Freeleech is activated

Google Translation: Update: NB v2 In this instance, we will shut down NB v1 while transferring data, As we have written, we will shut down NB v1 while moving the last data. Then we open for NB v2. we expect a down time of 1-2 hours. When you log on to NB, you are automatically logged on to NB v2. Here will be a login screen here You then have to enter your username and password and press. recover password An email will now be sent to the email address you have on NB, with the new password. Remember to check spam if mail is not in your inbox. You will then get a new login screen, where you enter your username and password you have received by mail and then press login. Then you are on NB v2 and can no longer access NB v1. But all this, you will be able to read more about when you log on to NB v2 for the first time.

Google Translation: NEW!!! DOWNLOAD CONTEST!!! Yes, you've heard right, we started a new download contest! We, IceTorrent staff, we thought of a contest at which all users can participate! So show us that you're the best! If you think your Hard Drive can handle this contest then don't lose too much time and participate ! Awards: - For each TB downloaded you'll receive one TB upload and the Special Vip Rank for one month. Contest rules: - To participate at this contest, you can download torrents from all categories except XXX torrents; - All downloaded torrents must to be kept at seed for at least 48 hours (if they are not kept at least 48 hours at seed, they won't be considered in this contest); - In order to participate at this contest you have to reply at this forum post; - In the moment that you post your intention of participating at this contest, you have to upload a screen shot with your download amount value (in order to see how much download GB/TB you had before joining the contest) and one screen shot with your download amount value at the end of the contest (in order to validate your downloaded amount). WARNING: we will check all your downloaded torrents to see if all of them respected the rules (the torrents that didn't followed the rules will be excluded from the contest); - The contest period is: 18.09.2019 - 18.10.2019. Before participating, please Read again the Rules and FAQ Don't lose any time and participate! Use your Hard Drive at it's best ! Don't forget: torrent seed is the key of success!

Millennium Films is utilizing the US court system to put pressure on sites, services and apps that are linked to piracy. After the shutdown of the popular CotoMovies app, the company has now switched its attention to several sites that were 'linked' to the app, including Verystream and Streamango. Millennium Films and its daughter companies have been rather active with their anti-piracy efforts in recent months. The movie companies have targeted some of the largest piracy apps and websites in court with the ultimate goal of shutting them down. Last week this resulted in a major success when the popular app CotoMovies decided to shut down. This was a direct result of legal pressure from Millennium Films which, in the process, brokered an unusual deal. In addition to shutting down and issuing a public apology, CotoMovies confirmed that it will share user data with the movie companies. According to the movie company’s attorney, Kerry S. Culpepper, this data can “more than likely” be used to go after users of the streaming piracy app. While no further details have emerged since, the CotoMovies aftermath continues. A few days ago Millennium Films obtained a subpoena which requires Cloudflare to hand over the personal details of people connected to several file-hosting and streaming sites. https://torrentfreak.com/images/cfstreamsub.png These targets include Verystream and Streamango, two very popular hosting services with millions of users each, which were reportedly used by CotoMovies to serve videos. The other sites, Fembed, VShare, Vidlox, Flix555, Streamplay, and 0123movies, all have a CotoMovies connection as well. “The above web domains have been identified as streaming copies of Owner’s motion picture(s) and supplying said streams to the piracy app ‘CotoMovies’,” Culpepper informed the Hawaii Federal Court. Culpepper requests the name, address, telephone, email, payment records, and IP address log history for each associated customer. This will likely be used to conduct follow-up investigations. The services and sites are informally accused of making Millennium’s copyrighted content available without permission. That said, it’s not clear whether the operators of these domains can be held directly liable. After all, most sites rely on user-uploaded content. Millennium, however, seems determined to keep digging for more information, perhaps hoping that more apps and services will fold. “Millennium greatly values their and other’s intellectual property. Millennium cannot keep making new movies if people steal Millennium’s movies through apps like these,” Millennium Media co-president Jonathan Yunger informed TorrentFreak last week, following the CotoMovies shutdown. — A copy of the subpoena directed at Cloudflare is available here (pdf). Source: Torrentfreak.com

Google Translation: Status Update: Tracker: Performance issues Update in progress Maintenance of the tracker Thanks for your understanding .

XXX - XXX - XXX - XXX OUR XXX CATEGORY HAS BECOME A REALITY! Read more about it here

Freeleech is ON until 22 Sep 2019 DoubleUpload is ON until 22 Sep 2019 Half Download is ON until 22 Sep 2019

Site is back and okay to login .

"When the winds of change blow, some build walls and others build windmills" Buckle up your belts and hold on tight! In the coming days there will be considerable changes to ratio, classes, rules, bonus points, site policies, and the overall structure of BeyondHD. These changes may or may not affect our members current class and associated perks and permissions, but no members will be left behind! It is essential that our community is aware and as updates occur, will be posted in BUG FIXES & FEATURE ENHANCEMENTS thread in the forums. Please keep yourselves informed and get ready for the future of BeyondHD! Any and all updates can and will be changed without any notice. As site policies and structure are amended, rules and faqs will be updated to reflect. We are aware that many people (including ourselves) do not like change. However, please understand that any change we make is designed to help improve the health of the community. All changes made only have this goal in mind and if you feel any change goes against this goal, please feel free to discuss it in a constructive manner. With that being said though, specific changes like ratio/classes are definitely changing but they MAY be adjusted if the health of the community requires it. Thank you for being part of our community and helping drive us Beyond HD! "We cannot become what we want by remaining what we are." — Max Depree

Global Freeleech mode activated! 3 days, 20 hours, 32 minutes, 09 seconds

Downtime due to database crash.

Crazyhour All torrents free and triple upload credit! starts in 20 Hours 24 Minutes 03 Seconds

M*******'s Birthday All Torrents Free Present from THC for m*******'s birthday set by B** Until 19 Sep 2019 (15:15:46 to go)

Crazyhour...All torrents free and triple upload credit! starts in 15:32:48

Next Happy Hour Starts Thursday 19th September 2019 at 8:31 am

A Danish court has ordered Internet provider Telenor to block access to the famous sports streaming site Rojadirecta. The order was requested by local anti-piracy group RettighedsAlliancen and Spanish football league La Liga. Rojadirecta, which filed its objections on paper without success, has yet to decide whether it will appeal. As one of the oldest and most prominent sports live-streaming portals, Rojadirecta is a thorn in the side of many international sports organizations. The linking site is operated by a Spanish company and initially had a good track record when it came to legal battles. Rojadirecta famously had its domain name returned after it was seized by the US Government years ago, and it has successfully fought off copyright holders in court. More recently, however, the tide began to turn. This year alone, Internet providers in several countries, including Ecuador and Peru, have been ordered to block the site. Last Friday, a court in Denmark did the same. The Danish case was handled by the local anti-piracy group RettighedsAlliancen, which worked in tandem with the Spanish Football League ‘La Liga‘. Earlier this year, they already managed to get blocking orders against nine other websites, but the court postponed a ruling on Rojadirecta. The reason for the delay was unusual. Contrary to pretty much every other website, Rojadirecta put up a defense. Among other things, the site argued that it’s not actively involved in selecting streaming links, as this happens automatically, and that many links actually point to authorized content. La Liga, however, countered that some of its content was definitely linked without permission, adding that Rojadirecta profits from facilitating copyright infringement. As such, it requested an injunction ordering local ISP Telenor to block the site. Telenor, which is the actual defendant, in this case, didn’t present any arguments. After reviewing the positions of La Liga and Rojadirecta, the court sided with the former. In its ruling late last week, the Court of Frederiksberg ordered Telenor to block the site. As is common in Denmark, this means that other ISPs will voluntarily follow suit. RettighedsAlliancen CEO Maria Fredenslund is happy with the outcome. It confirms that the blocking process is effective, she says, even when a targeted site puts up a defense. “Rojadirecta appeared in court and presented a defense but was convicted and blocked nonetheless – just like other illegal services. It stands to confirm that the blocking system works even if it is challenged, and of course we are very pleased with this,” Fredenslund says. Rojadirecta, on the other hand, is disappointed. A spokesperson informs TorrentFreak that it respects the outcome of the court proceeding. However, it is not happy with how RettighedsAlliancen and La Liga are selling it to the public. The site stresses that there is no ‘conviction’ of Rojadirecta. The case was a matter between the rightsholders and an ISP. The burden of proof in these cases is relatively low as the claimant only has to show that it’s likely that an infringement occurred, the site’s spokesperson notes. “The court has thus in the case merely made the assessment that RettighedsAlliancen has proven it likely that there have been illegal links at Rojadirecta and that the formal requirements for issuing a blocking injunction against the ISP were considered fulfilled,” Rojadirecta tells us. Rojadirecta further notes that it didn’t get much advance notice – Rettighedsalliancen informed the site little over a week before the hearing was scheduled. While the streaming link site managed to have a postponement put in place, it never had the chance to participate in an oral hearing. Instead, Rojadirecta was directed to submit its defense on paper. It’s clear that Rojadirecta is not pleased with the blockade and the site is still deliberating whether it will file an appeal. Aside from facing yet another ISP blockade, the damage for Rojadirecta as a business is minimal. The site has a relatively small userbase in Denmark, and since it wasn’t a defendant in the lawsuit, there are no damages that have to be paid. That could change if RettighedsAlliancen and La Liga file a case against the site directly, to decide whether it’s indeed operating illegally or not. We asked RettighedsAlliancen whether this was an option, but the group informed us that it has no comment on that for now. Rojadirecta is clear though. If RettighedsAlliancen and La Liga want the conviction they already claim they have, they need to fight the case on its merits. For now, however, the court found that there is enough ground to have Rojadirecta blocked in Denmark. According to local regulations the preliminary ruling will have to be followed up by a case of the merits. However, the targeted ISP may waive this, after which the order becomes permanent. — A copy of the order from the Court of Frederiksberg, obtained by TorrentFreak, is available here (pdf). Source: Torrentfreak.com

Downtime due to server issues (again).

Rebelsarea News - Freeleech

Google Translation: Notice! Notice to all users that all torrents will be on double upload at the site, this weekend from 2019.09.14 at 0:00 until 09.15 at 24:00!

Crazyhour All torrents free and triple upload credit! starts in 1d 02:51:03

Downtime due to server issues.

Tracker's Name: Boxing Torrents (TC-Boxing) Genre: Sports Sign-up Link:https://tc-boxing.com/signup.php Closing date: N/A Review's Link: Additional information: Boxing Torrents 3.0 is a Private Torrent Tracker for Boxing.

Copyright infringement is becoming a big issue in the United States, not least because those labeled "repeat infringers" could potentially have their home connections suspended temporarily or even shut down completely. So what are the rules at the major ISPs serving the country, in their own words? Every single week, Internet users in the United States take to Reddit and other discussion forums seeking advice about copyright infringement notices. Whether the claims against them are true is often hard to assess, but many speak of receiving notices from their ISP which state that a third-party has caught them torrenting something they shouldn’t – usually movies, TV shows, or music. While any and all of them are able to speak directly to their ISP to find out what the notices are all about and what the consequences might be, many seem confused. Are they going to be sued, for example, or perhaps their Internet might get suspended or cut off completely? Most advice dished out by fellow internet users is (and I’m paraphrasing), “Dumbass – use a VPN”, but while that comprehensively solves the problem, it doesn’t answer the big questions. A common topic is how many notices a customer can receive from their ISP before things get serious. One might think this basic information would be easy to find but despite most major ISPs in the US stating that they don’t allow infringement and there could be consequences for receiving multiple complaints, more often than not their information pages aren’t specific. So, in an effort to cut through all the jargon and put all the relevant information into one article, on August 27 we approached several of the major ISPs in the United States – Comcast, AT&T, Charter/Spectrum, Verizon, and CenturyLink – with a list of questions, detailed below; Your company forwards copyright complaints from rightsholders, based on their claims. How many complaints can a subscriber have made against their account before some action is taken by you, beyond simply forwarding the notice to the subscriber? What is the nature of that action, i.e requiring to confirm receipt of the notice, taking a copyright lesson, promising not to infringe again, etc? Once this stage has been completed, how many more complaints against an account will trigger any subsequent action, i.e a more serious warning, warning that an account could be suspended etc? At what point would a customer with multiple complaints against their account be considered a ‘repeat infringer’? At what point could an account holder expect a temporary account suspension? At this point, how would that suspension be lifted? At what point could an account holder expect a complete termination of his or her service? In respect of points 5 and 6, is the number of complaints a deciding factor or does a subscriber’s negative or positive responses and actions in respect of your efforts to prevent infringement also play a part? Are you able to confirm that accounts have been temporarily suspended for repeat infringement and if so, how many? Are you able to confirm that accounts have been permanently shut down for repeat infringement and if so, how many? We told the ISPs exactly why we were asking these questions and indicated that a response within seven days would guarantee their inclusion in this article. We extended the deadline to two weeks and beyond but not a single company listed above responded to any of our questions. In fact, none even acknowledged receipt of our initial email, despite one ISP requiring us to send emails to at least three people involved in their media communications team. It seems fairly clear this potato is simply too hot to pick up. That being said, we thought we should press on with at least trying to help subscribers. There are usually very few valid excuses for receiving multiple copyright infringement complaints. Some do exist, of course, but not knowing the precise mechanism for being dealt with under various ISPs’ ‘repeat infringer’ rulesets only makes matters worse. What we can do here is give relevant snippets/quotes from each ISP’s website and link to the page(s) in question, with a comment here and there. In no particular order: AT&T: In accordance with the DMCA and other applicable laws, AT&T maintains a policy that provides for the termination of IP Services, under appropriate circumstances, if Customers are found to be a repeat infringer and/or if Customers’ IP Services are used repeatedly for infringement (the ‘Repeat Infringer Policy’). AT&T may terminate IP Services at any time with or without notice to Customers. AT&T has no obligation to investigate possible copyright infringements with respect to materials transmitted by Customer or any other users of the IP Services. However, AT&T will process valid notifications of claimed infringement under the DMCA, and continued receipt of infringement notifications for Customer’s account will be used as a factor in determining whether Customer is a repeat infringer. TF note on AT&T: We can find no “Repeat Infringer Policy” CenturyLink: Company respects the intellectual property rights of others and is committed to complying with U.S. copyright laws, including the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (‘DMCA’). Company reserves the right to suspend or terminate, in appropriate circumstances, the service of users whose accounts are repeatedly implicated in allegations of copyright infringement involving the use of Company’s network. TF note: We have no idea what constitutes “appropriate circumstances.” Comcast/Xfinity: Any infringement of third party copyright rights violates the law. We reserve the right to treat any customer account for whom we receive multiple DMCA notifications from content owners as a repeat infringer. We reserve the right to move a customer account to the next step of the policy upon receiving any number of DMCA notifications from content owners in a given month, or upon learning that the account holder is a repeat infringer. You may receive an email alert to the preferred email address on your account or a letter to your home address. You may also receive an in-browser notification, a recorded message to your telephone number on file, a text message to your mobile telephone number on file, or another form of communication. Triggering steps under this policy may result in the following: a persistent in-browser notification or other form of communication that requires you to log in to your account or call us; a temporary suspension of, or other interim measures applied to, your service; or the termination of your Xfinity Internet service as well as your other Xfinity services (other than Xfinity Mobile). TF note on Comcast: The ‘repeat infringer’ policy is quite detailed and worth the long read. Cox Communications: Cox encourages responsible internet use. Our internet use policy is consistent with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and allows us to take steps when we receive notifications of claimed infringement. Repeated notifications of claimed violations on your account could lead to Internet service suspension or termination. If you continue to receive copyright infringement notifications on your account, Cox suspends your Internet service. In the Customer Portal, you may reactivate your Internet service up to two times. If your account continues to receive copyright infringement notifications, your Internet service is terminated. TF note on Cox: The repeat infringer policy is worth a read and is quite specific in parts, less so in others. Spectrum/Charter: TF initial note: The company doesn’t appear to have a dedicated ‘repeat infringer’ policy outside of its published “copyright violation” advice. While this is both detailed and helpful in many respects, it doesn’t give specifics on alleged ‘repeat infringers’. After noting that “Charter may suspend or disconnect your service as a result of repeat copyright violations,” users are sent to its Acceptable Use Policy page, which reads in part as follows: Spectrum reserves the right to investigate violations of this AUP, including the gathering of information from the Subscriber or other Users involved and the complaining party, if any, and the examination of material on Spectrum’s servers and network. Spectrum prefers to advise Users of AUP violations and any necessary corrective action but, if Spectrum, in its sole discretion, determines that a User has violated the AUP, Spectrum will take any responsive action that is deemed appropriate without prior notification. Such action includes but is not limited to: temporary suspension of service, reduction of service resources, and termination of service. Verizon: Pursuant to Section 512 of the DMCA, it is Verizon’s policy to terminate the account of repeat copyright infringers in appropriate circumstances. TF note: This appears to be the shortest ‘repeat infringer’ Policy of all the ISPs and is a good example of why we decided to ask all of the companies for their precise steps, so we could offer a little more detail to their customers. Sorry, we failed, but there’s probably a good reason for that. Summary: With several ISPs up to their necks in lawsuits filed by the RIAA alleging that they haven’t done enough to deal with “repeat infringers”, it’s perhaps no surprise that the companies ignored our requests for information. That being said, it’s of interest that several appear to be acting in a particularly vague manner – perhaps they’re already worrying that they’ll be next on the music industry’s list. In the meantime and in most cases, users will remain largely in the dark unless they do a lot of reading and research. And even that might not be enough. Source: Torrentfreak.com

Crazyhour...All torrents free and triple upload credit! starts in 1:29:43

Google Translation: Warning: The site has closed visitors! Logged in users please do not clean cookies or change browsers! ! !