Marwan's Content - InviteHawk - Your Only Source for Free Torrent Invites
Buy, Sell, Trade or Find Free Torrent Invites for Private Torrent Trackers Such As redacted, blutopia, losslessclub, femdomcult, filelist, Chdbits, Uhdbits, empornium, iptorrents, hdbits, gazellegames, animebytes, privatehd, myspleen, torrentleech, morethantv, bibliotik, alpharatio, blady, passthepopcorn, brokenstones, pornbay, cgpeers, cinemageddon, broadcasthenet, learnbits, torrentseeds, beyondhd, cinemaz, u2.dmhy, Karagarga, PTerclub, Nyaa.si, Polishtracker etc.
Marwan
-
Posts
5,903 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1 -
Feedback
100% -
Points
510,290 [ Donate ]
Content Type
Raffles
Profiles
Forums
Applications
Official Store
Posts posted by Marwan
-
-
3262
-
45 Odd number please
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Argentinian regulators have been talking to their counterparts in El Salvador about Bitcoin (BTC) adoption, the National Securities Commission of Argentina (CNV) confirmed this weekend.
-
The Bitcoin white paper has made its way back to the Bitcoin.org website following Craig Wright's unsuccessful attempt to prove his identity as Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of the Bitcoin protocol.
-
Trump assures that he would never let crypto die, throwing a shade on Bidenâs moves to kill Bitcoin and crypto.
-
As President Biden nears a decision on SEC crypto regulations, Bitcoin's cautious market response sees a minor drop to $68,400.
-
NVIDIA has responded to a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by several American authors. The chipmaker admits the use of "The Pile" dataset, which included the controversial Books3 database. However, NVIDIA denies all copyright infringement allegations and also rejects the use of the term "shadow library", which is often used for pirated book repositories.
nvidia logoThus far, chip giant NVIDIA has been the main financial beneficiary of the Artificial Intelligence boom.
The company published its latest quarterly results last week, reporting $26 billion in revenue; a 340% increase compared to two years ago.
The staggering revenue numbers over the past year have significantly raised the value of the company, which is now worth more than all public companies in Germany combined. At the same time, however, the AI revolution presents the semiconductor giant with new legal challenges.
NVIDIA Faces Copyright Infringement Claims
Earlier this year, several authors sued NVIDIA over alleged copyright infringement. The class action lawsuit claims that the companyâs AI models were trained on copyrighted works taken from the âpirateâ site Bibliotik. Since this happened without permission, the rightsholders demand compensation.This lawsuit doesnât exist in isolation. Previously, authors and other rightsholders filed similar cases against OpenAI, Google, Meta, and others. Soon after the lawsuit appeared on the docket, another case against NVIDIA followed too.
The similarities between these lawsuits shouldnât diminish their significance. While not all are equally important, some cases will end up setting important precedents. These will, in large part, determine to what extent AI companies can use external sources to train their models, and when or if compensation is required.
Books3
In several cases, the defendants stand accused of using the controversial âBooks3â dataset without permission. Books3 was created by AI researcher Shawn Presser in 2020, who scraped the library of âpirateâ site Bibliotik. The dataset made its way into other databases, which AI companies allegedly used as input.In the NVIDIA lawsuit, for example, American authors Abdi Nazemian, Brian Keene, and Stewart OâNan alleged that the semiconductor company used the Books3 dataset to train its NeMo Megatron language models. This claim isnât far-fetched, since NVIDIA publicly stated that it used EleutherAIâs âThe Pileâ dataset, which includes Books3.
âCertain books written by Plaintiffs are part of Books3 â including the Infringed Works â and thus NVIDIA necessarily trained its NeMo Megatron models on one or more copies of the Infringed Works, thereby directly infringing the copyrights of the Plaintiffs,â the authors claimed.
NVIDIA Responds in Court
The main question for this and other lawsuits is whether the use of this data is permitted under U.S. law. According to NVIDIA, thereâs nothing wrong with how it trained its AI.On Friday, NVIDIA filed its answer to the complaint and responded to the copyright infringement allegations. The company admits that it used âThe Pileâ dataset for training purposes. However, it specifically denies that it made multiple copies of the Books3 dataset.
In addition, the company specifically rejects the use of the term âshadow libraryâ to describe sites such as Bibliotik, LibGen, Z-Library, Sci-Hub, and Annaâs Archive.
This refers to paragraph 27 of the complaint, shown below, where the authors also alleged that hosting or distributing data â as these book repositories do â amounts to copyright infringement.
shadow library
âNVIDIA denies the characterization of the listed data repositories as âshadow librariesâ and denies that hosting data in or distributing data from the data repositories necessarily violates the U.S. Copyright Act,â the company writes.NVIDIA Denies Copyright Infringement
Overall, NVIDIAâs response is mostly made up of denials, as is common at this stage of the legal battle. The company lists several affirmative defenses, including an absence of copyright infringement displaced by fair use.âPlaintiffsâ claims and the putative class membersâ claims fail, in whole or in part, because NVIDIA has not infringed Plaintiffsâ alleged copyrighted works.â
âPlaintiffsâ claims and the putative class membersâ claims are barred, in whole or in part, by fair use under Section 107 of the Copyright Act.
âPlaintiffsâ claims and the putative class membersâ claims fail, in whole or in part, to the extent they claim rights to elements of works or to works which are not protectable under copyright law [âŚ].â
affirmative defenses
NVIDIA further notes that this complaint isnât suitable for class action treatment under federal rules, without providing any further detail.NVIDIAâs response to the complaint is rather straightforward. There are no counterclaims either. The authors now have four weeks to respond to NVIDIAâs filing, which can be countered by the defendant, if required.
Count from 1 to 3333
in Fun 'n' Games
73