Downtime: Server is down

Think a lot of people will find this useful

Welcome to InviteHawk . Please remember to read the rules and have fun

Welcome to InviteHawk . Please remember to read the rules and have fun

Welcome to InviteHawk . Please remember to read the rules and have fun

Welcome to InviteHawk . Please remember to read the rules and have fun

Tracker Name: P2P Elite Genre: E Learning Sign Up Link: https://www.p2pelite.com/signup.php Closing Time: Soon Additional Information: E-learning tracker

Welcome to InviteHawk Please remember to read the rules and have fun.

SOURCE: Torrentfreak.com Cloud torrenting services are an ideal tool to download content swiftly. They also help to hide your IP-address from the public at large. However, are they really anonymous? We asked the leading cloud torrenting services what their policies are. Every day, millions of people download files through BitTorrent. This works well but there is one major drawback; everything you download can be tracked. To bypass this privacy concern many people have started to use VPNs, many of which provide good anonymity. Others prefer cloud torrenting tools, which also help to hide users’ IP-addresses. Over the past few years we’ve regularly asked VPN providers how anonymous they really are. However, little is known about the privacy policies and logging practices of cloud torrenting services. Today, we hope to fill this gap. At the start of the week we reached out to several of the leading cloud torrenting services to ask some detailed questions. In particular, we wanted to know what information they store and if that can expose users. The list of all questions, including the answers from providers, is listed below. At the bottom of the article we provide a summary, as well as a list of those who failed to respond at all. — 1. Does your service collect any temporary or permanent data that can link a timestamp and IP-address to a specific user on your service? If so, what information do you collect and how long is that stored? 2. Does your service store any personally identifiable information of users (including IP-addresses)? If so, what information do you store, and for how long? 3. Does your service store the names/hashes or other identifying information of downloaded content (stored on your servers) that can be connected with a specific user? If so, for how long? 4. Does your service store the names/hashes or other identifying information of previously downloaded content (after being removed from the user’s account) that can be connected with a specific user? If so, for how long? 5. How does your service respond to DMCA notices or similar takedown requests? 6. Do you have a repeat infringer policy? If so, what does it entail? — Premiumize 1. No, we don’t log any IP access data. Our whole service is built to have minimal logging and is very light on the database level. That keeps things simple. 2. The most unique userkey is the user’s email address. We keep that for obvious reasons – to secure the account and reach the user. We keep it until the account is deleted. Apart from that we don’t store anything, but other information might be stored by our payment gateways. Nothing really can be done there except moving to Bitcoin – which we support and love. 3. There are two parts to our service. One is for fetching (eg a transfer job for importing the files into cloud storage) and then there’s the actual cloud storage. There is obviously a database that links the files to the user’s account but that connection is gone once the user deletes(removes) the file from their cloud. We cannot restore files and cannot backtrack who added/transferred what. 4.No, we do not. 5. Luckily we don’t have this problem since our business model does not contain any sort of sharing or publishing. Generated filelinks are locked to the user’s account and cannot be accessed externally. 6. We do not and it would be pretty hard since we do not have the logs. For now, we are content with the current legal situation. — TorrentFreak summary: There are no logs that can connect a person’s IP-address to an account. Premiumize can link files to user accounts and information — Transfercloud 1. The last IP address is registered when the user logs on and it is cleared when the user logs out. This IP is only used to permit access to their downloaded files, and it is correlated with the login cookie. This is temporary and the privacy of the user is assured when they logout. The email is used to register and as an account recovery mechanism. 2. Each account is associated with an email address. Even though we frown on ‘temporary’ or ‘disposable’ emails, we make no effort in collecting the real name. In fact, if the user logs in with a Facebook account and refuses to share their email address, we don’t store any address at all. Email is only used to ensure the ownership of the account and allow users to ‘recover’ their own account and not be available for anyone else. At any point, users can change their email address or delete it. Also, at any point any user can ask for account deletion and all information will be purged on request. We are working on adding an automatic mechanism for this. Now, if the user upgrades their account, our payment processor asks for PII to ensure the identity of the user to protect against credit card fraud. This information STAYS on their servers and is not available from ours. We don’t use that information at all, we just receive the activation for a specific account. 3. See the next answer. 4. On all active or previous transfers the original request is stored as long as the user leaves them on their ‘downloaded’ list. As soon as they clear this list, that information is purged and can no longer be connected with the user. 5. We respond as soon as the request is received. We delete the referred content and comply, informing the user why it was deleted and suggesting they do not try downloading any copyrighted content. 6. We have not had to enforce any “repeat infringer” policies, but we do not disclose the limits we would consider as abuse to avoid users trying to “pass below the radar”. To be clear, although we do have a “fair use” policy for bandwidth usage, we have not had to impose any limits, as we try to permit the users to use the service to their maximum potential, and instead, we are really happy to see users enjoy it that much. — TorrentFreak summary: There are temporary logs that can connect a person’s IP-address to an account. TransferCloud can link non-deleted files and download histories to user accounts and information — Put.io 1. Since we are a Turkish company we are required to abide by Turkish laws, which are more concerned about curtailing free speech than privacy. And since there is no speech at put.io we’re not keeping a list of [‘all’] used IP addresses. We do keep the last used IP address to generate a download token that invalidates download links when requested from other IP addresses. We keep this last IP address as long as the user is logged in. It is erased when the user logs out or is inactive for 7 days. This is a precaution against abuse. We are currently working on a solution that will make it unnecessary to keep the last IP address. 2. We keep the username, reported email address and the last IP address for the purpose explained above. We have no access to users’ payment information. These are stored by our payment providers 3. There is an association with the account and the transfer jobs as long as they are displayed on the transfers page, and there is an association between the account and the files as long as they are stored under that account. There is also a history page that lists the latest transfer jobs, but it can be turned off. These associations disappear the moment the transfers page is cleared, the files are deleted or the history page is cleared (or disabled). We wouldn’t be able to answer the question “What has this user downloaded?” after that. Also, if the user ever destroys their account, we destroy everything related to the account. The only record we keep is a log entry that states that an account with that username was destroyed on that date. We had to add this to solve some mysteries with unintended account deletions. 4. No. If it’s not visible in the user interface we don’t keep it. 5. After 10 years in operation we have received only one DMCA request and that was meant for another service called Putlocker. The copyright holder had mixed up the services. We don’t receive DMCA requests, but if we ever did, we would comply and remove the content from our servers. That would be the end of it. 6. We have never had to develop a policy to deal with this. TorrentFreak summary: There are temporary logs that can connect a person’s IP-address to an account. Put.io can link the non-deleted files and download history to user accounts and information. — Summary: How Anonymous Are Cloud Torrenting Services Cloud torrenting services help people to hide their IP-addresses from the public. By doing so, they add an extra privacy layer. Outsiders can’t see what people download. However, true anonymity is a different matter. The services can link stored files – and in some cases non-deleted download histories – to the personal information they store in their database. In that regard, they are similar to cloud hosting services. This is worth keeping in mind, as services can be compromised or legally required to share information. Cloud Torrenting Services That Haven’t Responded (fully) The following services didn’t respond to our questions. If they do, we will update the article accordingly. Bitport submitted a partial response after our deadline, we will add the full response if it comes in. We also attempted to reach out to Real-Debrid, but the site doesn’t list any contact options.

No it doesnt ahve audio books,. this is for music producers. If you are looking for audio books i would reccommend myanonamouse, they are the gold standard for audiobooks. I have an invite for this too that i would trade for the right tracker Cheers

Ill PM you shortly buddy, yes this is still available

Welcome to InviteHawk. Please remember to read the rules and have fun.

Welcome to InviteHawk. Please remember to read the rules and have fun.

Welcome to InviteHawk. Please remember to read the rules and have fun.

Up to the top.

Going with Linux but it would depend on what im using it for, id use linux all the time if more things worked on it

The summer of '69

SOURCE: Torrentfreak.com Cox Communications' request to lower the massive piracy liability verdict issued by a Virginia jury has failed. The request for a new trial was denied as well. However, the court does agree that the damages should be issued per work if there are multiple copyrights involved, which means that the $1 billion figure may go down. Last year, Internet provider Cox Communications lost its legal battle against a group of major record labels. Following a two-week trial, a Virginia jury held Cox liable for its pirating subscribers, ordering the company to pay $1 billion in damages. Heavily disappointed by the decision, Cox later asked the court to set the jury verdict aside and decide the issue directly. In addition, the ISP argued that the “shockingly excessive” damages should be lowered. If that wasn’t an option, Cox wanted a new trial. These requests were fiercely opposed by the record labels and, after weighing the evidence from both sides, US District Court Judge Liam O’Grady decided over the matter this week. O’Grady’s 75-page opinion is mostly bad news for Cox. It starts by discussing the motion for judgment as a matter of law, which argues that the jury verdict should be set aside in exchange for a verdict by the court. The court, however, sees no reason to fully grant this. Cox argued that the evidence presented during trial doesn’t show that the ISP is liable for direct or secondary copyright infringement. The court disagrees. For example, when it comes to vicarious infringement, the record shows that Cox directly benefited from pirating subscribers. “Here, there was ample evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude, as this jury did, that Cox gained some direct financial benefit from the infringement, no matter how small,” Judge O’Grady writes. “The Court agrees with Plaintiffs’ argument that Cox’s treatment of repeat infringer accounts suffices as a causal connection between the infringement and financial gain. Internal emails among Defendants clearly establish a connection between infringing accounts and continued collection of revenue rather than termination.” While the vast majority of Cox’s arguments “fall flat,” according to Judge O’Grady, there is a small win for the ISP as well, one that could have large financial consequences. The court agrees with the ISP that damages should be issued per ‘work’ and not for each ‘copyright.’ There are 10,017 copyrights listed in the case which were multiplied by $99,3830 in damages per work, which led to the final figure of $1 billion. However, that should be adjusted as there are some overlapping works as well, where one song is covered by multiple copyrights. The court explains that infringers shouldn’t be punished multiple times for one pirated track simply because there are more copyrights related to it. As an example, Judge O’Grady mentions mashups where tracks can easily have 20 different copyright holders. “It is difficult to fathom that Congress intended such dramatic discrepancies in liability for substantially the same conduct. As willful infringement exposes the defendant to a maximum of $150,000 per work infringed, that three-minute mash-up could cost a defendant $3 million,” Judge O’Grady writes. This means that Cox can go over the list of copyrights in the suit to see how many ‘works’ these cover. This could be substantially less than the 10,017 copyrights previously indicated. Moving on, the court reviewed the scale of the damages, which was set at $99,3830 per work. Cox summed up a list of arguments why this “historic” amount is “shockingly” excessive. However, the court notes that the amount wasn’t grossly excessive in light of the evidence. There was no “miscarriage of justice,” as Cox claims. The ISP knew very well what the requirements of the DMCA are, what the possible statutory damages could be, and how many works were infringed. “As there is no potential ambiguity in construing the statutory dollar amounts, and Cox was keenly aware of the volume of infringement notices it received, the product of these two values was reasonably foreseeable,” Judge O’Grady notes. “In sum, Plaintiffs were well within their rights to elect both a jury trial and statutory damages. After significant deliberation, the jury awarded $99,830.29 per work, well within the Act’s statutory range of $750.00-$150,000.00.” All in all, this means that the damages per work stay the same. Cox is not entitled to a new trial but the $1 billion damages award may be lowered based on the number of works that have more than one copyright. — A copy of US District Court Judge Liam O’Grady’s Memorandum Opinion and Order is

@Korsan-X unforutunately they seemed to have ended the registration period less than a day after i put it up. I dont have the ability to edit the post to inform p[eople @Forum Moderator please can this thread be marked as closed? The registration is no longer open Cheers

Japan's parliament has passed amendments to copyright law that aim to prevent illegal downloading of manga, magazines and other texts. Set to be implemented in two phases, the new framework also outlaws so-called 'leech sites' that provide links to copyrighted content hosted elsewhere. Eight years ago, Japan passed legislation that made it illegal to download unlicensed movies and music from the Internet. The move to criminalize this activity with a prison sentence of up to two years received a general welcome from copyright holders. However, rightsholders offering other types of content felt left out. Ever since they’ve called for the law to be expanded to include manga (local comics) and other literary works. Fines and Prison Sentences For Downloaders This week and after years of work, their goals were achieved. Japan’s parliament passed new copyright amendments Friday that ban the unlicensed downloading of manga, magazines and academic texts from the Internet, in line with the previously outlawed media categories. In common with the penalties already available for movies and music, those illegally downloading publications from the Internet now face a theoretical sentence of two years in prison or a fine of up to two million yen (US$18,300). The new downloading law will come into effect on January 1, 2021, but there will be some exceptions. Those who download a small section of a manga publication or a handful of pages from a larger book, for example, will not face prosecution. After protests over the strict nature of an early draft of the law, people who accidentally include copyrighted works in screenshots will also avoid breaking the law. New Criminal Penalties For ‘Leech Site’ Operators Other amendments passed Friday including the outlawing of so-called “leech” sites. Outside Japan, these are often called indexing or linking sites since they host no copyrighted content themselves but link to external platforms or users that do. These have previously proven a thorn in the side of local copyright holders who previously claimed that around 200 were operating with impunity in the country. As of October 1, 2020, however, site operators or those publishing apps that have the same function will face the harshest sentences available under the law. Such offenses will carry a sentence of up to five years in prison, a maximum fine of five million yen (US$45,760), or in some cases, both. New Legislation Overcame Significant Hurdles to Become Law In early 2019, the Cultural Affairs Agency proposed an expansion of the law to cover all copyrighted content but things didn’t go smoothly. Opponents argued that the proposed legislation was too tight and could even meet the private copying of images with a prison sentence. Due to these and similar fears, the amendments were eventually shelved. This led to the production of an amended bill that received approval in March. Passed by parliament this week, the government says that the amendments represent a fair yet effective compromise. Source: Torrentfreak.com

Welcome to InviteHawk . Please remember to read the rules and have fun

Welcome to InviteHawk . Please remember to read the rules and have fun

Welcome to InviteHawk . Please remember to read the rules and have fun

Welcome to InviteHawk . Please remember to read the rules and have fun

Tracker Name: Extremlym Torrents (XTR Torrents) Genre: HD movies / TV / XXX Review (If Any) https://www.invitehawk.com/topic/118015-extremlymtorrentsws-xtrtorrentsws-xtr-general-2019-4k-xxx-bluray-review Sign Up Link: https://xtrtorrents.ws/account-signup.php Closing Time: N/A Additional Information: Good source for 4K / xxx releases