Oppaiti.me News Site is down. The server is not responding.

JPTV.club News Global Freeleech Mode Activated! 29 days, 22 hours, 22 minutes, 28 seconds

ILoveTorzz News FREELEECH is activated ILT Global Freeleech Month Active! ### ILT Global Freeleech Month Active! ### Hello members ILT Global Freeleech Month Active! - every day in December is now freeleech no download stats recorded, only upload

The Recording Industry Association of America runs into some pushback after objecting to a tool that creates permanent copies of YouTube content. That YouTube is a great place to access free content is known by most. But is the extremely popular video-sharing website also the place to go to download? That’s a question provoking controversy and could set the stage for the industry’s next big copyright fight. The subject of the developing battle is youtube-dl, a third-party software tool that enables its users to rip videos and songs from the Google-owned platform. Illegal? Not necessarily, say proponents of the tool. Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act prohibits circumvention of technological measures designed to protect access to copyrighted works. But if there's no circumvention, then there's no Section 1201 violation. And some are questioning whether YouTube has really presented roadblocks. Youtube-dl is “a lot like the videocassette recorders of decades past: a flexible tool for saving personal copies of video that’s already accessible to the public,” wrote Elliot Harmon and Mitch Stoltz of the nonprofit digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation in a November post. EFF is now representing Github, a community of software developers. Upon a takedown notice by the Recording Industry Association of America, Github removed source code for youtube-dl, but then on Nov. 16, Github turned heads by restoring youtube-dl after EFF gave its opinion about the technology at hand. What’s more, Github made its stand by establishing a $1 million developer defense fund. The developing fight has the potential to be a consequential one both for the entertainment industry and beyond. Section 1201 has been around for a quarter-century and has been explored a few times in court — most notably when the movie industry fought to ensure that no one cracked encryption and made permanent computer copies of DVDs and Blu-Rays. That said, copyright experts say that what constitutes an illegal “circumvention” is largely untested in American courts. What's more, with auto owners, smart phone owners and others now complaining that copyright law prevents them from tinkering, Congress has taken a renewed interest in 1201. Recently, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) has highlighted the need for reform, commenting, "I’m looking forward to our Section 1201 hearing this month because my sense is that we may need to tweak that provision to ensure that the exemptions adequately account for consumer concerns, including by allowing for third-party repair of software-enabled devices." As for the Section 1201 debate around youtube-dl, the conversation confronts so-called "stream-ripping," a phenomenon that some in the industry worry will erode revenue. Given that streaming platforms have largely supplanted file-sharing hubs this century, it makes sense that access control has become a focal point. Taking steps like a crack down on password sharing is one part of the picture. The industry is also waging a quiet legal war against illegal streaming boxes, pirate IPTV and, now, rippers. However, this latest debate is somewhat unusual as it involves some analysis of the underpinnings of a mainstream site like YouTube. And Google, which owns YouTube, is being very careful about speaking out on the subject, for it has the potential of disrupting its relationships in the content and technology space. As EFF explains it, YouTube employs a “completely visible” mechanism in order to deliver video streaming to someone’s web browser. “To borrow an analogy from literature, travelers come upon a door that has writing in a foreign language,” explain EFF’s lawyers. “When translated, the writing says, “[S]ay ‘friend’ and enter.” The travelers say ‘friend’ and the door opens. As with the writing on that door, YouTube presents instructions on accessing video streams to everyone who comes asking for it.” The RIAA has a completely different take on the technology at hand. As the RIAA sees it, YouTube's coding is akin to the encryption on DVDs preventing anyone from storing a movie on their computer hard drive. “EFF is misguided,” says Ken Doroshow, RIAA’s chief legal officer. “Youtube-dl and other programs that are designed to circumvent YouTube's rolling cipher clearly violate Section 1201. Several courts in the EU have already ruled that the rolling cipher is an effective technological measure that controls access to copyrighted works. We are confident that U.S. courts would arrive at the same conclusion.” YouTube may present a particularly low barrier to anyone who wishes to grab downloadable content, but as obvious as its coding may be, copyright holders say YouTube's content system still represents something that must be deciphered in order to download. To borrow the EFF analogy, nobody’s saying “friend” to open YouTube's door unless there’s a translator in tow to interpret the foreign language. Thus far, two European courts have sided with the RIAA. The first in 2017 was a regional judge in Hamburg, Germany, who analyzed a service that ripped MP3s from YouTube. The judge granted the recording industry group’s requested injunction. The second decision came in Denmark last March and may be most notable for including a declaration from a lawyer working inside Google’s German office. Although YouTube hasn’t publicly commented on the recent controversy surrounding youtube-dl, this Google attorney told the Danish court, “In order to prevent unauthorized downloads on a technical level, YouTube implements so-called ‘cipher’ technology to mitigate unauthorized access to YouTube content.” (Also, Google isn’t above sending its own 1201 notices. Last month, for example, Google complained to Github about tools being used to get around Widevine, its digital rights management technology being used by Disney+, Netflix, Amazon Prime Video and others in distributing videos.) Still, EFF expresses hope that the conclusion of an American court would be different. In its letter advising Github, Stoltz writes, “The 2017 decision of the Hamburg Regional Court in Germany that RIAA references … was wrongly decided and is not binding nor even persuasive under U.S. law. The court in that case apparently reasoned that since the judge was not familiar with JavaScript, using the ‘signature’ code was beyond the capabilities of the average user … The court’s analysis overlooks the ubiquity of JavaScript, which is embedded in every browser … making use of the ‘signature’ mechanism well within the capabilities of the average user.” Although Section 1201 of the DMCA has been around for almost a quarter-century, stream-ripping has only recently instigated lawsuits and the "average user" theory hasn't been tested. (That said, there’s already an RIAA case concerning 1201 before the Supreme Court at the moment on the issue of jurisdiction.) Thus far, no defendant has mounted the type of truly vigorous pushback being teased by Github and EFF. That said, 1201 is a broadly written statute, and according to Sy Damle — a Latham & Watkins partner who formerly was general counsel for the U.S. Copyright Office — the statute “doesn’t require the protection measure to be particularly sophisticated.” Aaron Moss, a partner at Greenberg Glusker, agrees, although he notes that past courts have previously ruled that if one uses a publicly available password, one isn’t circumventing access control measures. Like other interested observers, Moss sees the rise of streaming platforms and those looking to rip a little extra access, and says, “1201, being more amorphous and less litigated that traditional takedown notices, is likely to become a new frontier in the cat and mouse game.”

Close to 12 million French internet users consumed pirated content last year, representing a loss of earnings of €1.03 billion to rights holders, according to figures released by the Haute autorité pour la diffusion des oeuvres et la protection des droits sur internet (Hadopi), the body set up over a decade ago to combat piracy. According to the Hadopi, €310 million was lost to physical media sales while pay TV services lost to the tune of €260 million. The cost to the public purse in the form of lost tax revenues and charges was €332 million. The Hadopi’s study, the first to attempt to calculate the economic consequences of content piracy and illicit retransmission of sports events in the round, comes as proposals for a new audiovisual law designed to tackle the problem are being discussed. The Hadopi found that while peer-to-peer piracy – the original focus of the Hadopi when it was set up – had declined significantly, illegal streaming and direct download of content had risen and new forms of illegal consumption such as illicit IPTV and live streaming services had also blossomed. While the number of internet users engaged in piracy has barely changed over the last decade, the proportion has declined as more people have come online. Some 80% of those consuming illicit content view movies illegally, with 73% viewing TV series and 50% consuming live sports. Denis Rapone, president of the Hadopi, called for detailed examine of the provisions of the country’s audiovisual law designed to combat piracy and said that “the situation is critical but solutions exist. We are absolutely ready to put them to work in the service of improved public policy for the protection of content creation.” Aurore Bergé, a deputy for the ruling LREM party, has proposed new legislative measures to tackle piracy with the support of culture minister Roselyne Bachelot, but this has so far struggled to secure parliamentary time in the face of the public health crisis.

Latvian State Police have detained three individuals suspected of illegally distributing pay-TV signals in the capital Riga and environs. In a statement, they say that in the course of their investigation “injured parties” to these activities, or more specifically “at least two representatives of television programs or subjects of related rights”, suffered losses amounting to at least €19,680. They add that the individuals face the prospect of up to four years in prison, temporary custodial sentence, forced labour or a fine.

WH official opening day 1/1/21 WH will announce about official time of Tracker Opening, it will be on 1/1/21 so if u have any Issue to consider for your account, We can solve it before this date - Again WH releases aren't Free, if you search for free Releases you have historical releases as NWCHD, Star, Heel. Feel Free to Enjoy With WH torrents.

BroadcasTheNet News Tracker Unstable

TorrentBytes News Free Leech Time 2020-12-04 07:00:00 - 2020-12-06 23:59:59 2 days remaining (Please do not hit 'n' run, keep the torrents seeded)

Santa Claus game + 90,000th bet Nice people! Santa came to you again this year. Most of you already know him well, and others will probably get to know him soon. What is new to all of them, however, is that the daily Santa chase is not limited to 5 options. Once you have 5, you can call Santa again for some bonus points! We hope you enjoy it! ---------------- The 90,000th bet in the betting game has been announced! You can play at this link. Everyone who plays at least one bet in the game will receive 90 bonuses and 90 HnRs. The first 3 places will receive an extra prize: 900 HnR, 900 bonus, and 90GiB upload credit. We wish everyone a good game! Staff

TheHorrorCharnel (THC) News FreeLeech ON All Torrents Free Thanks to donations! set by m*** Until 11 Dec 2020 (6d 22:23:25 to go)

The server has been updated, thanks to all the internal staff for their selfless donations. The invitation system has been reopened. This Saturday and Sunday there's sitewide freeleech for two days. We wish you all a happy weekend!

welcome to IH, enjoy your stay

We will have a Christmas Sitewide Freeleech for the holidays! Please celebrate with us the most wonderful time of the year. Cheers! The event will start at 08:00 (UTC) 14th December 2020 and will end at 08:00 (UTC) 25th December 2020. UTC=Universal Time Coordinated=GMT Note: ALL Torrents uploaded before this announcement are Freeleech! ALL Torrents uploaded after this announcement are Freeleech! Neutral Leech torrents will remain Neutral Leech. Torrents will return to their previous leech status after this event ends. Torrents uploaded during the event will revert to Normal Leech after this event ends.

PixelCove News Sitewide Freeleech for 1 month, 2 hours (until Jan 04 2021, 00:00)

Update Dec 4th We are not quite at 100% yet but functional enough to use the site. We'll continue to work on the site. When we are done, we'll provide an update to everyone on what occurred. Happy torrenting!

The Association for the Protection of Copyright on the Internet (AZAPI) has filed complaints with Russia's Federal Antimonopoly Service against Internet giants Yandex and Mail.ru. According to AZAPI, granting some rightsholders access to tools that remove links to pirated copies from search results while denying the same to publishers amounts to an abuse of their dominant market positions. Every week, millions of Internet users turn to search engines hoping to find links to pirated content. Not to so long ago, this could prove effective but in recent years things have changed. Massive delisting operations to remove billions of links using copyright law have been supported by voluntary initiatives by Google, for example, to downgrade sites for which lots of DMCA complaints are received. As a result, basic searches tend to yield often disappointing results, albeit with some exceptions. Delistings in Russia As Part of a Voluntary Agreement In 2018, leading content companies and distributors plus Yandex, Rambler Group, Mail.Ru Group, vKontakte, and RuTube signed up to a landmark anti-piracy memorandum. Supported by the creation of a centralized database of allegedly-infringing content, Internet platforms agreed to voluntarily query the resource in close to real-time to identify and then delete ‘pirate’ links from their search indexes. Although the Russians have a different approach, they have the same goal as copyright holders in the US and Europe – to make pirated content harder to find in search results. However, unlike the DMCA’s takedown rules and their EU equivalents, this voluntary scheme is currently biased towards large copyright holders involved in video content, with others – such as publishers – excluded. Publishers File Complaints With the Federal Antimonopoly Service Under the umbrella of the Association for the Protection of Copyright in the Internet (AZAPI), major publishers are determined to change this by being heard at the highest levels. Documents obtained by Vedomosti reveal that 15 of the largest publishing houses including Eksmo and AST (which together control 30% of the market), Alpina Publisher, Hachette subsidiary Azbuka Atticus, Mann, plus Ivanov and Ferber, have filed complaints with the Federal Antimonopoly Service alleging anti-competitive behavior by Yandex and Mail.ru. Yandex Should Eliminate Unfair Competition From Search Results Signed by AZAPI chief Maxim Ryabyko, the complaints demand an order that would require Yandex to stop “abusing its dominant position” while removing “unfair competition” from search results. AZAPI says that while Yandex is happy to support other copyright holders as part of the memorandum, publishers are excluded. This means that Yandex’s search results and indeed its other products (Yandex.disk, Yandex.music and Yandex.video) are littered with links to pirated ebooks and audiobooks. Since they are denied access to the voluntary scheme, the publishers have to keep going to court to have pirate sites blocked. However, when sites deploy mirrors to counter blocking, these sites immediately appear in Yandex’s search results, undermining the work done thus far. Mail.ru Allegedly Discriminates Against Some Rightsholders Mail.ru may not be as immediately recognizable in the West as Yandex but its power in Russia cannot be understated. As the owner of social media giants vKontakte, Odnoklassniki (Classmates) and Moi Mir, plus numerous other services, Maril.ru is a major player. As a result, AZAPI accuses the company of abusing its position, including by creating discriminatory conditions for copyright holders. In 2019, vKontakte implemented finger-printing technology that allowed publishers to identify and remove pirated copies of eBooks. While this was a step forward for the publishers, they are now complaining that despite their calls for cooperation, Mail.ru is resisting deployment of the same anti-piracy system on its other platforms. Pirated Content Helps Yandex and Mail.ru Stay Dominant Copyright owners have long accused Internet platforms of indirectly benefiting from piracy. It’s a claim now repeated in AZAPI’s complaints, which allege that Yandex and Mail.ru’s discrimination against publishers help them to maintain both a dominant position and user loyalty. “For many years, illegal content has been an important tool for attracting new users and maximizing the reach of the Russian-speaking audience for social networks, creating a so-called network effect,” AZAPI says. Complaints Under Consideration The Federal Antimonopoly Service has confirmed that AZAPI’s complaints are now under consideration. In a statement, Yandex said that search engines do not know and cannot determine the legal status of indexed content. Mail.ru, on the other hand, said that AZAPI’s complaints do not relate to anti-trust regulations.

welcome to IH, enjoy your stay

welcome to IH, enjoy your stay

Status update The server has been down (SSD fault). A new one was purchased. There are software incompatibilities stopping the site coming back on the new server. The incompatibilities have solutions, all of which could be fixed by tomorrow, or could take a few weeks. The database has a current backup, no data lost.

@dbcjjch0r0us welcome to IH, enjoy your stay and have fun

Google Translation: Changes in the formula for calculating reserve 2 Starting from 1st of December maximum Discount coefficient is increased up to 0.5 for the ratio less or equal to 0.3 main news: changes in formula for reserve calculation

Dear friends, you have noticed that lately things have become difficult in our area and we are constantly forced to change addresses in order to be active and offer you quality entertainment as we have been doing non-stop for the last 6 years. In order to be able to continue everything we do and avoid future blockages it is necessary to become a smaller closed community that will only include members who really want to continue to be entertained by our site, and without those who are here to see just what we do. The only way to do this is with a donation from you so that in the end we can only stay with our friends who will really have chosen us for their fun. The amount of your donation can be 5 euros for 2 months or 10 euros for 5 months or 20 euros for 12 months. The ways you can make your donation are via Paypal (for information and donation via Paypal click HERE) or via Stripe (for information and donation with your card via Stripe click HERE) or via Moneysafe (for information and donation via Moneysafe click HERE) or via Viva eMoney (for information and donation via Viva eMoney click HERE) (Anyone having trouble finding Moneysafe or Viva can contact us HERE.) For general information on how to donate click HERE With your donation you become a Vip member and you can download everything without restrictions. From January 15, 2021 onwards, access to our page will be available only to those who have become Vip members through their donation. Until then, our page will work as it is. Of course all our members who are already Vip and their donation expires after 15/1/211 do not need to do anything. We never thought we would ever have to work this way but unfortunately to be able to ensure that we continue to be open to you is the only way. We know that the times are difficult and we will upset many of our friends with this choice but unfortunately our next choice was to close Magico completely. Thank you for your support all these years. For any question you can send to the contact by clicking HERE

Donation Needed! Hey, We really need you help to keep hdme up and running! Its been several months with close to none donations and we would unfortunately not be able to continue like this... We would really appreciate if members would please help out with donations to keep this site up and running for years to come! We are offering 3x upload credit on all donations over 30Eur. Thanks

Do NOT apply here if you were banned on this tracker before. Apply below , Don't PM me for invites . Add Like . Add + feedback after you get the invite