Tracker Name: ExtremeBits Tracker URL : http://extremebits.org/ Tracker Genre : Sports Tracker Speed: 7/10 Tracker Pretime: 7/10 Tracker Content : 8/10 Extremebits is a great sport tracker for extreme sports like Ski, Snowboard , Bikes, Dive, etc. You gonna love this tracker if you have a hobby from these categories. Speeds and content are very good and Community cool and active. Main page Categories Torrents Forum Request Page Bonus Ranks Donate Rules / FAQ

Lars von Trier's sex drama 'Nymphomaniac' is now causing even more controversy due to its high online piracy rates. According to an MPA-affiliated anti-piracy group, releasing the movie on iTunes first in the U.S. only resulted in even more illegal downloads. However, the full picture seems somewhat less cut-and-dried. pirate-runningThere are many factors responsible for people illegally downloading content from the Internet. Of course, some just like the idea of something for nothing, while others may not have the means or ability to pay, but pricing is only part of the story. After a decade-and-a-half of consumers crying out for content to be made available online in a timely fashion, only now are there truly encouraging signs that the entertainment companies are at least on the right track, with the music industry making better progress than most. But with its emphasis on keeping theater, PPV, DVD and other revenue channels sacred and in a pretty strict sequence, Hollywood has other ideas. The studios are still years away from debuting all movies online and in theaters on the same day which inevitably leads to piracy. This week, however, an MPA-affiliated anti-piracy group claimed that having an early online release only leads to movies being pirated more. The debate surrounds the Lars von Trier movie Nymphomaniac [trailer:NSFW], a controversial two-part drama starring Charlotte Gainsbourg and featuring Christian Slater, Uma Thurman and Willem Dafoe. It documents the decades-long destructive sex life of its lead character, Joe. The movie had its theatrical release in its native Denmark on Christmas Day 2013 but no copy appeared on torrent sites. Usually a movie would then get released in theaters in other countries, but instead it appeared on the U.S. version of iTunes on March 6, 2014. Shortly after the movie appeared illegally online, and quickly became a bit of a hit. NymphiTunes Anti-piracy group Rights Alliance said it hired US-based MarkMonitor to track downloads of the movie and discovered that in the first two weeks after airing on iTunes, the movie was illegally downloaded more than 283,600 times. By March 24 that number had increased to almost 349,000 downloads. Commenting on the findings, lawyer and Rights Alliance chief Maria Fredenslund said that the large number of illegal downloads go towards dispelling the notion that people download less when content is made available quickly online. “We often hear the story that if only the movies came out earlier in the legal market, then it would reduce piracy on the web,” Fredenslund told DR.dk. “Here we see that the number of illegal downloads actually explodes while the film is being made available on the U.S. iTunes.” But while there can be little doubt that the copies currently circulating online are from U.S. VOD sources, stating that an online release caused all this piracy isn’t really the full picture. What Rights Alliance didn’t mention was that the movie didn’t hit U.S. theaters until March 21, which left a two-week plus window in which piracy could thrive. Also complicating matters is that distributor Magnolia Pictures only released the movie to 22 theaters on March 21, with just another 17 gaining access today. The rest will have to wait well into April, by which time part two of the movie will already be debuting. But despite the doom and gloom coming out of Denmark, Magnolia Pictures says the movie is “doing very well.” Nymphomaniac’s budget was less than $5 million with Magnolia reportedly paying $2 million for U.S. rights. Finally, it’s interesting that Rights Alliance admit that when they did their tracking of Nymphomaniac downloads they only came across 1,003 Danish IP addresses pirating the movie. Did giving the movie to Denmark first contribute to that low amount? Or maybe it’s because Danes have become so familiar with obtaining foreign IP addresses to get around a 2008 blockade of The Pirate Bay and gain access to the U.S. version of Netflix, they have since disappeared into the crowd. Torrentfreak

Tracker Name : ConCen Signup Link : http://concen.org/tracker/account-signup.php Genre : E-Learning Closing Date : Additional Information : ConCen formerly known as Conspiracy Central is a private torrent tracker that indexed all things related to conspiracy theories, paranormal activities, myths,etc. Works of unknown authors as well as reputed publishers such as NGC, Discovery and BBC can be found on this tracker. Available formats range from Video documentaries to PDF E-books. The tracker does have scene releases but majority are p2p originated torrents.

According to the top lawyers of the NSA and FBI, their PRISM Internet program doesn’t search for keywords, but rather looks for dodgy email addresses and phone numbers. In other words, it doesn’t quite work the way you thought. The authorities told the public hearing that the National Security Agency didn’t want to scoop up all online transmissions, but the surveillance was rather tailored to track or uncover terror suspects and other national threats. Talking about the NSA email spying, the attorneys said that the agency is “trying to figure out what it wants and gets that specifically”. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence also claimed that it was targeted collection rather than bulk collection. But they seem to forget they are talking about PRISM – the program focused on foreign suspects outside the US. PRISM is subject to less virulent criticism than the other main clandestine operation disclosed by the agency’s ex-contractor Edward Snowden back in 2013, which was the NSA’s mass telephone metadata program collecting data on phone calls by most US citizens. At the moment, the board is conducting a review of PRISM and other programs of the National Security Agency, which can draw “upstream” data directly off the Internet’s backbone.The agency argued that such programs are "compulsory legal" and that untargeted information is not stored.In the meantime, it is known that the default retention period for PRISM information collected from online companies is 5 years, and upstream data is kept for 2 years, according to the board. The FBI lawyers told the board that the data collection from such web giants as Apple, Google and Microsoft is done with their knowledge.

A former Microsoft employee has been arrested in Seattle. The company accused him of leaking Windows 8 to a French tech blogger.Russian national Alex Kibkalo, an ex-Microsoft employee in Lebanon and Russia, is currently facing criminal charges after passing trade secrets to an unnamed blogger. Alex Kibkalo, once a software architect for Microsoft, leaked parts of Windows 8 code and the kit required to activate the software. The unnamed French blogger then published screenshots of the unreleased OS for everyone to see. The employee admitted to Microsoft security that he provided confidential corporate data to the blogger. Unsurprisingly enough, he was invited to clean out his desk. The name of the blogger remains unknown, but the court documents read that he or she was well-known for posting screenshots of pre-release version of the OS. The problem is that the blogger hid their identity stating falsely that they were from Quebec. The court papers also say that Microsoft discovered unauthorized transmissions of proprietary and confidential trade secrets to the blogger: its security experts found an email from Kibkalo within the blogger’s Hotmail account. Despite the fact that the blogger only published screenshots of Windows 8 (though they spread widely online), the employee is also accused of encouraging the blogger to publish the activation kit, a key part of the company’s anti-piracy system. The blogger posted the leaked details on Twitter and blog and sold Windows Server activation keys on eBay. Microsoft claims that in summer 2012, Alex Kibkalo uploaded proprietary software including pre-release software updates of Windows 8 RT and ARM devices, and the Microsoft Activation Server Software Development Kit to a PC in Washington and subsequently to his own Windows Live Sky Drive account, normally used to customize the product code to ensure proper validation in the product key activation process. It also became known that Alex Kibkalo, who was employed by Microsoft for 7 years, got a poor performance review in 2012 and threatened to resign if it wasn’t amended. He has since relocated to Russia to work for another US -based tech firm. Media reports say that Kibkalo was caught after the blogger contacted Microsoft to make sure the leaked Windows 8 code was authentic.

The tech giant already faces a lawsuit in the United States over scanning of emails to deliver ads, as it violates state and federal wiretap laws. In its filings for the lawsuit, Google has admitted scanning the contents of US students’ emails via Apps for Education suite. Apparently, this rose new questions about the compatibility between US kids-protection legislation and Google. 9plaintiffs accused the tech giant of breaching wiretap legislation, and are going to launch a collective “class action”lawsuit in order to force Google to be more open about its policies. Only 2 of them are students, but industry observers agree that the case raises the thorniest questions for Google. It turned out that Google scanned and indexed the students’ emails if they used tools for education, even if their schools have turned off the ability to display ads. The scanning allows Google provide spell check, virus and spam protection, and “Priority Inbox” feature. And there’s no option to turn this one off. This practice could violate a US legislation called Ferpa (the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) – the main law guarding student educational records. The law was not written in an age of cloud computing, and therefore can conflict heavily with Google’s efforts to expand into education. At the moment, over 30 million students, teachers and administrators use Google Apps for Education. The company claims it is committed to protecting the privacy and security of its users –including students, of course. For instance, advertisements in Gmail are turned off by default for those apps and Google isn’t going to change that. As part of the lawsuit, the company argued that the two student plaintiffs consented to their emails being scanned when they first logged in. But since this service is provided to thousands of schools across the US, it raises a question of whether the search giant is data mining the school emails of millions of people for financial gain. The matter is that students, parents, and teachers have never been informed that the contents of their email can be used for advertising purposes. In the meantime, some industry experts aren’t so concerned, because the interpretation of Ferpa remains an open question, at least due to its age (40years). The law can’t adequately define what constitutes an educational record nowadays.

Beast (re-encoding group) recruiting issues. After a management group to discuss resolution: Our goal is to build a non-profit HD PT station, given the current developments and needs, beAst team is now pressing for membership recruitment group (re-encoding group) staff of three to five people to complement us piece needs. hisido said: As long as you play on the computer software can learn to suppress, not difficult to get started, mainly adhere easy! I hope members will support our work, as we have done and we are free to pay, and if everyone can do a little something, this station will be a bright future. Recoding technical guidance has hisido (Hesse and more), th71 (Wo father), Shrimp (shrimp), Linyb8399 (Daewoo), profhuang (Professor Huang) so cattle, a one-month investigation, will stay qualified to enter the formal suppression group (RE-Encode Group), South Guo we will be identified. Recruitment is conditional: First, you must have a love for our team members; Secondly, the hardware configuration for the Intel quad-core eight threads, upload bandwidth basic with 200kb / s or more; repeated, with certain technical basis; fourth point , joined the initial group will have one month mission to suppress the amount of more than three re-encoding works; last point; must be a tutorial does not leak! There is love and they can look forward to paying members can participate in our work...Thank you!

Tracker Name : TapeDown(TD) Signup Link : http://anonym.to/?http://www.tapedown.com/signup.php Genre : Music Closing Date : NA Additional Information : TapeDown(TD) is a private torrent tracker dedicated to Hip-Hop, Rap Content, Urban Music, Mixtapes.

The European Court of Justice ruled today that an ISP may be ordered to block its customers' access to a copyright-infringing website such as The Pirate Bay, etc. However, it will be the National courts that will still have the final say in the matter. The ruling by the ECJ states: ”In today’s judgment, the Court replies to the Oberster Gerichtshof that a person who makes protected subject-matter available to the public on a website without the agreement of the rightholder is using the services of the business which provides internet access to persons accessing that subject-matter. Thus, an ISP, such as UPC Telekabel, which allows its customers to access protected subject-matter made available to the public on the internet by a third party is an intermediary whose services are used to infringe a copyright. The Court notes, in that regard, that the directive, which seeks to guarantee a high level of protection of rightholders, does not require a specific relationship between the person infringing copyright and the intermediary against whom an injunction may be issued. Nor is it necessary to prove that the customers of the ISP actually access the protected subject-matter made accessible on the third party’s website, because the directive requires that the measures which the Member States must take in order to conform to that directive are aimed not only at bringing infringements of copyright and of related rights to an end, but also at preventing them.” According to Telecompaper, The ECJ had been asked to interpret EU copyright law by Austria's Supreme Court regarding a case between ISP UPC Telekabel Wien and film companies Constantin Film Verleih and Wega-Filmproduktionsgesellschaft. The film companies wanted the ISP to block access to the Kino.to site, but UPC Telekabel argued that it did not have a business relationship with the operators of kino.to and that it had never been established that its own customers acted unlawfully. The press release from the ECJ concluded with: ”The Court therefore holds that the fundamental rights concerned do not preclude such an injunction, on two conditions: (i) that the measures taken by the ISP do not unnecessarily deprive users of the possibility of lawfully accessing the information available6 and (ii) that those measures have the effect of preventing unauthorised access to the protected subject-matter or, at least, of making it difficult to achieve and of seriously discouraging users from accessing the subject-matter that has been made available to them in breach of the intellectual property right7. The Court states that internet users and also, indeed, the ISP must be able to assert their rights before the court. It is a matter for the national authorities and courts to check whether those conditions are satisfied.” We know that there are already numerous pirate sites and domains blocked by ISPs in several countries around EU and in the U.K., sites like The Pirate Bay and KickAss Torrents, etc. Today’s ruling suggests that any decision must be fairly balanced and has to satisfy the national authorities and courts. We’ll have to wait and see how the ISPs handle this.

The UK Government has published a guide informing consumers about an upcoming revision of copyright law which will legalize CD and DVD copying for personal use. The changes go into effect in June, and will also broaden other forms of fair use, including parody and quotation rights. uk-flagTo most consumers it is common sense that they can make a backup copy of media they own, but in the UK this is currently illegal. After a public consultation and a thorough inspection of local copyright legislation, the UK Government decided to change current laws in favor of consumers. The changes have been in the planning stage for a few years, but this summer they will finally be implemented. Starting in July people are free to make copies of DVDs, CDs and other types of media, as long as it’s for personal use. To inform the public about these upcoming changes the Government has just released a consumer guide, summing up citizens’ new rights. “Copyright law is being changed to allow you to make personal copies of media you have bought, for private purposes such as format shifting or backup,” the UK’s Intellectual Property Office writes. “The changes will mean that you will be able to copy a book or film you have purchased for one device onto another without infringing copyright.” The UK Government stresses that the changes will make current copyright law more reasonable, and doesn’t expect that copyright holders will suffer any significant harm. However, the changes could generate extra revenue for the technology sector, increasing revenue by £31 million per year. “This measure will benefit technology firms by removing barriers and costs and improving entry to technology markets which rely on consumers being able to make private copies,” the government concluded previously. Under the updated law people will also be able to legally store copies of their music and movies in the cloud. However, the Government stresses that giving others access to your files will remain illegal. “You will be permitted to make personal copies to any device that you own, or a personal online storage medium, such as a private cloud. However, it will be illegal to give other people access to the copies you have made, including, for example, by allowing a friend to access your personal cloud storage,” the guide explains. Similarly, people are free to sell any media they purchase, but all backup copies will have to be destroyed. The mismatch between the law and public opinion became apparent through a Government-commissioned survey, which found that 85% of consumers already thought that DVD and CD ripping was legal. More than one-third of all consumers admitted that they’d already made copies of media they purchased. Besides the new private copying rights, the upcoming amendments will also broaden people’s fair use rights. For example, people no longer have to ask permission to quote from or parody the work of others, such as a news report or a book, as long as it’s “fair dealing” and the source is recognized. From a public point of view the amendments are certainly a welcome change to the restrictive copyright laws that are in place currently, but they are also fashionably late. For those who are interested, a full overview of the upcoming changes is available here. http://torrentfreak.com/uk-dvd-cd-ripping-will-legalized-summer-140327/

Dear Members DS Easter is coming up , so traditionally open the panel grants, which will be visible to all users . The panel will be open from 24 March 2014 to 15 April 2014 . Collected in this way grants will be used to purchase Christmas boxes of film , which will be inserted on the DS . Each payment will be treated as a grant will be awarded to parties and her bonuses: 1 PLN = 1 GB upload + 1,000 points BS In addition, your nickname adorn star donor : - 1-10 PLN - month - 11 - 30 PLN - 3 months - 31 - 60 PLN - 6 months - More than 60 PLN - 12 months + VIP rank for 3 months of access to the club inserts Deposits can be made to the following account : 82 1440 1387 0000 0000 1673 8832 In the transfer fits only your nickname and postscript Easter. From the collected sum depends on how much and what inserts will appear in the Christmas period on our website . We hope that the Easter Bunny will bring us a lot of them. We will make sure that everyone can find something for themselves. We do not focus on a particular genre . We would like to visit there , the entries for each age group. For documentary film enthusiasts who appreciate cinema ambitious for children and those who love cinema light, easy and enjoyable. We hope that there will be movies on DVD and Blu -Ray. Crew DS

Tracker Name : InPeril Signup Link : http://www.inperil.net/signup.php Genre : 0DAY / GENERAL Closing Date : Additional Information :

After focusing on P2P file-sharers in the past, the RIAA is now going after pirating YouTube users. This month the music group obtained a subpoena at a federal court in California and has asked YouTube to hand over the IP-address, email and all other identifying information related to user(s) who uploaded two leaked Chris Brown videos. To many, uploading a music video of their favorite artist seems to be a relatively harmless act, but the major record labels clearly disagree. Up until now “pirating” YouTube users would only get a slap on the wrist by Google, and have their YouTube accounts terminated at worst. However, it appears that the RIAA has had enough and is now going after the uploaders of two leaked Chris Brown tracks. The RIAA’s quest started earlier this month when Vice President Anti-Piracy Mark McDevitt contacted YouTube personally to demand the takedown of the leaked tracks “New Flame” and “Die it For You.” “We are asking you for your immediate assistance in stopping this unauthorized activity,” McDevitt wrote in a letter to the video hosting service. “Specifically, we request that you ensure the removal of the infringing files from your system, or that you disable access to the infringing files, and that you inform the site operator of the illegality of his or her conduct,” he added. YouTube was quick to comply, as both videos are unavailable at the time of writing. However, the RIAA didn’t stop there. Instead, the music group went to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to obtain a subpoena for the personal details of the uploader, or uploaders. In their request the RIAA explains that it requires a subpoena to identify those responsible for the uploads. Among other things, they are looking for the IP-addresses and emails associated with the accounts in question. “The purpose for which this subpoena is sought is to obtain the identity or identities of the individual or individuals assigned to this URL,” RIAA writes. “This information will only be used for the purposes of protecting the rights granted to our members, the sound recording copyright owners, under [the DMCA].” The RIAA’s request for a subpoena was granted by a court clerk on the same day. This means that YouTube now has until April 15 to hand over the requested information, unless it decides to appeal. RIAA subpoena to YouTube To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the RIAA has gone after YouTube users. Whether this is an isolated incident has yet to be seen, but it wouldn’t be a surprise if the record labels want to set an example. The RIAA has been an active proponent of criminalizing those who “stream” copyrighted videos in the past. While that failed through the PIPA bill, this may be an opportunity for them to test the water under current copyright laws. In any case, YouTube users should be aware that the RIAA and others can obtain their personal details on a whim.

Before opening a Buying Thread, Seller's Section and try to find what trackers you need! If you don't find what you are looking for, you can open a [WTB] Thread Try to mention the following in the Buying Topic : Price you are willing to pay Payment method Always prefer buying from Trusted Members like the Staff , VIP Members. Only buyer from users who have a Selling thread. Users who try to sell without a selling thread are usually scammers and it is against the rules to sell without a thread. Things to check regarding the seller before buying from him : His Feedbacks His Reputation How old is he on the Forum Use of Middleman : Always prefer using a middleman in any deal above 75$ A middleman can be any person from the staff.. If the seller and the buyer both are new, Use a Middleman Middleman is compulsory for all deals above $150 when paying using Cryptocurrency. Regards, InviteHawk Staff