegal P2P
downloads” but no “massive transfer in forms of use to streaming
technologies or direct downloads”, there is still interest in these

French news outlet PCInpact
has directed TorrentFreak to a new report published by Hadopi which
proposes draconian messages to force streaming and Direct Download (DDL)
sites to comply with the law.

“Some Internet sites, streaming services and direct download sites
are specialized in the massive exploitation of illegal content from
which they make profits for their own benefit,” the Hadopi writes. “This
report, showing the state of the ecosystem of illegal streaming and
direct downloads, explores different ways to fight against the massive
exploitation of illegal content.”

The report, put together by Mireille Imbert-Quaretta, President at
the Commission for the Protection of Rights (Commission de Protection
des Droits), covers a wide range of anti-piracy techniques, some
well-trodden and others more fresh.

Hadopi has always claimed that “three strikes” is primarily an
educational effort and in combating streaming and direct downloads the
agency begins with the same approach. Internet users should be educated
about the “dangers” of obtaining media via these mechanisms through
warning messages sent by Hadopi.

Aiming to push the sites themselves towards YouTube-levels of
copyright compliance, Hadopi would like them to implement content
recognition and filtering technologies utilizing fingerprints supplied
by rightsholders. These systems could be used to completely remove
content or restrict user access based on location.

However, the report goes much further by suggesting that if site
operators refuse to sign filtering agreements with rightsholders and
illicit content repeatedly appears, they could be subjected to a
strikes-style system of their own.

“In the event that it would not be possible to reach an agreement
because of the apparent unwillingness of the platform hosting the
reported content [to comply with the law], the public authority may
decide to correct the behavior of the platform through an alert
procedure,” Numerama

Suggested punishments for sites are varied, including reporting them to search engines for delisting. Google has already taken steps to remove French sites including AlloStreaming from its index in the past.

In addition, sites could be reported to a judge in order to begin a
domain blocking process. Once blocked by IP and DNS, Hadopi wants to
have the power to ensure that domains (and any subsequent mirrors)
remain blocked. Outright domain seizures are also a possibility.

Also, in a move that mirrors more recent anti-piracy activity
involving PayPal and certain credit cards, Hadopi wants to hit operators
in the pocket by targeting the financial intermediaries of sites
subjected to the copyright alerts procedure. This could include
suspension or termination of payments but if financial partners refuse
to cooperate, Hadopi suggests it could take the matter to court.

Finally, and adding momentum to initiatives underway in the United States, Hadopi wants to strangle advertising to sites subjected to the alerts procedure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last post in this topic was made more than 14 days ago. Only post in this topic if you have something valuable to add. Irrelevant posts are not allowed and you will be warned/banned for spamming old topics.

This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.