Welcome to the penthouse

Welcome to the penthouse

Welcome to the penthouse

Welcome to the penthouse

Welcome to the penthouse

Welcome aboard pirate

Welcome aboard pirate

Welcome to the best torrent forums

Welcome. This is the place to be.

3-4. Always trying out new games, but they only seem to be fun for few hours.

loves badgers

Not really general, but tv tracker for shows from the commonwealth. Mostly UK, AUS, NZ

Torrent tracker sites are spreading like wildfire. Everyone is thinking they'll start a tracker, attract some people and make a bit of money from donations. Stick the the old trusted sites. It's impossible for any new site to become competition to them.

I don't know about torrent tracker, but there are many sharing piracy uploaded on filehosts, mainly mega.nz The search in telegram is pretty good, just think about search words a bit and you can find whatever it is you're after.

Where did they lose it? Maybe if they look around a bit better they might find it. So when theaters are full, they are overcharging the customers, everything is good. They didn't lose any money, they just did not make as much as in their happy days. Cut the bonuses and hefty managerial salaries and minimize the loses. But you can bet they still gonna share big bonuses despite the fell in revenue. Greedy bastards.

Don't know about best, but you find those on every porn tracker. Try pornolab as i thinks its open for registration. There are also forums specialized in classic adult content, movies, magazines etc. But they upload on filehosters, and some filehosts are easy, some will be difficult to download from without premium account.

It's the good news a lot of you have been waiting for, UHDbot is back on IRC and spitting out announces for all of you auto-downloaders. Bot functions seem to vary from user to user almost like it's picking favorites, but the key features are up and running. Give all the salutation to cr0nus for taking the time out of his busy life to help us all out. On behalf of everyone at UHDBits, Thank You for everything that you have done!!!! The IRC channels have been reverted back to bot invites instead of a channel password exactly how the trusty old wiki laid out. So set an IRCkey and come join the rest of us. For everyone who just wants to use the announce channel, make sure you select the channels you want when you set your IRCkey so your bot doesn't spam the main channel with invites. Regards, UHDbits.org Team!

@blackcrow Ok, I'll take if no one else will

The collection included 1605 DVDs, VHS tapes, toys, and other paraphernalia. A Michigan man has successfully sued his parents for $75,000 (£55,500) for destroying his extensive porn collection. In a ruling concluded on 16 December by U.S. District Judge Paul Maloney, Beth and Paul Werking will have to pay their son David, 42, as much as $75,000 for destroying the porn. Paul and Beth Werking of Grand Haven, Ottowa, were sued in 2018 by their son David Werking after they destroyed his collection of 1605 DVDs, VHS tapes, toys, and other paraphernalia and materials in 2018. In the lawsuit, the younger Mr Werking states that the value of the items is approximately $25,000 (£18,500), but with his lawyer stating that Mr and Mrs Werking should pay their son triple the value of the items "which [he] believe[s] are warranted given the wanton destruction of the property. ”He continued by stating “This was a collection of often irreplaceable items and property.” Paul Werking apparently confessed to destroying the collection in an email: “Frankly, David, I did you a big favour by getting rid of all this stuff,” MLive.com reported in September 2019. Throughout this communication, his father accused David Werking of owning incestuous and paedophilic porn amongst his collection, according to The Holland Sentinel in Michigan. A later court ruling found this to be false, stating all of the content owned by Mr Werking to be legal. David Werking filed the suit against his parents in federal court April 2019, accusing his parents of illegally destroying a large amount of pornography that he had left behind at his parents’ house when he moved out after a brief time living with his parents following his divorce in August 2017. He now lives in Indiana.

Twitter’s ‘Super Follow’ feature might allow more paid pornographic content to rival OnlyFans There is an oft-repeated myth that, as the Avenue Q song famously says, “the internet is for porn”. Figures as high as 30 per cent of the world wide web was said to be pornographic content – in fact, that number is less than one sixth of that. But one way that the internet has changed the pornographic industry is making it more personalized. Social media, and the rise of services like OnlyFans where users pay a subscription to a particular adult entertainer, has turned these performers into stars with millions of followers paying to see their content – and letting the companies that support them take a percentage of profits. As that trend continues, Twitter has announced “Super Follows”. The feature means that creators will be able to charge a subscription to view their tweets and posts. They also get access to a “Communities” tool that works like Facebook groups. Twitter made no reference to adult content in its announcement, and has not given guidance on what rules sex workers will face if they make use of the new feature. But Twitter is already notable among the major social networks in its permissive approach to pornography, and those users who use it to promote adult content are likely to embrace new ways of monetising that content. Twitter’s move into this space means it competes with OnlyFans, but also with Patreon and Substack – the company recently purchased newsletter service Revue to better achieve that goal. Creators often use their Twitter accounts to grow their followings and then monetise those users on other platforms, but the new changes are designed to keep at least some of that money with Twitter. The same dynamic has happened for explicit content. Adult performers get almost all of their traffic from social media, converting followers and subscribers into paid supporters, often by sending fans from more public accounts on sites like Twitter to private and paid-for ones like OnlyFans. (OnlyFans has become known for its association with sex workers, but makes its platform available to anyone. While it is used by everyone from musicians to chefs, it has become popularly known as a way for adult entertainers to sell their content to subscribers.) Twitter is also distinct from other prominent platforms in that it does allow pornographic content, albeit not in the profile photo or header image. Facebook, and its subsidiary Instagram, does not allow nudity that shows genitals or female nipples – a decision that has been repeatedly criticised for sexism. YouTube, similarly, bans “explicit content meant to be sexually gratifying”, and Tumblr made headlines when its pornography-supporting community saw their content removed (with one-fifth of users leaving the site as a result.) Reddit, by contrast, does allow pornography with various subcommunities for different kinks, and has no plans to ban it. TikTok, while banning explicit content, still has vast amounts of pornographic content and is also becoming more popular with adult entertainers. But there is a disparity of scale; YouTube and Facebook have significantly more users than TikTok, Reddit, and Twitter combined and with relatively little competition in the social media space, that means adult entertainers have relatively few outlets to share their content. Does that mean there is going to be an influx of NSFW-content on Twitter? For adult entertainers, it depends on how it is implemented. “I would like to see a clean interface that is user friendly and am very excited for this new feature. Twitter seems to be one of the last social media platforms where adult content is (somewhat) accepted”, Annabelle Rogers, an adult performer with nearly 88,000 followers, told The Independent. “For me personally, Twitter is the best way to promote myself so if I could monetize off my audience there it would be fabulous. It also helps me by not having to direct my audience to a new site and away from Twitter while simultaneously eliminating those who lurk around just to watch my free teasers.” Twitter could also offer more support for up-and-coming porn performers, especially following criticisms of OnlyFans’ actions with celebrity entertainers. In September 2020, the actress Bella Thorn signed up OnlyFans – gaining 50,000 followers and earning $2m within a week – but caused a backlash for selling $200 photos where she claimed she would be nude. Thorn, however, was not, and thousands of subscribers demanded refunds. In response, OnlyFans placed a cap on the previously unlimited amount that creators could charge, but many smaller performers said that they would lose a hefty chunk of the money they make, as they were unable to take custom requests from their viewers which would pay them more. “OnlyFans only seems to support celebrities and influencers”, Rogers added, and as long as Twitter’s options worked without bugs, payment issues, and had a supportive customer service she could see many joining it. Savannah Solo, an adult performer with 177,000 followers on Twitter, told The Independent, also said that OnlyFans “seem to not be using much of that to make quality improvements for creators and users.” OnlyFans did not respond to The Independent’s request for comment before time of publication. However, simply existing is not enough for Twitter to siphon off prospective OnlyFans users. The app has been repeatedly condemned as a “toxic place” for women, especially women of colour, and although the company is taking steps to change that it is unclear whether it is ready to deal with the influx of issues that might come with increased pornographic content. Moreover, OnlyFans is already a well-established name with features in place to protect both users and performers. “It’s become almost normal to subscribe to OnlyFans creators as a go-to method for consuming Adult Content. There’s a trust level with those consumers that many people just don’t have with other adult sites, because OnlyFans doesn’t market as an adult site”, Solo told The Independent. “They also age verify all Creators AND consumers, which gives me peace of mind that minors aren’t subscribing to my page,” she added. “I would have to be 100 per cent sure that it would not jeopardize the main side of my account, as this is my main source of advertisement and traffic. I also don’t think I have the energy to build another backlog on here. On my OnlyFans I have over 700 posts with close to 2000 pictures and videos, and it would take me forever to build that up on a new platform. Managing one OnlyFans page and inbox is already a full time job.” Twitter did not answer questions from The Independent about what percentage it would take from payments, the support it was going to provide against harassment, or its community features. It also did not comment on shadow-banning, a practice whereby the company makes hashtags or handles difficult to search for without knowing the specific terms. Twitter claims that it does not do this, but does “rank tweets and search results”, according to a blog post. “There still seems to be a confusing line between what is and isn’t accepted on Twitter’s platform and I would like there to be more clear rules”, Rogers said. “Our purpose is to serve the public conversation. As a part of that work, we are examining and rethinking the incentives of our service – the behaviours that our product features encourage and discourage as people participate in conversation on Twitter”, Twitter told The Independent. “Exploring audience funding opportunities like Super Follows will allow creators and publishers to be directly supported by their audience and will incentivize them to continue creating content that their audience loves. Super Follows is not available yet but we’ll have more to share in the coming months.” For new performers, there are also other factors deciding what platform they choose to upload content to. Natalie Kensington, an adult entertainer with 2,400 followers on Twitter, said that new tools like PocketStars – an OnlyFans competitor built by adult star Elle Brooke – that are designed with an awareness the difficulties sex workers themselves face are preferable. “Twitter is obviously an amazing marketing and promotion tool, and OnlyFans has the advantage of being the most well-known in terms of NSFW content”, Kensington told The Independent, but “it’s much better for a sex work platform to be built by sex workers as we have the first-hand knowledge of exactly what level of work goes into it.” Brooke agrees, but told The Independent that she is “keeping an eye” on the development. “I think OnlyFans, Twitch and Patreon should be concerned. My gut feeling at this stage is that it is going to be catered for influencers, celebrities and online personalities such as gamers [but] if all the stars align, it could be highly convenient for sex-workers that predominantly promote through Twitter.” However, she said her company’s ability to develop the necessary tools for performers without the potential concerns from investors is a significant advantage, adding that “if there is one thing running PocketStars has taught me, it’s that our industry is far from ‘normalised’ within the corporate world!”

The group calls for more transparency around streaming revenues and the company's practices Protests were held outside Spotify offices worldwide yesterday (March 15) in a fight for greater transparency within the streaming service and a move towards a user-centric payment model. The protests came from The United Musicians and Allied Workers Union (UMAW), who started a new campaign titled ‘Justice at Spotify’ last October, which, among other goals, is demanding that the platform raise its average streaming royalty from $.0038 USD to a penny per stream for all artists. Since the campaign was launched, it has gained over 28,000 signatures from artists including Thurston Moore, King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard, Frankie Cosmos, Deerhoof, Julianna Barwick, JD Samson, DIIV, Alex Somers, Zola Jesus and more. In a statement regarding the protests, UMAW organiser Mary Regalado said: “Spotify has long mistreated music workers, but the pandemic has put the exploitation into stark relief. Regalado, who also plays in punk band Downtown Boys, added: “The company has tripled in value during the pandemic, while failing to increase its payment rates to artists by even a fraction of a penny. Musicians all over the world are unemployed right now while the tech giants dominating the industry take in billions. Music work is labour, and we are asking to be paid fairly for that labour.” Earlier this year, a petition set up by musician Evan Greer asked Spotify to permanently triple its royalty rates for artists following the loss of earnings that arose due to the coronavirus pandemic. In April, PRS director Tom Gray shared data collected by The Trichordist showing how many streams artists need to earn minimum wage on each streaming platform. Musicians promoting their music on Spotify would need 3,114 plays to earn one hour of UK Minimum Wage (£8.72). In August, Spotify’s Daniel Ek was widely criticised by musicians after the CEO said it “wasn’t enough” for artists to “record music once every three to four years”. In the original interview, Ek said there was a “narrative fallacy” about the idea that Spotify doesn’t pay enough for artists to live on. “It is about putting the work in, about the storytelling around the album, and about keeping a continuous dialogue with your fans,” he said. “I feel, really, that the ones that aren’t doing well in streaming are predominantly people who want to release music the way it used to be released.” Over the past few months, an inquiry at the UK’s Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS) has been looking into the financial impact of streaming on artists, with musicians such as Radiohead‘s Ed O’Brien, Elbow‘s Guy Garvey and Nadine Shah telling MPs that unfair streaming payments were “threatening the future of music” during the first hearing in November.

Director Jeff Fowler reveals production is underway for Sonic the Hedgehog 2, the highly anticipated sequel to last year's surprise hit. Production is underway for Sonic the Hedgehog 2. The first film released last year, and was a surprise hit. Making over $300 million worldwide, fans liked Sonic's design and Jim Carrey's portrayal of the nefarious Dr. Robotnik. Sonic the Hedgehog 2's release date is next April. Anticipation is certainly high for Sonic the Hedgehog 2. The first film did a good job establishing the blue hero's universe. Sonic grew up on a more fantastical planet before being warped to Earth. Thus, the major aspect of the story was establishing Sonic living on the Earth. The other pivotal story element was Dr. Robotnik's descent into Sonic's greatest nemesis. At the end, Robotnik has completed his transformation into the villainous Dr. Eggman, mustache and all. However, the biggest thing the film introduced was Tails, opening the door to a wider universe of characters. Everything was set in place for a big followup. Sonic the Hedgehog 2 was officially titled last month, complete with a familiar sounding tune for longtime fans of the games. Aside from Tails having a role, nothing is known about Sonic the Hedgehog 2's story. In the past, Fowler has discussed why certain game elements were not included in the first movie. Knuckles and Super Sonic were not included so that the biggest emphasis could be on establishing Sonic and Dr. Robotnik. With that out of the way, Fowler will have a golden opportunity for Sonic the Hedgehog 2. Tails appearing is already a big deal, but it will be interesting seeing how else the sequel expands on the mythos. Sonic the Hedgehog 2 is in a very unique position after its popular predecessor. As an introductory film, it's hard to find major faults with Sonic the Hedgehog. The big question is how it will handle Tails as it looks to expand the worldbuilding. Video game movies may always have a stigma against them, but another successful Sonic movie can help to continue to turn the tide. Plus, Sonic the Hedgehog would have likely made more at the box office if not for the COVID-19 pandemic. With Sonic the Hedgehog 2 over a year away, and presumably with cinemas returning to more normalcy, everything should be in place for an even bigger hit than last year's movie.

Disney's live-action Cruella, played by Emma Stone, gets a makeover turning her into DC's Harley Quinn in incredible fan art by Bosslogic. New fan art shows Emma Stone’s Cruella undergoing a makeover and turning into DC’s Harley Quinn. Disney’s Cruella, helmed by Australian director Craig Gillespie, debuted its trailer in February 2021, giving a glimpse into Stone’s punk interpretation of the One Hundred and One Dalmatians iconic villain. The movie was supposed to come out in December 2020, but it was delayed and rescheduled for a May 28, 2021 theatrical release. Set in London in the 1970s, Stone will portray Cruella de Vil before she became the evil designer obsessed with Dalmatian skin, as seen in the 1961 hit Disney animated film and other adaptations. The movie also stars Emma Thompson as Baroness Von Hellman, de Vil's employer before she reinvents herself as the infamous criminal known as "Cruella." In August 2019, months before filming wrapped, a picture of Stone as Cruella next to three adult Dalmatians was shown at Disney’s D23 Expo. This first look at the character showed Cruella’s signature black-and-white hairstyle, and it also offered a glimpse of Jasper (Joel Fry) and Horace (Paul Walter Hauser), the two thieves who also featured in the original Disney animated movie. Artist and art director Bosslogic on Instagram showed what could happen if Disney mixed its characters with DC ones. Stone’s Cruella was given a little twist by turning her already punk-rock look into that of another beloved villain, DC’s Harley Quinn. The fan art shows Stone rocking Quinn’s original black-and-red hairstyle and different-color eye make-up. The picture went viral online, with many praising the artist under the post and others defining the fusion of Cruella and Harley Quinn as "Disney’s Joker." Check it out below: Some commenters even went the extra mile, suggesting Stone be cast as Poison Ivy in a future DC Comics film. There are many similarities between Disney’s Cruella and DC’s Harley Quinn. Both of them are strong women who, through the course of the film, realize their true potential. For this reason, it makes sense to draw parallels between the two supervillains. There’s already hype surrounding Stone's performance in Cruella, and this incredible art only increases the anticipation for the Disney live-action prequel. Stone’s magnetic performance in the trailer, from her look all the way to her British accent, hints at what the audience can expect from the film. It remains to be seen how it will stack up against previous displays, such as Glenn Close's iconic performance in 101 Dalmatians (1996). Either way, it's clear Cruella has already inspired artists and will hopefully charm audiences as well when it release in May.

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre movie by Fede Alvarez will act as a direct sequel to Tobe Hooper's original 1974 film, featuring an older Leatherface. The upcoming ninth Texas Chainsaw Massacre film is confirmed to feature the original Leatherface as an Old Man and act as a direct sequel to the original movie. The original Tobe Hooper-directed film was released in 1974 and quickly became a slasher classic. Texas Chainsaw Massacre followed a group of young twenty-somethings stuck in Texas when a cannibalistic family besets them. The late Gunnar Hansen originated the role of Leatherface in that film. The Texas Chainsaw Massacre franchise has spawned numerous films, including various remakes and sequels. The last film, Leatherface, was released in 2017 and acted as a prequel origin story to the iconic villain. Before that, Texas Chainsaw 3D was released in 2013 and served as a direct sequel to the original film. Legendary Pictures bought the franchise's rights in 2018 and announced a reboot alongside talks of a possible television series. Fede Alvarez (director of modern horror classic Don't Breathe and the highly effective Evil Dead remake) produces the new Texas Chainsaw Massacre. He told Bloody Disgusting that the new reboot would serve as a direct sequel to the original film. It will also feature the original Leatherface, albeit a little bit older. To emulate the original's feel, Alvarez said that the film is prioritizing practical visual effects when it comes to the gore and murders. It is a direct sequel, and it is the same character. It is old man Leatherface. Everything is classic, old school gags. A lot of the approach that we had with Evil Dead – never VFX, to do everything on camera. It’s a very old school approach to filmmaking. Vintage lenses… it’s very similar to the original film. Alvarez's comments certainly seem to hint at the studio's hopes of repeating the success of the 2018 Halloween sequel. That film also retconned the numerous sequels that came out after the 1978 film to create a direct sequel to the original that featured iconic scream queen Jamie Lee Curtis. The Halloween reboot successfully produced two highly anticipated sequels, Halloween Kills and Halloween Ends, set for release in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Unfortunately, little else is known about the reboot at this point, including just who will be taking over the role of Leatherface for Hansen. David Blue Garcia is directing the film with Eighth Grade star Elsie Fisher taking on the lead role. The choice to reboot the series and tie the new movie directly into the original is smart. Leatherface has become a mainstay of the horror genre. Reviving him for a new generation of horror fans could breathe new life into the Texas Chainsaw Massacre franchise after years of lackluster follow-ups that failed to capture the magic of the original.