Jump to content

ScooterS's Content - Page 4 - InviteHawk - Your Only Source for Free Torrent Invites

Buy, Sell, Trade or Find Free Torrent Invites for Private Torrent Trackers Such As redacted, blutopia, losslessclub, femdomcult, filelist, Chdbits, Uhdbits, empornium, iptorrents, hdbits, gazellegames, animebytes, privatehd, myspleen, torrentleech, morethantv, bibliotik, alpharatio, blady, passthepopcorn, brokenstones, pornbay, cgpeers, cinemageddon, broadcasthenet, learnbits, torrentseeds, beyondhd, cinemaz, u2.dmhy, Karagarga, PTerclub, Nyaa.si, Polishtracker etc.

ScooterS

Banned
  • Posts

    161
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    100%
  • Points

    0 [ Donate ]

Posts posted by ScooterS

  1. Mpaa complained so we seized your funds, paypal says
    Developers considering adding a torrent search engine to their portfolio should proceed with caution, especially if they value their income streams. Following a complaint from the MPAA one developer is now facing a six month wait for PayPal to unfreeze thousands in funds, the vast majority related to other projects.
    For several years PayPal has been trying to limit how much business it does with sites involved with copyright infringement. Unsurprisingly torrent sites are high up on the payment processors “do not touch” list.
    For that reason it is quite rare to see PayPal offered as a donation method on the majority of public sites as these are spotted quite quickly and often shut down. It’s unclear whether PayPal does its own ‘scouting’ but the company is known to act upon complaints from copyright holders as part of the developing global “Follow the Money” anti-piracy strategy.
    This week Andrew Sampson, the software developer behind new torrent search engine ‘Strike‘, discovered that when you have powerful enemies, bad things can happen.
    With no advertising on the site, Sampson added his personal PayPal account in case anyone wanted to donate. Quickly coming to the conclusion that was probably a bad idea, Sampson removed the button and carried on as before. One month later PayPal contacted him with bad news.
    “We are contacting you as we have received a report that your website getstrike is currently infringing upon the intellectual property of Motion Picture Association of America, Inc.,” PayPal began.
    “Such infringement also violates PayPal’s Acceptable Use Policy. Therefore your account has been permanently limited.”
    It isn’t clear why PayPal waited for a month after donations were removed from Strike to close Sampson’s six-year-old account but the coder believes that his public profile (he doesn’t hide his real identity) may have led to his issues.
    “It seems someone at the MPAA realized I took donations using PayPal from some of my other LEGAL open source projects (like https://github.com/Codeusa/Borderless-Gaming)and was able to get the email of my account,” the dev told TF.
    While Sampson had regularly been receiving donations from users of his other open source projects, he says he only received $200 from users of Strike, a small proportion of the $2,500 in his personal account when PayPal shut it down.
    “That money was earned through legitimate freelance work and was going to be used specifically for my rent/car payment so it kind of sucks,” he says.
    While it’s going to be a painful 180 day wait for Sampson to get his money back from PayPal, the lack of options for receiving donations on his other projects could prove the most damaging moving forward. Sampson does accept Bitcoin, but it’s nowhere near as user-friendly as PayPal.
    Of course, this is all part of the MPAA’s strategy. By making sites like Strike difficult to run, they hope that developers like Sampson will reconsider their positions and move on. And in this case they might just achieve their aims.
    “I’ve allowed someone else to manage the site for the time being. It will operate as it normally does but I need a bit to clear my head and don’t want anything to do with it as it’s become quite stressful,” Sampson says.
    “I think the MPAA is playing low ball tactics against a developer who just wanted a better search engine. I don’t condone piracy, but I sure as hell understand why it happens.”
    Source torrentfreak.com
    • Upvote 1
  2. Demonii refuses to be censored after being forced to remove over 10000 torrent hashes
    Demonii, one of the largest BitTorrent trackers on the Web recently had to ban over 10,000 torrent hashes because of copyright-infringements.
    This is despite not actually offering torrents for download itself. Deomnii connects you to people who share their files on other sites like The Pirate Bay.
    Torrent hashes are used to verify the data that is being transferred. Every .torrent file that’s downloaded includes information on the size, type of file it is and what’s included in the download, so each of these are checked against the hash first to make sure it’s the correct file.
    According to TorrentFreak, the site was put under pressure by a music industry lawfirm to block the torrents.
    However, it was the site’s own hosting site that insisted the accused files be removed within 24 hours and with little choice, Demonii complied.
    Its operator told TorrentFreak that these tactics were “bullying” and that they have since moved to a new hosting provider.
    “We have moved to a different hosting provider, one which we hope will take the matter more seriously and not just bend over backwards for any outrageous claim and takedown request where ownership can not be proven.”
    So, for now, Demonii will remain uncensored and can return to being one of the most popular trackers on the Web.
    • Upvote 1
  3. AnimeBytes News
    May updates
    A few quick updates:
    After changing our password security last year, many people still haven't updated their passwords yet. In a weeks time (May 16th) everybody who hasn't reset their password yet will need to select a new password. We recommend using unique passwords (a different on for each of your accounts) as well as strong passwords (At least eight characters, containing upper- and lower-case letters, numbers, and punctuation or other symbols). Websites like strongpasswordgenerator can help you with those. You may also want to use a password manager or vault like KeePass to store your unique passwords in. If you don't know where to update your password before the 16th, please take a look at your settings.
    Secondly we have a small reminder about the last announcement: You can still submit your votes for the fourth anual AnimeBytes Top 50 Collage here and get with information on the process and links to the old collages. Votes are open before May 14th, so get your vote on!
    On the development side of things:
    We added two new options in the user settings that affect the forum view a bit. You can now hide all author info in a post (achievements, treats, etc.) and there are more options on how avatars are displayed: hidden, shown, circle and cut-off/square-like. Give it a try to see what that exactly means
    Also, we added two-factor authentication. Go to account settings to enable it. Google Authenticator is supported. If you haven't used two-factor authentication before, one important thing to keep in mind is that you won't be able to log in if you lose your phone, so use responsibly.
    With these more regular announcements we also realized that this is some prime "advertising" space for community projects just like the AB podcast for which I'll hand this over to Except:
    Greetings ABusers! As some of you might know, we are running a podcast where we discuss anime after the end of each season. For those of you who just found out, though, I have a couple of links and directions that will help if you are interested in that sort of thing. More to the point, even if you aren't or if you have never tried listening to a podcast - try it out! You might very well enjoy it! So, first things first, we've got a forum thread where you can leave feedback, discuss the latest podcast and reach out to the team and me if you have any questions. Next, there's our official blog that we try to update relatively often. If you are curious as to when the next show is coming or are trying to find the list of changes that have been made to the format of the podcast - this is the place to go to. Although all the episodes of the show are available in MP3 and AAC on our blog, we also have a YouTube Channel and we would love your support so that more people know about it. Maybe even people who are not necessarily from AB but are still interested in anime! Last but not least, we've been thinking of more show formats to fill the channel with, so we are doing a review show on a semi-regular basis and I am also currently looking for feedback on the idea of interviews with AB members and staff. So if you're interested in that, please do drop by and vote on the poll. Other than that, if you already are following our work, thank you very much for your support and we hope to continue making the show better with each upcoming episode
    - Except
    And now for your regularly scheduled fanservice:
    DBjd1Ne.jpg
    (Please blame potatoe for the excessive amounts)
    • Upvote 1
  4. iPT and BTN !
    From Now on iPT & BTN is in good terms. Agreement reached!
    The agreement agreed between Microsoft & /u/Betrayed_BTN
    Thank You !
    • Upvote 1
  5. What's a Private Tracker, and Why Should I Use One?
    What Does It Mean to Be "Private"?
    A BitTorrent tracker, for those of you that don't remember, is a server that regulates the communication between those downloading and uploading torrents. The defining factor of private BitTorrent trackers is that they're selective about who gets to use the site. Unlike The Pirate Bay or isoHunt, on which anyone can search and download torrents, private trackers require you be invited by another user and create an account in order to use the service. If you don't know someone with an account, then you need to go through a somewhat intense interview process to get an invite (trading or selling invites online is strictly prohibited in most cases). In addition, they often have many rules about how you can use the site. These can include but are not limited to:
    17hukyij779t7jpg.jpg
    Rules regarding ratio: You need to have a certain upload to download ratio, meaning you can't just download torrents and delete them—you need to seed them so others can download them too. Some sites will ban you if you have a low ratio, some just restrict what you can do on the site, like upload torrents, make torrent requests, or invite other users.
    Rules regarding invites: Users you invite reflect on you, and if they harm the community, it can harm your stance in the community as well (in some cases, you could be banned).
    Rules regarding uploads: If you upload files to the site, they need to be of a certain quality, format, and/or use a certain organizational structure. Where most BitTorrent sites seem like a hodgepodge of unorganized files, private trackers are usually much more organized and quality-conscious.
    These rules will vary from site to site, but that's a general idea of what you can expect. There are a lot of great private trackers out there, most of whom have specific niches—for example, What.CD(WCD) focuses on music, BroadcastTheNet(BTN) stocks lots of television and PassThePopcorn(PTP)has a strong movie library. If you're interested in signing up for one, I recommend searching around for a private tracker that fits your needs, then researching that sites rules, regulations, and invitation practices before joining. If you can't keep up with the rules, there's no point in even trying to get an invite, because these guys tend to be pretty serious.
    What Do I Get Out of It?
    That sounds like an awful lot of work just to use BitTorrent, doesn't it? Well, you get what you pay for, in this case. Because of these rules, you get a lot
    of benefits, including (but again, not limited to):
    A fantastic selection of torrents: Most of these sites pride themselves on a wide selection of whatever type of file they focus on. In fact, in many cases, it's hard to find something they don't have.
    High quality files: Most sites have very high quality standards, and if an uploaded torrent doesn't meet them, it's deleted. If you're looking for lossless music, for example, a private tracker is a great place to find them.
    Crazy-fast downloads: Because the community is so great about seeding, and because lots of them have fast internet connections, you'll get pretty insane speeds on private trackers compared to public ones.
    Some increased privacy: Because the rules are so strict and the sites are so much less traveled than sites like The Pirate Bay, you're a lot less likely to have someone looking over your shoulder at everything you download. However, I wouldn't recommend a private tracker just for anonymity—if you really want to keep your downloading private, I still highly recommend a VPN or proxy service like BTGuard.
    A great community: The people on private trackers are very helpful in answering questions, keeping things seeded, and even uploading torrents that you request.
    Should I Use One?
    At this point, only you can really answer that question. Check out some tracker reviews over at TorrentInvites, and if you find a few that appeal to you, research their invite process and site rules and see if they're things you can handle (for invites check our The OFFICIAL TorrentInvites.org Selling Store. or you can try to apply for one of our GiveAways ).
    Do you know enough about BitTorrent to understand how the site is maintained? Are you able to seed your torrents often (that is, do you leave your computer on all day or have an always-on NAS to seed for you)? If the site's rules or interview process don't look like something you can handle, then I don't particularly recommend joining. Again, Usenet will get you pretty far when it comes to most things—but if you're serious about following the rules and want a great selection of quality torrents, private trackers can be pretty awesome
    • Upvote 1
  6. Myspleen News
    2015-05-10
    The site has been migrated to a new VM image. With this, many package upgrades have happened. Hopefully this will help stop the crazy. (Users table truncated twice in 24hrs)
    If anything is out of the ordinary, report it on IRC. If the user table drops again, we will have to consider more drastic options.
    Thanks for flying Myspleen!
    2015-05-08
    Site Update:
    The user database had been corrupted for some unknown reason, causing log in issues for everyone for a few hours. Other site databases appear to have been unaffected. There has been a partial restore to allow some users access to the site, but some users appear as (unknown). The backup of the database is from a few days ago, so the new members who had joined since that backup will need to be invited again. More work will need to be done. Please be patient.
    Update: Full user restore (as much as we have, through end of April) has been applied. If your friends account is missing, get 'em another invite. Join us on IRC if you need help.
    • Upvote 1
  7. six strikes” anti-piracy scheme is a sham, filmmakers say
    The Internet Security Task Force, an anti-piracy initiative launched by several independent movies studios, is calling for an end to the "six strikes" Copyright Alert System. According to the group the voluntary agreement does nothing to stop piracy. Instead, the group is promoting the Canadian notice-and-notice model as a much more effective alternative.
    pirate-runningTo counter the ever increasing piracy threat a group of smaller movie studios launched a new coalition last month, the Internet Security Task Force (ISTF).
    ISTF, which includes Voltage Pictures, Millennium, Bloom, Sierra/Affinity and FilmNation Entertainment among its members, is poised to be more aggressive than the MPAA.
    Today the group unveils its first point of action. According to the group it’s time to end the voluntary “six strikes” Copyright Alert System, the voluntary anti-piracy agreement between the RIAA, MPAA and several large U.S. Internet providers.
    ISTF presents data which reveals that the six strikes warnings are not getting the desired result, describing the system as a “sham”.
    According to Millennium Films President Mark Gill his studio sent numerous piracy notices directed at ‘Expendables 3′ pirates under the scheme, but only a tiny fraction were forwarded by the participating ISPs.
    “We’ve always known the Copyright Alert System was ineffective, as it allows people to steal six movies from us before they get an educational leaflet. But now we have the data to prove that it’s a sham,” Gill comments.
    “On our film ‘Expendables 3,’ which has been illegally viewed more than 60 million times, the CAS only allowed 0.3% of our infringement notices through to their customers. The other 99.7% of the time, the notices went in the trash,” he adds.
    As part of the Copyright Alert System ISPs and copyright holders have agreed to send a limited number of notices per month, so anything above this threshold is not forwarded.
    ISTF’s data on the number of ‘Expendables 3′ infringements suggests that the Copyright Alerts are in fact less effective than the traditional forwarding schemes of other providers.
    Cox and Charter, two ISPs who do not participate in the Copyright Alert System, saw a 25.47% decrease in reported infringements between November 2014 and January 2015. However, the ISPs who sent six strikes notices saw a 4.54% increase over the same period.
    “These alarming numbers show that the CAS is little more than talking point utilized to suggest these five ISPs are doing something to combat piracy when in actuality, their customers are free to continue pirating content with absolutely no consequences,” Voltage Pictures CEO Nicolas Chartier notes.
    “As for its laughable six strikes policy, would any American retailer wait for someone to rob them six times before handing them an educational leaflet? Of course not, they call the cops the first time around,” he adds.
    While it’s clear that ISTF is not happy with the Copyright Alert System, they seem mistaken about how it works. Customers don’t have to be caught six times before they are warned, they get an educational notice the first time they’re caught.
    The “six strikes” terminology refers to the graduated response scheme, in which customers face stronger punishments after being caught more times.
    Interestingly, the filmmakers promote the Canadian notice-and-notice system as a better alternative. Since earlier this year, Canadian ISPs are obligated to forward infringement notices to their subscribers, and ISTF notes that it has been instrumental in decreasing piracy.
    Since the beginning of 2015, Bell Canada has seen a 69.6% decrease in infringements and Telus (54.0%), Shaw (52.1%), TekSavvy (38.3%) and Rogers (14.9%) all noted significant reductions.
    The data presented is collected by the monitoring outfit CEG TEK. This American company sends infringement notices paired with settlement requests on behalf of copyright holders, sometimes demanding hundreds of dollars from alleged pirates.
    Needless to say, these threats may in part be the reason for the reported effectiveness.
    In the United States, ISPs are currently not obliged to forward copyright infringement notices. Some ISPs such as Comcast do so voluntarily, but they also strip out the settlement demands.
    ISTF hopes this will change in the near future and the group has sent a letter to the MPAA, RIAA and the major ISPs urging them to expire the Copyright Alert System, and switch to the Canadian model instead.
    SOURCE
    • Upvote 1
  8. Youtuber sues google, viacom over content id takedowns
    An angry YouTuber says he has had enough of the way YouTube handles the DMCA and allegations of copyright infringement. In a lawsuit filed against Google, Viacom and Lionsgate, Benjamin Ligeri complains of restrictive practices which favor copyright holders using YouTube's Content ID system, even when claims are invalid.
    While in previous years people were simply grateful to have somewhere to host their own vides, these days a growing number of YouTube users rely on the site to generate extra cash.
    Earning money with YouTube is now easier than ever, with some ‘YouTubers’ even making enough to invest in a mansion.
    For others, however, the environment created by the Google-owned video platform is far from perfect, with complaints over the company’s Content ID anti-piracy system regularly making the news. Now YouTuber Benjamin Ligeri is adding his name to the disgruntled list.
    In a lawsuit filed at the US District Court for the District of Rhode Island which lists Google, Viacom, Lionsgate and another YouTuber as defendants, Ligeri bemoans a restrictive YouTube user contract and a system that unfairly handles copyright complaints.
    Ligeri says that he has uploaded content to YouTube under the name BetterStream for purposes including “criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and/or research,” but never in breach of copyright. Nevertheless, he claims to have fallen foul of YouTube’s automated anti-piracy systems.
    One complaint details a video uploaded by Ligeri which he says was a parody of the film The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo. It was present on YouTube for a year before a complaint was filed against it by a YouTube user called Egeda Pirateria.
    “Defendant Pirateria is not the rightful owner of the rights to The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, nor did the Plaintiff’s critique of it amount to copying or distribution of the movie,” Ligeri writes.
    However, much to his disappointment, YouTube issued a copyright “strike” against Ligeri’s account and refused to remove the warning, even on appeal.
    “YouTube, although Defendants Pirateria or Lion’s Gate lacked any legal claim
    to any copyright to The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, denied the Plaintiff’s appeal pertaining to his account’s copyright strike,” the complaint reads.
    Ligeri says Viacom also got in on the action, filing a complaint against his “critique” of the 2014 remake of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.
    “A claim was made with YouTube on behalf of Defendant Viacom. Defendant Viacom does not have a legal or valid copyright to TMNT. Defendant YouTube allowed Viacom the option to mute, disable or monetize the Plaintiff’s Fair Use content,” Ligeri adds.
    Although the fair use argument could be up for debate, in 2009 Nickelodeon acquired the global rights to the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles brand. Nickelodeon’s parent company is Viacom-owned Paramount Pictures.
    “Content ID is an opaque and proprietary system where the accuser can serve as the judge, jury and executioner,” Ligeri continues.
    “Content ID allows individuals, including Defendants other than Google, to steal ad revenue from YouTube video creators en masse, with some companies claiming content they don’t own deliberately or not. The inability to understand context and parody regularly leads to fair use videos getting blocked, muted or monetized.”
    Noting that YouTube exercises absolute power through its take-it-or-leave-it user agreement, Ligeri says the agreement and Content ID combined result in non-compliance with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
    “Normally, under DMCA, there would be a process where the reported content
    would be removed for 10-14 days so any dispute could be resolved by way of notice and counter-notice,” Ligeri writes.
    “Content ID and YouTube’s adhesion contract are not compliant with DMCA
    because, at a minimum, the software’s algorithm fails [to] recognize when content may or may not be violating copyright.”
    Ligeri says that rather than acting as a neutral party, YouTube favors larger copyright holders using Content ID over smaller creators who do not.
    “This software and YouTube’s terms of use circumvent DMCA by creating a
    private arbitration mechanism. Further, a party claiming copyright infringement has no burden of proof under this private arbitration mechanism,” he notes.
    In conclusion, Ligeri is demanding an injunction which compels Google/YouTube to restore the content taken down via the allegedly bogus complaints and “otherwise comply with the DMCA.”
    Ligeri also seeks declaratory judgments that he did not infringe the copyrights of the defendants and that YouTube’s terms of use are void on several counts, including that they ignore or fail to comply with the DMCA.
    A claim for nominal damages of $10,000, ‘special’ damages of $1,000,000 plus unspecified punitive damages and costs conclude the filing.
    This is not the first time Ligeri has personally targeted YouTube. In 2008 he unsuccessfully sued the company in an effort to obtain a 1/500th share in the revenue generated by the video site.
    The self-styled “#1 Most Viewed YouTube Icon” also appears to enjoy representing himself. In addition to the current case his Linkedin profile describes him as a “human rights activist private litigator” with previous experience working in a public defender’s office for the criminally insane.
    Source torrentfreak.com
    • Upvote 1
  9. GazelleGames:News
    Tracker IP has been updated. It will take a while for the DNS to propagate. If you're impatient, edit your hosts with:
    188.166.77.229
    [Discuss]
    --GGn Staff
    • Upvote 1
  10. Shutting Down Pirate Sites is Ineffective, European Commission Finds
    Shutting down pirate websites such as The Pirate Bay is high on the agenda of the entertainment industries. However, according to research published by the European Commission's Joint Research Centre, these raids are relatively ineffective and potentially counterproductive.
    A few years ago Europe witnessed the largest piracy-related busts in history with the raid of the popular movie streaming portal Kino.to.
    Police officers in Germany, Spain, France and the Netherlands raided several residential addresses, data centers and arrested more than a dozen individuals connected to the site.
    The operation wiped out the largest unauthorized streaming portal in Europe and was praised as a massive success. However, new research from the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre shows that the effect on end users was short-lived and relatively limited.
    In a working paper titled “Online Copyright Enforcement, Consumer Behavior, and Market Structure” researchers examined clickstream data for a set of 5,000 German Internet users to see how their legal and illegal consumption habits changed in response to the shutdown.
    One of the main conclusions is that the kino.to raid led to a short-lived decrease in piracy, after which piracy levels returned to normal. At the same time, the researchers observed only a small increase in the use of legal services.
    “While users of kino.to decreased their levels of piracy consumption by 30% during the four weeks following the intervention, their consumption through licensed movie platforms increased by only 2.5%,” the paper reads.
    Based on the above the researchers conclude that if the costs of the raids and prosecution are factored in, the shutdown probably had no positive effect.
    “Taken at face value, these results indicate that the intervention mainly converted consumer surplus into deadweight loss. If we were to take the costs of the intervention into account, our results would suggest that the shutdown of kino.to has not had a positive effect on overall welfare,” the researchers write.
    Perhaps more worrying is the fact that Kino.to was soon replaced by several new streaming services. This so-called “Hydra” effect means that a landscape which was previously dominated by one site, now consists of several smaller sites that together have roughly the same number of visitors.
    The researchers note that Movie2k.to and KinoX.to quickly filled the gap, and that the scattered piracy landscape would make future shutdowns more costly.
    “Our analysis shows that the shutdown of kino.to resulted in a much more fragmented structure of the market for unlicensed movie streaming,” the paper reads.
    “This potentially makes future law enforcement interventions either more costly – as there would not be a single dominant platform to shutdown anymore – or less effective if only a single website is targeted by the intervention”
    One of the policy implications could be to advise against these type of large piracy raids, as they do very little to solve the problem at hand.
    However, the researchers note that the results should be interpreted with caution. For example, it doesn’t include any data on offline sales. Similarly, back in 2011 there were relatively few legal options available, so the effects may be different now.
    That said, the current findings shed an interesting light on the limited effectiveness of international law enforcement actions directed at piracy sites. Also, it’s the first research paper we know of that provides strong evidence for the frequently mentioned Hydra effect.
    • Upvote 1
  11. CosaNostra News
    Assassin has the next 2 comps lined up.
    Below are the links to the competitions. Its a great way to get some easy mafia cash to spend, so if u havent already checked them out, follow the links!
    Guess Actor/Actress #17
    Movie Title Pictionary #25
    • Upvote 1
  12. FBI’s most-wanted man for digital piracy thinks he has solved illegal movie streaming
    Kim Dotcom and the movie industry don't exactly get along. Dotcom is wanted by the FBI for allegedly pirating millions of dollars' worth of copyrighted materials. You might remember when he had his house raided by authorities in 2012, when officials froze his bank accounts and confiscated much of his belongings because of the way his cloud storage service, Megaupload, was being used to make movies available online.
    Now, Dotcom says all that could've been avoided if only Hollywood had been smarter about distributing movies over the Internet. In an interview with Bloomberg, Dotcom says the film industry could have stopped digital piracy in its tracks if it had beaten Netflix at being Netflix:
    KIM DOTCOM: If Hollywood had some smart people — working for them, they would probably have the biggest Internet company on the planet.
    EMILY CHANG: So, explain to me how this — this great internet company out of Hollywood would work.
    KIM DOTCOM: Well, it's quite simple. If you have a content platform, let's say, that's owned by all these different studios combined, and they will make their product available, the entire catalogue, everything, at a fixed monthly fee, you know, for everyone to access around the world, working on every device — they would have the biggest — Internet success in history.
    What Dotcom's proposing is essentially a Hollywood-run repository of exclusive content that would host everything the industry produces. Instead of letting Netflix play the middleman, the studios would distribute their films digitally themselves.
    Could this idea curb online piracy? Dotcom thinks so, particularly if the online service allowed international viewers to watch new U.S. releases right away.
    "Extremism is if you are a Hollywood studio and you release your content in one country first, in the United States, and then roll it out over a couple of months in other countries around the world and expect the Internet community in all of these different countries to wait for the release," Dotcom told Bloomberg.
    Of course, even if this idea came to fruition, it wouldn't necessarily stop people from pirating content from other producers, such as HBO.
    • Upvote 1
  13. Mega slaps back – hard – at 'cyberlocker' accusations
    Mega has released a report today to rebut allegations the data storage and encryption company is a “cyberlocker” platform that’s specifically designed to enable the mass infringement of copyright and to share illegal content.
    The claims were made in September last year by UK-based online brand management agency NetNames in a report commissioned by the Digital Citizens Alliance, a US-based group backed by the Motion Picture Association of America.
    Called "Behind the Cyberlocker Door: A report on how shadowy cyberlocker businesses use credit card companies to make millions," it levelled a number of allegations against Mega, over its business model and the extent to which it complies with relevant legal and regulatory requirements.
    Those allegations ultimately resulted in political pressure being brought to bear on PayPal to sever its relationship with Mega, leaving the company without a method of processing online transactions.
    Now Mega has returned fire with a report of its own, commissioned from Olswang LLP, a London-based international law firm that specialises in technology, media and telecoms issues and anti-piracy advice.
    Olswang doesn’t mince words in its findings.
    “The allegations in the NetNames report are highly defamatory of Mega and appear to have no factual basis whatsoever,” the report says.
    “The NetNames report contains numerous factual inaccuracies and methodological errors and draws conclusions that are entirely wrong. In fact, Mega cannot be said to share a single one of the cyberlocker characteristics specified in the NetNames report.”
    In a statement, Mega chief executive Graham Gaylard said the company is “now taking legal advice on this serious attack against Mega.”
    Mega’s chief compliance officer, Stephen Hall, is under no illusions the new report is going to have an immediate effect.
    “This is just part of long process of proving our credentials and being accepted as part of the normal business world,” he says.
    “I wouldn’t bank on it causing any immediate change in [Pay-Pal et al’s] position but the parties we are working with will appreciate this confirmation of their assessment that we’re a legitimate business and they’re happy to work with us.”
    Those parties are global payment processing companies that Mega is aiming to have handle its online transactions, though Mr Hall declines to name any of them at this point.
    “We’ve signed up with some and are implementing solutions and we’re talking to others who are keen to do so,” he says. “The general strategy is to have a number of providers, rather than just one.”
    The speed with which these online transaction solutions are rolled to the 200-plus countries in which Mega is used will be necessarily staggered, Mr Hall says.
    “What’s appropriate for a credit card territory isn’t appropriate for one that lives on debit card or other online payment methods, and it varies quite widely in some parts of the world. So it will be customised for various territories.”
    Pay-Pal, Visa and Mastercard only received a copy of Olswang’s report at the same time it was publicly released this afternoon and are therefore not yet in a position to comment on its findings.
    • Upvote 1
  14. Top Bittorrent Tracker Pressured To Ban Infringing Hashes
    Demonii, the largest standalone BitTorrent tracker on the Internet, has been forced to ban more than 10,000 'copyright-infringing' torrent hashes. The blocking measures follow pressure from a music industry lawfirm applied to both the tracker and its hosting company. The tracker disagrees with the "bullying" tactics being employed.
    At any given point in time, millions of people are sharing files via BitTorrent. The most used trackers process millions of requests per minute, serving between 15 and 30 million people at once.
    SYNiCpY.jpg
    Demonii is one of these top BitTorrent trackers. The standalone tracker offers no torrents but merely coordinates communication between people who share files via sites such as The Pirate Bay.
    Technically speaking a tracker is similar to a DNS provider, it’s a ‘phone book’ which points people to content without knowing what it is. However, according to German lawfirm Rasch, trackers have a responsibility to block infringing hashes if they are asked to.
    Earlier this year the lawfirm took action against the hosting companies of several standalone trackers after they failed to block “infringing” hashes. The operator of Demonii, currently the most used BitTorrent tracker, informed us that they were contacted too.
    “First we received an email from Rasch asking us to remove about five torrent hashes for one music artist. Since the firm is merely an agent and not the actual copyright owner, I asked for proof that he is the lawful agent,” Demonii’s operator explains.
    The lawfirm provided the requested paperwork and to avoid problems with the hosting company, Demonii blocked the five hashes. This was the first time that Demonii had ever blocked content, which is nothing more than filtering a piece of HEX string.
    However, it soon became clear that Rasch was just getting started. In the weeks that followed the company filed complaints against 10,000 allegedly infringing hashes which pointed to content from various copyright holders.
    Again, Demonii requested proof that the firms was acting as a lawful agent, but this time Rasch declined. Instead, Rasch lawyer Mirko Brüß told the operator that anyone can report copyright infringements.
    “Anybody can notify you of an infringement, even if they are in no way affiliated with the rights owner. Please understand that we will not go above and beyond what is provided by the law in order to satisfy your personal requests,” Brüß wrote in an email.
    “It is your decision to act upon the information sent to you. But with regards to blocking content wrongfully, the content owners could approach us with claims for damages for sending a false notice to you,” he added.
    The Demonii operator disagrees with this assessment and calls out the claim as incorrect.
    “If what he is saying is right, in theory, I can go send an email to his hosting provider to remove their site? After all I am not the owner and no way legally affiliated, but I can still claim the take down?! — No.. I can’t, and neither should he,” he tells TF.
    However, with pressure shifting to the tracker’s hosting service (which had given the tracker 24 hours to comply), Demonii was eventually forced to block all reported hashes.
    Describing the lawfirm’s tactics as “bullying”, the operator decided to move away from its hosting company to one that may be more resistant to this type of pressure.
    “We have moved to a different hosting provider, one which we hope will take the matter more seriously and not just bend over backwards for any outrageous claim and takedown request where ownership can not be proven,” Demonii’s operator says.
    The previous hash blocks have also been lifted, so Demonii is starting over fresh and uncensored again. The move hasn’t stopped the lawfirm from sending more blocking requests, but for the time being the tracker is opting to ignore these.
    The tracker stresses that it respects copyright law. However, it will only respond to correct takedown notice and not to “bullying” tactics.
    Source :- TorrentFreak
    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.