Tracker Name : Findline.hu Signup Link : http://findline.hu/signup.php Genre : General Closing Date : 12/01/2015 Additional Information : Hungarian General Tracker

Yesterday The Pirate Bay was raided for the second time in its history and millions of people are still anxiously waiting to see whether the "most resilient" site can make a comeback. At the same time, other torrent sites are noticing a big spike in traffic. In recent years The Pirate Bay took several steps to make the site as resilient as possible, moving from a full-fledged BitTorrent tracker to a trimmed-down and highly portable torrent index. The infamous torrent site canceled nearly all central servers and moved most of its operation to the cloud, where it ran on 21 virtual machines scattered over several commercial cloud hosting providers. Yesterday, however, the site was pulled offline with a single raid at the Nacka station, a nuclear-proof data center built into a mountain complex. Despite various rumors of TPB reincarnations there is still no sign that the site will return anytime soon. So how can it be that The Pirate Bay was taken down despite all the time and effort that went into making its setup raid proof? TF has been speaking with various people familiar with the matter and one of the most likely scenarios emerging is that the site’s loadbalancer was hit by the raid. This has been one of the remaining bottlenecks for TPB in recent years and the cause of previous downtime. If this theory holds true it should be possible for the site to recover quickly if a new loadbalancer with the right setup is put in place. After all, the virtual machines are not centrally hosted and should be up and running. How long it will take to connect these to the Internet remains guesswork for now, if it happens at all. At the moment it’s still unknown what Pirate Bay-related hardware was seized during the raid. The Pirate Bay team previously stressed, however, that everything is encrypted in case it falls into the wrong hands. On the human front, the police arrested one member of the Pirate Bay crew yesterday. The identity of this person hasn’t been confirmed, but if it’s one of the people with access to the site’s crucial infrastructure it will further complicate any possible comeback. Another concern is that the people running TPB and other sites affected by the raid are also remaining quiet. The popular TV-torrent site EZTV remains offline too and thus far the operator is not commenting on the situation. Meanwhile, most other torrent sites are seeing a spike in traffic from Pirate Bay users looking for a new home. TorrentReactor and other large torrent sites inform TF that there’s an increase in traffic of between 5 and 10 percent at the moment. After the first raid in 2006 it took The Pirate Bay three days to recover, making a blazing comeback as “The Police Bay.” There’s not long left to beat that record. http://torrentfreak.com/can-pirate-bay-make-comeback-141210/

BitTorrent Inc, the company behind the popular file-sharing client uTorrent, is working on a P2P powered browser. Dubbed Project Maelstrom, the browser will be able to "keep the Internet open" by serving websites with help from other users. BitTorrent Inc. announced a new project today, a web browser with the ambition of making the Internet “people powered.” Project Maelstrom, as it’s called, is in the very early stages of development but BitTorrent Inc. is gearing up to send out invites for a closed Alpha test. The company hasn’t released a feature set as yet, but it’s clear that the browser will serve websites and other content through users. According to BitTorrent Inc. this can not only speed up websites but also boost people’s privacy. In addition, it should be capable of bypassing website blockades and other forms of censorship. “If we are successful, we believe this project has the potential to help address some of the most vexing problems facing the Internet today,” BitTorrent CEO Eric Klinker notes. “How can we keep the Internet open? How can we keep access to the Internet neutral? How can we better ensure our private data is not misused by large companies? How can we help the Internet scale efficiently for content?” The idea for a BitTorrent powered browser is not new. The Pirate Bay started work on a related project a few months ago with the aim of keeping the site online even if its servers were raided. The project hasn’t been released yet, although it would have come in handy today. Interestingly, BitTorrent’s brief summary of how the browser will work sounds a lot like Pirate Bay’s plans. The company shared the following details with Gigaom. “It works on top of the BitTorrent protocol. Websites are published as torrents and Maelstrom treats them as first class citizens instead of just downloadable content. So if a website is contained within a torrent we treat it just like a normal webpage coming in over HTTP.” More details are expected to follow during the months to come. Those interested in Project Maelstrom can sign up for an invite to the Alpha test here. http://torrentfreak.com/bittorrent-inc-works-p2p-powered-browser-141210/

Tracker Name : FunFile.eu Signup Link : http://funfile.eu/signup.php Genre : General Closing Date : N/A Additional Information : N/A

Tracker Name : Myxz.org Signup Link : http://www.myxz.org/signup.php Genre : General Closing Date : N/A Additional Information : N/A

Tracker Name : 3DTorrents Signup Link : http://www.3dtorrents.org/index.php?page=signup Genre : Movies Closing Date : N/A Additional Information : 3D Movies Tracker

Tracker Name : CherryKiss Signup Link : http://www.cherrykiss.org/signup.php Genre : XXX Closing Date : N/A Additional Information : Greek Porn Tracker

Tracker Name : Scenefile.net Signup Link : http://scenefile.net/signup.php Genre : General Closing Date : N/A Additional Information : 7800 torrents, movies HD, games, music, etc.

Tracker Name : Bit-Latino Signup Link : http://www.bit-latino.com/signupnew.php Genre : General Closing Date : N/A Additional Information : Latin American tracker. Good for movies in DVD format, with Latin American Spanish audio or subtitles.

Hi. I would ask to seedbox for a month to improve my situation in trackers. Please sent me. Thanks

Apply of one of the invites. Thanks.

Unity fullness one year today - Many Happy Returns! Thanks to you, amazing DB users can Unity now celebrate a whole year of English bits. We have tried to give you movies in numerous variations and genres, and hope that I have been happy with it. Thus, we have depleted our account, and can allow all users 10 gb. uploading. We have made ​​a count and have come to that we have given you in the neighborhood of 320 different movies during our time. We look forward to another year of English Bits . Thanks for the support. // Unity

Tracker Name : Addict To Net Signup Link : https://addict-to.net/index.php?page=signup Genre : General Closing Date : N/A Additional Information : French Private Tracker

Tracker Name : Viettorrent Signup Link : http://viettorrent.vn/signup.php Genre : General Closing Date : N/A Additional Information : Vietnamese Private Torrent

After existing for less than a month, Grooveshark's Chromecast app on the Play Store has been killed by a copyright complaint. Perhaps unsurprisingly the objections came from the RIAA, who say that Grooveshark's service infringes on their artists' copyrights. Two years ago, music streaming service Grooveshark suffered a setback after its app was pulled from Google’s Android store for the second time. While Google cited Terms of Service violations, ongoing copyright-related issues with the world’s largest recording labels were the number one suspect for the takedown. Generally, Grooveshark parent company Escape Media are not on good terms with the RIAA due to legal issues dating back several years. Last month, however, there appeared to be something of a turnaround in relationships with Google when Grooveshark announced that it was about to debut Chromecast support via the Play Store. The development was well received, with Hypebot wondering if Google welcoming Grooveshark back amounted to redemption for the US-based streaming company. But now, less than a month later, it’s all over. “After a jointly approved press release from Grooveshark, we were notified by Google [that] our app was suspended for Terms of Service of compliance,” Grooveshark announced today. The development came as a surprise to Grooveshark, since the company believes it did enough to comply with Google’s Terms of Service this time around. However, it will come as no surprise that the root of the complaint lies with the major recording labels based in the United States. According to a statement sent to TheNextWeb, the RIAA is behind the suspension after claiming that Grooveshark’s service infringes on their artists’ copyrights. “We found this interesting as Google (YouTube) is also engaged in a lawsuit over the same points,” a Grooveshark spokesperson said. While that is indeed true, YouTube’s relationships with the labels are considerably better than those currently enjoyed by Grooveshark. Even Google sympathizes with the labels, something which became evident last year when the search giant excluded the term Grooveshark from its Autocomplete and Instant services. But despite the drawbacks, Grooveshark continues. Grooveshark for Android can still be downloaded from the company’s site. Chromecast functionality also remains. “You may still access your full Grooveshark library on Chromecast via our main site (grooveshark.com) or html5 mobile site….using the ‘mirroring’ tool,” the company concludes. After existing for less than a month, Grooveshark's Chromecast app on the Play Store has been killed by a copyright complaint. Perhaps unsurprisingly the objections came from the RIAA, who say that Grooveshark's service infringes on their artists' copyrights. Two years ago, music streaming service Grooveshark suffered a setback after its app was pulled from Google’s Android store for the second time. While Google cited Terms of Service violations, ongoing copyright-related issues with the world’s largest recording labels were the number one suspect for the takedown. Generally, Grooveshark parent company Escape Media are not on good terms with the RIAA due to legal issues dating back several years. Last month, however, there appeared to be something of a turnaround in relationships with Google when Grooveshark announced that it was about to debut Chromecast support via the Play Store. The development was well received, with Hypebot wondering if Google welcoming Grooveshark back amounted to redemption for the US-based streaming company. But now, less than a month later, it’s all over. “After a jointly approved press release from Grooveshark, we were notified by Google [that] our app was suspended for Terms of Service of compliance,” Grooveshark announced today. The development came as a surprise to Grooveshark, since the company believes it did enough to comply with Google’s Terms of Service this time around. However, it will come as no surprise that the root of the complaint lies with the major recording labels based in the United States. According to a statement sent to TheNextWeb, the RIAA is behind the suspension after claiming that Grooveshark’s service infringes on their artists’ copyrights. “We found this interesting as Google (YouTube) is also engaged in a lawsuit over the same points,” a Grooveshark spokesperson said. While that is indeed true, YouTube’s relationships with the labels are considerably better than those currently enjoyed by Grooveshark. Even Google sympathizes with the labels, something which became evident last year when the search giant excluded the term Grooveshark from its Autocomplete and Instant services. But despite the drawbacks, Grooveshark continues. Grooveshark for Android can still be downloaded from the company’s site. Chromecast functionality also remains. “You may still access your full Grooveshark library on Chromecast via our main site (grooveshark.com) or html5 mobile site….using the ‘mirroring’ tool,” the company concludes. http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-complaint-kills-grooveshark-chromecast-support-140909/

Rightscorp, a prominent piracy monitoring firm that works with Warner Bros. and other copyright holders, wants Grande Communications to reveal the identities alleged pirates linked to 30,000 IP-addresses/timestamp combinations. Unlike other providers the Texas ISP refused to give in easily, instead deciding to fight the request in court. grande_communicationsThere are many ways copyright holders approach today’s “online piracy problem.” Some prefer to do it through innovation, while others prefer educational messages, warnings or even lawsuits. Another group is aiming to generate revenue by obtaining lots of small cash settlements. Rightscorp has chosen the latter model but unlike traditional copyright trolls it uses the DMCA to reach its goal. On behalf of copyright holders such as Warner Bros. they send DMCA notices with a settlement offer to ISPs, who then forward them to their customers. Not all ISPs are cooperating with this scheme, but for this problem Rightscorp also found a solution. In recent months the company has requested more than 100 DMCA subpoenas, asking smaller ISPs to identify hundreds or thousands of alleged pirates. These DMCA subpoenas bypass the judge and only have to be signed off by a court clerk. In other words, Rightscorp uses an uncommon shortcut to cheaply and quickly expose the alleged pirates, and nearly all of the ISPs happily complied. The Texas ISP Grande Communications also received a signed subpoena in the mailbox, listing 30,000 IP-addresses/timestamp combinations of alleged pirates. However, Grande informed the court that it refuses to identify its account holders. Among other things, it argues that Rightscorp abuses the Court’s subpoena power. “The Subpoena is part of an ongoing campaign by Rightscorp to harvest ‘settlements’ from Internet subscribers (who may or may not have been the users of their accounts at the times and dates in question) located across the nation through an abuse of the subpoena power of the federal courts in California,” Grande’s lawyer writes. The Internet provider further notes that the anti-piracy company is only issuing these subpoenas to smaller regional ISPs as these are less likely to fight back. “As can be seen from the PACER listing, Rightscorp has avoided sending subpoenas to any of the national ISPs (such as Verizon, AT&T, or Comcast), but instead has sent subpoenas to regional ISPs in various locations around the nation,” Grande writes. “Presumably, Rightscorp is hoping that the regional ISPs, with smaller in-house legal departments, will be likely to simply comply with its subpoenas, especially given that those subpoenas bear the signature of the Clerk of the Court.” Grande then goes on to state that jurisprudence has long-established that DMCA subpoenas can’t be used to identify file-sharers. Instead, Rightscorp should file a copyright infringement lawsuit as many other copyright holders have, so that a judge can properly review the evidence and arguments. The ISP believes that Rightscorp is trying to bypass the scrutiny of a judge in order to avoid due process from taking place. This should not be allowed and Grande therefore asks the court to quash the subpoena. “Rightscorp’s purpose in improperly issuing subpoenas under [the DMCA] is clear: to avoid judicial review of the litany of issues that would arise in seeking the requisite authorization from a court for the discovery of the sought-after information, including issues relating to joinder, personal jurisdiction, and venue.” “In similar contexts and in no uncertain terms, the courts have stated that bypassing procedural rights of individual subscribers in order to harvest personal information en masse from a single proceeding will not be tolerated,” Grande adds. When we covered Rightscorp’s use of DMCA subpoenas earlier this year, several legal experts indeed said that DMCA subpoenas are not allowed in file-sharing cases. This was decided in a case between Verizon and the RIAA more than a decade ago, and has been upheld in subsequent cases. Rightscorp CEO Christopher Sabec disagreed, however, and he told TorrentFreak that the court made the wrong decision in the RIAA case. According to Sabec the verdict won’t hold up at the Supreme Court, so they’re ignoring it. “The [RIAA vs. Verizon] Court case used flawed reasoning in concluding that an ISP such as Verizon is not a ‘Service Provider’ even though it clearly meets the definition laid out in the statute,” Sabec said. “The issue has actually not been addressed by the vast majority of Circuit Courts. We believe that the decision you cite will be overturned when the issue reaches the Supreme Court,” he added. Whether Rightscorp is indeed willing to fight this up to the Supreme Court has yet to be seen. For now, however, the alleged pirates are safe at Grande Communications. It’s worth noting that Grande only has 140,000 customers. The 30,000 IP-address and timestamp combinations appear to include many duplicate entries, so the total number of affected subscribers is likely to be only a fraction of that number. http://torrentfreak.com/u-s-internet-provider-refuses-to-expose-30000-alleged-pirates-140909/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:%20Torrentfreak%20(Torrentfreak)

Tracker Name : Torrentsmd Signup Link : http://www.torrentsmd.com/signup.php Genre : General Closing Date : Soon Additional Information : N/A

HDWTV招募视频剪辑发布人员 This notice is only for Chinese member. 随着HDWTV地发展，录制机器出现富余，为了能提供更多优质的录制资源，我们需要更多人手参与进来。这次 招募门槛较低，不需要有录制设备。只需满足以前条件: 1. 有时间和耐性完成分配下来的视频剪辑任务。 2. 网络带宽连接性较好，能流畅登录我们的服务器。 3. 具有学习精神，有恒心，切忌三分钟热度。 如果您愿意加入我们，请在招募页面申请HDWTV，详述自身情况，我们会尽快与您联系。 HDWinG管理组 Translate: HDWTV staff recruitment video clip released This notice is only for Chinese member. With HDWTV development, recording machines appear surplus, in order to provide more high-quality recording resources, we need more manpower involved. The lower the recruitment threshold, do not have the recording equipment. Just before the conditions are satisfied: 1 have the time and patience to complete the assigned task down video clips. 2 network bandwidth connectivity is good, fluent log on to our server. 3 has a learning spirit, perseverance, avoid three minutes heat. If you would like to join us, please apply in the recruitment page HDWTV, detailing their own circumstances, we will contact you shortly. HDWinG Management Group

Tracker Name : Worldtts Signup Link : http://worldtts.com/account-signup.php Genre : General Closing Date : N/A Additional Information : Brazilian Tracker

ToTracker Name : Total-Torrents Signup Link : http://total-torrents.com/signup.php Genre : General Closing Date : N/A Additional Information : Total torrents is one of the most chilled torrent communites on the net! going for old qualities from some awesome trackers of the past that unfortuanatly closed some for personal reasons etc torrents uploaded everyday we are upto nearely 300 as before you may know we had seeding problems etc now we are back on tsse 7.4 and kicking it! the staff (including me) are chilled and leaned back if we was anymore leaned back our spines would break orginally we had 380 members and 1,025 torrents but unfortuanly we lost them and after there was a problem with seeding where the seeds would drop but we are back Members: 434 Torrents: 646 Seeders: 738 Leechers: 0 Peers: 738 Threads: 54 Posts: 150 NOW WITH A AUTOBOT UPLOADER GIVING YOU TORRENTS TWICE AS FAST! COME ON BY ... SIGNUPS CLOSE SOON

Tracker Name : HQMusic Signup Link : http://tracker.hqmusic.vn/signup.php Genre : Music Closing Date : N/A Additional Information : HQMusic is the first Lossless Tracker from Vietnam that focuses on Asian Music Releases, most of them are on Top Quality,and some are extremely rare.It has internal encoders HQM,MRHQ and OwL .Their release are always in the best quality. HQMusic has good bonus system and lots of torrents are freeleech so keeping good ratio is easy.Like most Asian trackers,it has newbie task that must be completed in order to continue using the tracker.

LIFETIME V.I.P SPECIAL 70% OFF! WE ARE OFFERING LIFETIME V.I.P. FOR 70% OFF at $30 USD OFFER GOOD MONDAYDAY SEPT. 8th - WEDNESDAY SEPT. 10th JUST DONATE $30 USD AND I WILL MANUALLY UPGRADE YOUR ACCOUNT. IF YOU ALREADY DONATED THIS MONTH JUST DONATE THE REMAINING AMOUNT TO GET LIFETIME VIP! IE: IF YOU DONATED $5 IN SEPTEMBER JUST DONATE $25 TO GET LIFETIME VIP CHOOSE UPLOAD CREDIT WHILE DONATING AND I WILL CHANGE YOU TO LIFETIME VIP. YOU CAN DONATE HERE: http://hd-mkv.me/index.php?page=donate BENEFITS OF LIFETIME VIP OFFER INCLUDE 1. NO REQUIRED SEED TIME, SO NO HIT AND RUNS 2. GOLD MEDAL NEXT TO YOUR NAME TO SHOW YOUR LIFETIME VIP 3. NAME IN RED FOR EVERYONE TO SEE 4. ACCESS TO ENCODER FORUMS TO SEE WHAT RELEASES ARE BEING ENCODED BY MKVRG 5. 2TB UPLOAD CREDIT 6. 500,000 BONUS POINTS 7. 15 INVITES 8 ABLE TO UPLOAD TO THE SITE 9. ACCESS TO VIP FORUMS FOR INVITE OFFERS TO OTHER SITES 10. WARM FUZZY FEELING FOR HELPING THE SITE! 11. ALL WARNINGS IF YOU HAVE ANY REMOVED AND NO MORE HIT AND RUN WARNINGS TO WORRY ABOUT!! THANKS FOR SUPPORTING THE SITE EVERYONE! ALL DONATIONS WILL COUNT TOWARD THE SITE GOAL FOR SEPTEMBER TO GET FREE LEECH TILL OCT 12TH ONCE WE REACH 100% DONATIONS

Global Notice Hi Raiders, We're currently 8 days into September and as you can see our donations stand at a whopping 0% We really need you guys to support the site and if you are able please do donate and support us. Thank you.

In a submission to the Australian Government on the issue of online piracy, the BBC indicates that ISPs should be obliged to monitor their customers' activities. Service providers should become suspicious that customers could be pirating if they use VPN-style services and consume a lot of bandwidth, the BBC says. After cutting its teeth as a domestic broadcaster, the BBC is spreading its products all around the globe. Shows like Top Gear have done extremely well overseas and the trend of exploiting other shows in multiple territories is set to continue. As a result the BBC is now getting involved in the copyright debates of other countries, notably Australia, where it operates four subscription channels. Following submissions from Hollywood interests and local ISPs, BBC Worldwide has now presented its own to the Federal Government. Its text shows that the corporation wants new anti-piracy measures to go further than ever before. The BBC begins by indicating a preference for a co-operative scheme, one in which content owners and ISPs share responsibility to “reduce and eliminate” online copyright infringement. Educating consumers on both the impact of piracy and where content can be obtained legally online would be supported by improved availability of official offerings. After providing general piracy statistics, the BBC turn to the recent leaking of the new series of Doctor Who to file-sharing networks which acted “as a spoiler” to the official global TV premiere. “Despite the BBC dedicating considerable resources to taking down and blocking access to these Doctor Who materials, there were almost 13,000 download attempts of these materials from Australian IP addresses in the period between their unauthorized access and the expiration of the usual catch-up windows,” the BBC write. So what can be done? In common with all rightsholder submissions so far, the BBC wants to put pressure on ISPs to deal with their errant subscribers via a graduated response scheme of educational messages backed up by punitive measures for the most persistent of infringers. “ISPs should warn any alleged copyright infringers through a graduated notification system that what they are doing is illegal and, at the same time, educate them about the law, the importance of copyright to funding content and services they enjoy and where they can access the material they want legally. However. if the consumers do not abide by the notifications then more serious action may need to be taken,” the BBC note. Those sanctions could lead to a throttling of a users’ Internet connection but should not normally lead to a complete disconnection. However, the BBC doesn’t rule that out, adding that such measures could be employed “in the most serious and egregious circumstances, as is the case in the United States.” While little in the foregoing presents much of a surprise, the BBC goes further than any other rightsholder submission thus far in suggesting that ISPs should not only forward notices, but also spy on their customers’ Internet usage habits. VPNs are pirate tools “Since the evolution of peer-to-peer software protocols to incorporate decentralized architectures, which has allowed users to download content from numerous host computers, the detection and prosecution of copyright violations has become a complex task. This situation is further amplified by the adoption of virtual private networks (VPNs) and proxy servers by some users, allowing them to circumvent geo-blocking technologies and further evade detection,” the BBC explain. “It is reasonable for ISPs to be placed under an obligation to identify user behavior that is ‘suspicious’ and indicative of a user engaging in conduct that infringes copyright. Such behavior may include the illegitimate use by Internet users of IP obfuscation tools in combination with high download volumes.” While the BBC goes on to state that “false positives” would need to be avoided in order to “safeguard the fundamental rights of consumers”, none of this will sit well with Internet service providers or the public. Throwing around accusations of illegal activity based on the existence of an encrypted tunnel and high bandwidth consumption is several steps beyond anything suggested before. Site blocking The BBC says it supports the blocking of overseas infringing sites at the ISP level after obtaining a court injunction. Of interest is a proposal to use a system which allows for injunctions to be modified after being issued in order to deal with sites finding ways to circumvent bans. “It is important to have the ability to get existing injunctions varied by the court when defendants reappear in different guises, a useful tool in the United Kingdom,” the BBC writes. Who foots the bill? Who pays for all of the above has been the major sticking point in all Australian negotiations thus far. The ISPs largely believe they shouldn’t have to pay for anything, but most rightsholders – the BBC included – think that the costs need to be shared. “In light of the fact that a large inducement for internet users to become customers of ISPs is to gain access to content (whether legally or illegally), it is paramount that ISPs are required to take an active role in preventing and fighting online copyright infringement by establishing and contributing meaningfully to the cost of administering some form of graduated response scheme,” the BBC concludes.

The New Zealand Court of Appeal has ruled that local police must return clones of the devices that were seized from Kim Dotcom during the 2012 raid. The Court argues that Dotcom and his colleagues should be able to have access to the information in preparation for the extradition hearings. January 2012, New Zealand Police carried out the largest ever action against individuals accused of copyright infringement. The raid on Dotcom’s Coatesville mansion was requested by United States authorities who are now trying to extradite the Megaupload founder and several of his colleagues. Despite protests from Dotcom about the legitimacy of the search warrants, the raid was found to be legal earlier this year. However, that doesn’t mean that all seized property can be kept from the New Zealand-based entrepreneur. Today the New Zealand Court of Appeal ruled that clones of the seized electronic devices should be returned to Dotcom and his co-defendants “as soon as reasonably practicable.” Last month the prosecution explained that the data hadn’t yet been handed over because some of it was encrypted, making it impossible for police to verify and investigate its contents. In its ruling today, the Court of Appeal respects this hesitation but noted that all non-encrypted data should be returned. The rest can follow after the defendants give up their encryption passwords to two nominated police officers. Previously the Court of Appeal ruled that police crossed a line when they shared cloned data with the United States. In a reference, today’s order prohibits the two police officers from revealing the encryption passwords with others. “[...] in particular to any representative of the government of the United States of America,” the verdict reads. http://torrentfreak.com/police-ordered-to-return-clones-of-dotcoms-seized-data-140908/