GFL Global Freeleech will end on Sunday 9th.

The entertainment industry-backed group Digital Citizens Alliance and content protection company NAGRA have published a new study which estimates the pirate IPTV market in the US to be worth a cool billion dollars. So who is making the big bucks from illicit live TV and VOD content and how? In June, TorrentFreak published an article which gave a very brief outline of the pirate IPTV business, in particular how those services are sold and how customers are serviced. The report scratched only the service of what is a highly organized industry, one that over the past several years has developed into a global phenomenon – not to mention a thorn in the side of major entertainment industry groups. A new report from content protection company NAGRA takes a much deeper dive, outlining not only the structure of pirate IPTV supply but also providing estimates on the size of the market in the United States and who’s making money from it. Right off the bat, it’s worth noting that the report is co-presented by the Digital Citizens Alliance, a Hollywood-funded group that has produced highly-critical studies in the past, focusing variously on the so-called ‘cyberlocker’ market and alleged connections between pirate content and malware. US Pirate IPTV Market Estimated to Be Worth a Cool Billion Dollars Titled “Money for Nothing”, the headline figure in the report is that the pirate IPTV market in the United States generates a billion dollars every year. This is the revenue from subscriptions alone and excludes the costs associated with buying hardware (set-top boxes etc) to play the content. NAGRA says that subscription costs vary quite wildly ($2pm to $25pm) but most average between $10pm to $15pm. For the purposes of the study, NAGRA presumes $10pm ($120 per year) for a typical sunscriber. The researchers believe that nine million households in the US currently have a pirate subscription, meaning that when other household residents are accounted for, around 30 million individuals are watching content from these sources, which is roughly nine percent of the population. The stated aim of the report is to determine whether this poses a major threat to legitimate providers, one that “should draw the immediate and sustained attention of policymakers and law enforcement.” How the Pirate IPTV Market is Structured “The consumer’s point of contact with the piracy ecosystem is the PS IPTV [Pirate Subscription IPTV] Retailer. The Retailer advertises to the public, often through social media, driving users to a storefront website where they can download the app, buy a device with the app pre-installed, or otherwise receive instructions on how to access and pay for the services,” the report reads. “Typically, the Retailer purchases its service from a PS IPTV Wholesaler. Often, the Retailer buys ‘credits’ from a Wholesaler to sell a certain number of subscriptions to consumers. The Retailer relies on the Wholesaler’s technical infrastructure and access to stolen content to deliver the service to subscribers. The Retailer spends little in upfront costs, and can purchase additional credits from the Wholesaler whenever its customer base expands.” The report shies away from providing lists of retailers and wholesalers but one well-known service, Rocketstreams, gets a particularly clear and prominent mention, as the image below shows. https://torrentfreak.com/images/rocketstreams-nagra.png “In some instances, a Wholesaler may be a fully integrated operation, gathering the feeds of the stolen channels, developing its own proprietary technology, and using its own servers and software to scrape internet sources for stored movies and television shows for Video on Demand (VOD) services. More commonly, a Wholesaler will outsource or barter for one or more of these functions,” the NAGRA report adds. It’s common knowledge that most ‘wholesalers’ don’t have direct source access to all of the channels they provide to their customers, since the logistics are both complex and expensive. Instead, as the report notes, it’s common for them to work with other ‘wholesalers’ to either share channel packages to fill gaps in their respective offerings or buy the rights to restream them outright. Pirate IPTV Retailers: Costs and Profits Beginning with the customer-facing retailers, NAGRA estimates that in the US alone, they operate via 3,500 storefront websites, social media pages, and stores within online marketplaces. A large retailer could have as many as 100,000 subscribers, NAGRA says, while highlighting YouTube star and former IPTV seller Bill Omar Carrasquillo, a.k.a. OMI IN A HELLCAT, as one of the most high-profile. Categorizing Carrasquillo as a ‘retailer’ could be up for debate, however, since he’s on record as stating that he captured his own content, meaning that he could also be considered a wholesaler under the report’s definition. However, it’s likely that at times he did both and anyway, the main point being highlighted is that he sold to the public and reportedly made millions doing so. Of course, not everyone operates on the scale that Carrasquillo did, a point acknowledged by NAGRA. Due to the low barriers to entry, retailers/resellers may have only a few thousand customers or less and for the study, the company analyzed a retailer with around 5,000 subscribers buying subscriptions at $10pm/$120 pa, generating around $600,000 per year. NAGRA looked at the investment and costs involved (including web development and buying ‘credits’ from wholesalers and arrived at profits of $265,000 per year. https://torrentfreak.com/images/nagr...iler-costs.png “In this example, a PS IPTV Retailer with just 5,000 subscribers can expect to make a yearly profit of over $335,000 on an estimated $600,000 in annual revenues. That’s a robust 56 percent profit margin. Moreover, because this is an illegal business, it is highly unlikely that the PS IPTV Retailer is reporting this income to the Internal Revenue Service, so that profit may be tax-free,” NAGRA notes. Pirate IPTV Wholesalers: Costs and Profits “NAGRA estimates that a large Wholesaler may serve streams — through multiple retailers — to millions of subscribers worldwide. This research is rooted in close scrutiny of these operators. For example, NAGRA assisted the investigation that led to the June 2020 Spanish National Police raid that took down dozens of related PS IPTV brands, serving over 2 million subscribers worldwide. “NAGRA discovered 566 domain names pointing to the raided servers, many of which included terms that suggest that they are used to sell or deliver PS IPTV services,” the report reads. For the purposes of the report, NAGRA looked at what it believes to be a typically-sized wholesaler serving around 30,000 subscribers through retailers, meaning that it had no associated retail costs. NAGRA estimates that a typical wholesaler sells restreaming connections for $6 per subscriber per month, with one connection servicing as many consumers as needed. If the wholesaler sells restreaming connections to 10 other wholesalers, it can generate revenues of $144,000 per year. In respect of retail sales, when offered to retailers/resellers at $4 per credit (1 credit = 1 month subscription), the cost is $48.00 to the retailer. “Assuming the 30,000 subscribers are all acquired through its Retailers, the Wholesaler’s revenue would be ($48 x 30,000) = $1,440,000 per year, bringing the Wholesaler’s total revenue to $1,584,000 per year.” Of course, no business exists without costs and NAGRA provides a fairly detailed overview of its estimates, available as images here and here. The bottom line, however, is that wholesalers are more profitable than retailers/resellers, at least when their setup costs are gradually removed as their business gets into full swing. “Once the service has ramped up and capital expenditures have been amortized, this typical Wholesaler would make a yearly profit of over $1,345,200, with a profit margin of 85 percent, also likely tax-free,” the company adds. Legitimate Companies Are Supporting Illegal Business Over the past several years there have been growing demands for legitimate companies to stop doing business with pirate sites and services. At least in part, the report – which will no doubt be used as a lobbying tool in the months and years to come – aims to put those entities under pressure. Payment processors, credit card companies, hosting providers, CDN companies, website services and social media companies all get a general mention for playing a role, from directly processing subscription payments through to tolerating marketing campaigns that drive traffic to pirate services. Alleged Harms to the Consumer While there doesn’t appear to be any major or fundamental issues with NAGRA’s industry overview, no Digital Citizens Alliance report would be complete without claims of piracy hurting the consumer. Indeed, the report speaks loosely of malware issues in respect of pirate apps being unsafe and some pirates collaborating with “hackers and other bad actors” to steal or hijack data, mine cryptocurrency, and other nefarious activities. However, the section is worth reading closely since most references do not relate to premium pirate IPTV subscriptions, with NAGRA only noting that “PS IPTV operators may, either currently or in the future, engage in the same behavior.” Another observation appears to be targeted at government and lawmakers. It has little to do with piracy but has the potential to throw fuel on the fire in the corridors of power since it links terrorism with IPTV providers. “[O]ut of the hundreds of PS IPTV services monitored in NAGRA labs over recent years, nearly 50 percent included Al-Manar in their channel list. The Al-Manar channel was labeled in 2004 by the U.S. government as a ‘Specially Designated Global Terrorist entity.’ It is banned in the United States and in a number of European countries,” the report reads. Al-Manar, of course, is a Lebanese-based TV station owned and operated by political party/militant group Hezbollah which is not only considered a terrorist group by many countries around the world, but also receives backing from Iran. It’s a small point in the report but is almost guaranteed to make headlines in the future. The full report can be downloaded here (pdf) Source: Torrentfreak.com

Google Translation: The site torrents have exceeded 30,000, and 10,000 karma points were sent to members to celebrate this.

Google Translation: Libertad (Freedom) Dear Onlysceners, it appears that some are wondering about the veracity or not of our security from the site hosting point of view. Even rumors of denouncements reached us by some which were even confirmed. Be calm and reassured, because our site is well hosted in the DMCA IGNORED zone (a country which with a diplomatic arm of honor, does not recognize the laws and rules of the sacrosanct DMCA.) In summary, to all those who believed to have Onlyscene as a trophy, and our dear members and friends, we confirm that the site is very secure beyond that integrated internally in the script and that externally. We are a community open to all but closed for the good of all. We thank you for your confidence and we invite you to come and build your site with us and enrich it with your ideas and uploads. Kind regards.

Often, many people download media through a torrent network and this is a common practice among young people. But sharing or downloading the files online could be an infringement of the copyright law. Many believe that downloading files for personal use doesn’t result in any legal consequences. On the contrary, they do. Filmmakers repeatedly take action against those who illegally download their works and people who lose intellectual property lawsuits have to pay a huge penalty to the plaintiff. Lawsuits associated with online intellectual property issues are a common concern and you may find yourself in serious trouble with such content. Anybody facing a lawsuit related to downloading copyrighted materials or BitTorrent must carefully evaluate their options. Online downloading and BitTorrent lawsuits is a quite complicated legal area. To some people, a settlement is a better option. You may not be able to fathom how serious the matter can be and if you are wondering how can a company prove that you are responsible for the act of copyright infringement, the truth is that anything you do online leaves a footprint. There could be records of downloads in the hard drive, even after the file has been deleted. Some people try to take advantage of various IP addresses or use a public network to hide behind anonymity. No matter how carefully you try to hide your online actions, it is likely that the plaintiff can prove that you downloaded copyrighted content. What you will need to do is fair negotiation and a fair settlement. Defense possibilities in copyright infringement lawsuits Suppose you are not the responsible person, but a member of your family or your friend downloaded any file from your system, this may help you in court. There are many ways to defend yourself or someone you know, who is facing allegations of copyright infringement. The only best way to deal with it is to talk to a national torrent defense attorney who has experience with intellectual property cases. With professional guidance, you can mitigate the harsher impact of a lawsuit in such cases. Another important mention is that if your name gets inserted into the lawsuit then that may appear in online searches that are carried out during employment-related background searches, and that can hinder you from fetching a job in the future on having to explain why you had been a defendant in a movie piracy case. After how many days of downloading can a movie production company sue? Generally, the copyright statute of limitations is three years and you may get a notice for infringement before the period expires. Sometimes a movie company may wait to allow you many downloads so that the cases of infringement against you get racked up and then take legal action. This is done to increase infringement damages and claim more penalty from you. The legal defenses to a piracy allegation A common defense is an unsecured Wi-Fi network where you can show that a third person, maybe your roommate, friend, family member, or a neighbour is responsible for the illegal download through the Wi-Fi. But know that many ISP agreements may show that you could be held responsible for any activity from your account. How long does it take to settle a case? It can take from a few days to a few months. Winding-up In situations where you find yourself facing infringement lawsuits, consult with a reputed national torrent defense attorney to save you from heavy penalties. It is an essential responsibility of a lawyer to represent you rightly and guide you well through the legal proceedings and carry out all paperwork. Do not waste tour valuable time, and find an expert in this niche to efficiently and effectively settle your case.

Movie studios estimate that they lose billions of dollars to digital movie piracy. But a new marketing study from the University of Georgia finds that piracy can actually boost ticket sales in certain situations. The reason: pirates talk. Pirated movies circulated online after their theatrical release saw about 3% higher box office receipts because of the increase in word-of-mouth advertising, according to Neil Bendle, an associate professor of marketing at the Terry College of Business. Bendle is quick to point out that prerelease piracy is still financially damaging for movie studios. But post-theatrical release piracy was connected to more word-of-mouth and higher ticket sales. “We don’t want to give the impression that piracy is a good thing, but there is something to the argument that piracy can increase markets,” Bendle said. “We wanted to find out when that might be the case.” Bendle and his co-authors — Shane Wang of the University of Western Ontario and Shije Lu of the University of Houston — published their findings in a recent issue of Management Science. They analyzed movie ticket sales, piracy rates and crowdsourced movie reviews between July 2015 and June 2017, using data from Russia, where authorities have blocked the popular Pirate Bay torrent since 2015. Pirate Bay was one of the most significant digital piracy sites on the internet for several years between 2010 and 2020 but is now banned in many countries. The research team used activity on the site as a benchmark for piracy rates. They analyzed movie revenues before and during 2015, after a late 2014 law enforcement raid shut down the Pirate Bay website for about a year. During Pirate Bay’s hiatus, word-of-mouth and movie revenues both dipped. “When the Pirate Bay was taken down by the Swedish police, we see a drop in word-of-mouth because people can’t watch these movies on the Pirate Bay,” Bendle said. “And then, we see a contemporaneous decline in ticket sales. When we see that associated fall in word-of-mouth, and then a decline in movie sales, it was a nice bit of evidence that we were moving in the right direction.” Though it sounds counterintuitive, Bendle’s team connected the dips to a decline in movie fans talking about the titles online. With the reduction in online buzz, fewer people were interested in seeing the movies in theaters or streaming them legally. “With post-theatrical release piracy, people who are super keen on it or would have gone anyhow have already gone,” Bendle said. “People who are not going on the opening weekend can be drawn to it by people who have watched the movie and blogged about it. Bloggers don’t have to produce their ticket before they write about it. Pirates can still give a useful, valid opinion for consumers.” Movies only benefitted from the boost in word-of-mouth advertising if the title was pirated and circulated after its theatrical release. Films that were pirated before their release dates saw an 11% decline in their overall revenue, despite increased word-of-mouth. “There’s a key distinction between pre- and post-release piracy,” Bendle said. “We substantiate that prerelease piracy is very bad. It can undermine a film before it comes out.” The takeaway for movie studios is that they should target their anti-piracy efforts to prevent pirated copies of their movies from leaking onto the internet before their theatrical release, Bendle said. “They’ve got limited resources to try to track down movie pirates,” he said. “We’re saying that the best use of those resources should be put toward controlling digital copies of the movie prerelease and not at who’s pirating it after the theatrical release.”

If you are wondering where to watch Formula 1 upcoming Grand Prix, you can come to SportsCult and LiveTV section and watch it on available channels. Regards, SportsCult Team

Tracker's Name:NordicBits (NB) Genre:General Sign-up Link: https://nordicb.org/signup.php Closing date:Soon! Additional information:NordicBits (NB) is a Nordic Private Torrent Tracker for Movies / TV / General Releases.

Change to seed time and bonus We are making some changes to what was posted before. These changes will take effect Sept 1, 2020. Minimum Seeding Time: 14 days (336 hours) - from 3 days Buyout Torrent (zap): 1000 - from 500 In addition to these changes, seedbonus will also be changed. Seedbonus earned for seeding will be .1 per hour, up from .01 per hour, for the first 14 days. After that, seedbonus will be .2 per hour. We trust the increase in seedbonus will help, it is increased with a factor of ten as of 1 Sept. But remember, seeding back time has also changed. We do this to ensure that we have a healthy ratio of seeders and leechers available to everyone, and you'll gain greatly with the increased seed times and larger bonuses. The way HnR works is unchanged, it is explained here Enjoy ABT!!!

Claim BONs for seeding size Apply here if your seeding size is more than 500GB with average seed time 2W 500GB = 1000BON So, if your seeding size is 1.5TB you will get 3000BON and so on.

Server is down.

Google Translation: Return of the Brazilian League Pool Hello guys! Guess who's back, to the delight and despair of some? That's right, our Brazilian League Pool, 2020 edition! Participate now, you can earn many BJ-Points, lose a few more, but the fun is guaranteed. Kind regards, BJ-Share Team

The .CA domain registry and CIPPIC have filed their intervention in the Canadian pirate site blocking appeal. The groups argue that the blocking injunction sidelines the telecoms regulator and disrupts the balance struck by the Copyright Act. In addition, they believe that user rights, including freedom of expression, should be carefully considered. Last year Canada’s Federal Court approved the first pirate site blocking order in the country. Following a complaint from major media companies Rogers, Bell and TVA, the Court ordered several major ISPs to block access to the domains and IP-addresses of pirate IPTV service GoldTV. There was little opposition from Internet providers, except for TekSavvy, which quickly announced that it would appeal the ruling. The blocking injunction threatens the open Internet to advance the interests of a few powerful media conglomerates, the company said. Soon after, the landmark case also drew the interest of several third parties. This included copyright holder groups, which argued in favor of site blocking, but also the Canadian domain registry (CIRA) and the University of Ottowa’s legal clinic CIPPIC, which both oppose the blocking order. CIPPIC and CIRA Intervene Two months ago, the Federal Court allowed these parties to officially intervene but ruled that several of them must pair up to file joint pleadings. This was also the case for CIPPIC and CIRA, which submitted their intervention memorandum this week. The groups argue that the process through which the blocking order was established in Canada was not correct. CIPPIC, for example, says that it disrupts the carefully constructed enforcement regime of Canada’s Copyright Act, by tipping the scale in favor of copyright holders. The Copyright Act specifically allows for enforcement actions against search engines and hosting providers, which can be required to remove infringing content. However, the law doesn’t expand these removal requirements to ISPs. “The absence of any power to control ISP-based dissemination of infringing subject matter at all is, within the scheme of the Act, a users’ right to ISP-based dissemination,” the groups write in their intervention. The blocking injunction changes this, as it potentially restricts the free flow of information by requiring ISPs to block content. Telco Regulator Should Have its Say For its part, CIRA highlights that Canada’s Telecommunications law was disregarded by the court. The domain registry notes that blocking orders are indeed a copyright matter. However, it adds that the far-reaching blocking requirement does require approval from the CRTC, Canada’s telecoms regulator. The Telecommunications Act states that an Internet provider can’t “control or influence” without the CRTC’s approval, which seems to directly apply in this case. “Yet the decision appealed suggests that telecommunications law does not constrain the courts’ jurisdiction or discretion to order blocking without CRTC approval nor allow the CRTC to ‘interfere’ with such an order,” the intervention reads. The intervention further suggests that this case may warrant further scrutiny from the CRTC because the copyright holders (Bell and Rogers) and some of the ISP defendants are owned by the same companies. Foreign Blocking Schemes are Not Without Restrictions On top of the Copyright Act and Telecommunications Act concerns, CIPPIC and CIRA stress that pirate site blocking in other countries isn’t without controversy and restrictions. They are part of detailed statutory schemes, which Canada lacks. In the US, for example, blocking injunctions are an option, but highly restricted. Lawmakers tried to change this several years ago with the SOPA and PIPA bills, but both failed. “As such, ISP-based blocking in the US is contemplated only under an explicit, narrow provision with limited scope. Because American courts have not generally endorsed blocking orders, copyright owners in the United States are asking legislators for statutory reform,” the intervention reads. In Australia, the law was updated to specifically allow for blocking injunctions but these measures come with restrictions too. For example, they can only be issued against foreign sites. Many of these issues have not been considered in Canada. According to the intervening parties, this is not right. Aside from the question of whether this type of enforcement is warranted, more consideration should have been given to the rights of the public, whose freedom of expression is at stake. “[L]aws protecting freedom of expression and regulating common carriage warrant more than a few comingled sentences. Policymakers, legislators, and judges around the world have carefully considered each issue under the laws of their particular jurisdiction. The same level of scrutiny should apply in Canada,” CIPPIC and CIRA conclude. — A copy of the Memorandum submitted at the Federal Court of CIPPIC and CIRA is available here (pdf). Source: Torrentfreak.com

New contest * UFC 252 Donation Drive * Khan-Pr0n Industries Proudly Presents * UFC 252 Donation Drive * * Miocic vs. Cormier 3 * Event Date: Sat, August 15th, 2020 UFC returns...!!! * Your donations and support are needed...!!! * IF you have any spare bonus credits just laying around, maybe consider donating them for this event * Thank You for your support EMPervs...!!! Discuss this post here

^|^ Groups on Asgaard ^|^ We're happy for our groups, here at Asgaard - please support their work QUARK XOR06 PANDEMONiUM Please give them a heads-up in forum - click their image above! - Staff -

Google Translation: 2020-08-06 - The bitHUmen discord server has started in test mode. You can join here: ircinvite.php

Google Translation: Reminder information Small reminder following server concerns of several uploaders in the categories already mentioned, many posts will be without a source. Please do not make a seed request to avoid filling the pm boxes of these people, a mass pm message will be sent when everything is settled. - PC games - Mhd 1080p and 720p - Series Pack SD Thank you for your understanding everyone.

In 2013, Movie2K was one of the largest 'pirate' streaming sites on the Internet generating more traffic in Germany than Twitter. After making arrrests last year, local authorities assisted by the FBI now say they have secured cryptocurrency worth almost $30m. Overall, however, the site's programmer is said to have made 22,000 bitcoins from his work. Just over seven years ago, pirate streaming site Movie2K was riding on the crest of wave after establishing itself as one of the most popular platforms of its type on the Internet. The site was particularly popular in Germany where it was the 19th most popular site overall, generating more traffic than Twitter, Amazon, Apple and PayPal. At the end of May 2013, however, the site shut down without warning, prompting theories of legal pressure. Last November the Attorney General’s Office in Dresden revealed that two men then aged 44 and 37 had been arrested under suspicion of being the former operators of Movie2K. They stand accused of distributing 880,000 copies of movies and TV shows between 2008 and 2013 when Movie2K was closed down. A third man, identified as a 37-year-old real estate entrepreneur, was also detained under suspicion of money laundering offenses. Movie2K According to a new announcement, two of the men have remained in custody since their arrests last year and are now cooperating with the authorities, with interesting results. Large Amount of Crypto Seized But Huge Volumes Already Spent From the information released thus far, it appears that Movie2K generated revenue in at least two ways – regular advertising and so-called ‘subscription traps’. The latter is when individuals sign up for a service and then find it hard or impossible to escape from a supposed contract they didn’t anticipate or were even told about. The Dresden Prosecutor’s Office suggests that schemes were lucrative, with the authorities revealing that they have managed to seize Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash with a total value of 25 million euros (US$29.7m). The site’s programmer reportedly released the crypto haul as a step towards “damage reparation” but it appears that much more income was generated and indeed spent before the police became involved. Authorities say that the site’s main operators started converting cash into bitcoins in 2012 and going by the figures released thus far, the numbers are eye-watering. At Today Rates, Bitcoin Worth More Than a Quarter of a Billion Dollars It’s claimed that the programmer alone received 22,000 bitcoins, which at today’s rates would’ve been worth close to US$257m. Obviously the numbers would’ve been less impressive seven years ago but nevertheless, the site was clearly making plenty of money from its activities. From the fall of 2013 to mid-2016, it’s alleged that the programmer mainly spent his crypto on properties, which were acquired with the assistance of the real estate entrepreneur, who is also cooperating with the authorities. German news outlet Tarnkappe reports that the properties have also been seized. A “clear and reliable identification” of the cryptocurrency was carried out following an investigation by Germany’s Federal Criminal Police Office which received assistance from forensic experts at the FBI.

Website is experiencing connectivity issues due to server overload.

Global Freeleech Mode Activated! 2 days, 23 hours, 11 minutes, 29 seconds.

Google Translation: Latest site changes - mediainfo v0.4.2 - codec problem has been solved: now the system does not add any more codecs, only the first one from the mediainfo file is displayed. - incorrect API return for BD Info was solved too, now the javascript can read the outputs - now the site updates appear in the sidebar in a box for all users.

New contest * F1 iRound 5..!!! * F1 2020 Round 5 F1 fans rejoice...!!! Racing has returned...!!! 70th Anniversary Grand Prix Qualifying: August 8, 2020 - 14:00 (Local Time) Race: August 9, 2020 - 14:10 (Local Time) Fastest lap 2019 race: 1:27.369 * Free4All * * No purchase necessary * * CUM join in the fun...!!! * Discuss this post here

Google Translation: Server reboot notification (Server will restart) The server has been operating continuously for nearly three months, and it will restart after 0:00 on 2020-08-03. There will be a short loss of contact by then. Please be aware, and we wish you health and happiness! Notice: The server will restart after 0:00 on 2020-08-03. Don't worry, it will take several minutes. Good luck and enjoy it!

Google Translation: Explanation on the selection of torrent labels Recently, there are many new friends who have entered the website. Some friends made mistakes in the selection of tags during the seeding process. Here is an explanation: Official: Refers to the resources of the PTHOME official release group, this tag is only applicable to the resources of the PTHOME official group Original: Refers to the original disc purchased and released by yourself, the original disc produced by your own DiY, encoded by yourself, and downloaded from the video platform by yourself, including music, audio books and other resources obtained by other users. Mandarin & Cantonese: Refers to Mandarin dubbing and Cantonese dubbing Official character: Refers to the resources produced by the official subtitle group of this site. This label is only applicable to the resources of the official group of PTHOME Chinese characters: Simplified/Traditional Subtitles DOLBY VISION: Refers to Dolby Vision, different from Dolby panoramic sound, can be self Baidu, divided into single layer and double layer HDR10: Refers to the video that contains HDR10 standard resources, more often found in media info: BT2020, HDR10 compatible HDR10+: Refers to the video containing Samsung HDR10+ standard resources, which are relatively rare, users can do Baidu by themselves Prohibited: It is forbidden to reupload resources from other sites. This label is generally not applicable to resources reuploaded from friend sites to this site. If you are the creator of the resource, please specify separately. Reuploading: Reuploading is prohibited for a limited time, and resources cannot be reuploaded on other sites before the label disappears DiY: This label is only applicable to DiY production of original disc resources First release: This label is only applicable to the first release of Blu-ray original discs, and other resources cannot use this label On request: Refers to the resources released on request [seed area]

Torrent Announcer is offline for the past 13 hours. IRC Service "che" is offline.