FILM-PALEIS | GENERAL| 2020 Review Name: FILMPALEIS URL: https://film-paleis.me/ Genre: General Ratio Requirements: Ratio Based Signup: Closed/Invite Only Maintaining Ratio: Medium Bonus System: Available Banned Countries: NA _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ |--- DESCRIPTION ---| Film-Paleis is a small Dutch tracker for movies, TV & general releases. They have 11k torrents with various categories like movies, TV-series, e-books, PC softwares, games. Their request section reads “We are a Dutch Tracker and all Films / Series must therefore be provided with clear Dutch Subtitles” which clearly tells that most of their releases comes with Dutch subs. They have a good collection of movies including non-mainstream/ not so popular contents. Most of their torrents have seeds and speed is good. |--- HOME ---| |--- BROWSE---| |--- REQUESTS ---| |--- FORUM---| |--- RULES---| |--- FAQ---| |--- BONUS POINTS ---| |--- RATINGS ---| Speed: 7.5/10 Pretimes: 7/10 Content: 6.5/10 Community: 6.5/10 Overall: 6.5/10

Site is down. The server is not responding.

�� Opening IRC Server | Closing Discord Server We are closing the discord server to move primary chat into the integrated "Chatbox" on the start page. In addition we are opening an IRC Server for support and secondary chatting option. Check the link for details and a HowTo for everyone who's new to IRC. --------------- IRC Server Join our IRC Server! All infos and a guide for those who are new to IRC can be found here --------------- We are about to slowly close this discord server due to privacy concerns (discord collects a lot of information and stores sent messages). For a tracker with a high priority in privacy, this is no longer a service we want to offer to our users. As an alternative to discord, we recommend the built in Chatbox and our new and anonymous IRC Server.

Tracker Maintenance is complete. Site is back online.

add [Have] IPT invite

...

bring up my post

bring up my post

The Hollywood studios of the MPA plus Amazon and Netflix have obtained an injunction against 'pirate' IPTV provider Crystal Clear Media. The action comes in response to a lawsuit filed in the US last month, in which the companies alleged copyright infringement of thousands of movies and TV shows. In addition to serving cease-and-desist notices on various players involved in the supply of pirated movies and TV shows, the Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment often takes matters a step further. Mostly via copyright infringement lawsuits filed in the United States, the global anti-piracy coalition has accused several providers of acting outside the law, hoping to shut the services down and achieve a damages award or significant settlement. Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Against CCM During August, ACE sued pirate provider Crystal Clear Media (CCM) under its business name TTKN Enterprises LLC. It also named Todd and Tori Smith of Florida as defendants, identifying them as the operators of CCM. A key feature of the case is the emphasis placed on so-called VOD content. While CCM and other providers tend to provide thousands of live TV channels, they also delivered so-called 24/7 channels (which reportedly offered “marathons of Disney’s movie Frozen II and Warner Bros.’s Harry Potter movie collection”) along with other mainstream movies on-demand. According to the complaint, CCM knew this was a problem after ACE successfully shut down the Vaders IPTV platform last year. However, instead of backing away, CCM continued to provide access to video-on-demand while cultivating a network of resellers dedicated to servicing existing and prospective CCM customers. Lawsuit Demands Injunctive Relief and Damages The ultimate goals of the lawsuit against CCM are to win a permanent injunction to take it offline while obtaining a substantial damages award. With statutory damages running to $150,000 per title infringed, significant amounts are on the table. In the first instance, however, the ACE members – including Disney, Paramount, Amazon, Netflix and others – sought a preliminary injunction with a number of key elements. That was comprehensively achieved via an order handed down by Judge George H. Wu in a California district court this week. Preliminary Injunction Addressing the plaintiffs’ claims under 17 U.S.C. § 106 of the Copyright Act, Judge Wu ordered the defendants not to directly or secondarily infringe any of the rights owned or controlled by the plaintiffs in respect of their copyrighted works. While that effectively prevents the CCM service from operating, the Judge also responded to requests from the plaintiffs to render unusable a wide range of domain names previously deployed by the IPTV provider. “Except to as requested by Plaintiffs, Defendants shall not transfer or otherwise relinquish control to the domains: mediahosting.one, crystalcleariptv.com, ccmedia.one, ccbilling.org, cciptv.us, ccreborn.one, ccultimate.one, superstreamz.com and webplayer.us,” the order reads. Along those same lines, the Judge further ordered GoDaddy, One.com and their respective registrars to disable access to the above domains while preventing them from being modified, sold, transferred or deleted. The WHOIS information of the domains must also be preserved, including all contact and similar identifying information. Additionally, the listed domain companies, plus all others receiving notice of the order, must preserve all evidence that may be used to identify the people that used the domains in question to infringe copyright. Injunction Also Targets Resellers of the CCM Service The original complaint alleges that CCM operated an “extensive and expanding” reseller network. These people bulk-bought “credits” from CCM that were converted to subscriber login credentials when purchased by customers. “Defendants’ reseller program plays a pivotal role in their infringing enterprise. Defendants’ resellers market and promote CCM as a substitute for authorized and licensed distributors,” the lawsuit claims. After hearing that this expansion poses an exponential infringement threat, Judge Wu agreed that the network of sellers must also be prevented from operating. With that, he granted permission for the entertainment companies to complete service of process on anyone acting in concert with the defendants, including resellers of the service. “Upon receipt of a copy of this Order, these individuals and entities shall cease directly or secondarily infringing any of Plaintiffs’ Copyrighted Works through any means including publicly performing, reproducing, or otherwise infringing in any manner…any right under 17 U.S.C § 106 in any of Plaintiffs’ Copyrighted Works by continuing to provide access to Defendants’ service or by any other means,” the Judge added. While CCM is already believed to be out of action, the above paragraph indicates that if resellers of CCM are currently offering other IPTV packages from a different supplier that also offer illegal access to the plaintiffs’ content, they must stop doing that too after receiving a copy of the order.

Freeleech 24-hour freeleech from (various users) ******!! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23 hours 39 minutes 25 seconds Freeleech

Owner Just an update on the owner. Just finished my 6 treatments for bladder cancer. I will know if this worked October 19th then I can deal with my prostrate cancer. I am very grateful for all the prayers my friends, since I am still kicking they have helped. Love all of you B***

Europe’s creative industry has criticised the European Commission’s consultation on new EU copyright rules for departing from the original directive agreed last year and being unworkable. The new copyright directive, which marked the first overhaul in two decades, had pitted artists and news publishers against tech companies, internet activists and consumer groups and aimed to provide fair compensation for the bloc’s $1 trillion (781.7 billion pounds) creative industries and its 11.7 million employees. A key provision, Article 17, backed by the creative industry would require Google-owned YouTube, Facebook’s Instagram and other sharing platforms to install filters to prevent users from uploading copyrighted materials. The platforms can be sued for making copyright-infringing content available to the public, even where it has been uploaded by their users. Critics however say filters are costly and could lead to erroneous blocking. The Commission sought feedback from the online platforms and rights holders on how to apply Article 17, with the consultation ending on Thursday. “In its consultation paper, the Commission is going against its original objective of providing a high level of protection for rightsholders and creators and to create a level playing field in the online Digital Single Market,” said 23 trade bodies representing publishers, music industries and film and TV producers in a joint letter to EU digital chief Thierry Breton and seen by Reuters. Sporting event organisers, TV and radio broadcasters, distributors, photo agencies, cinema operators and Telefonica were also among signatories to the letter. They complained that the proposals were incompatible with the original directive and unworkable. “The proposed guidance amounts to an attempt to rewrite the Directive and amend EU copyright law without due legislative process,” the trade bodies said. They urged the Commission to take their concerns into account when drafting its final guidance. The Commission said it “was mindful of the letter, context and purpose of Article 17”. It said its consultation document proposes a balanced approach on how to avoid infringing content on the platforms while safeguarding legitimate uploads by users, such as uses under an exception to copyright.

· OVPN came out of the legal case against the Rights Alliance as a winner. · The plaintiffs couldn’t prove that OVPN logs any user data whatsoever, let alone PII details. · The court ruled that the Rights Alliance couldn’t support their data request with evidence, so it’s invalid. The Stockholm court handling the case of the Rights Alliance going after the real identities of the current Pirate Bay operators turned the request down. The case is now closed, and the VPN provider can celebrate the fact that it came out victorious. OVPN will also get a payment of $12,300 from the plaintiffs to cover legal fees and representation costs. But before we go to the rationale of the court’s decision, let’s do a quick overview of how things got to this point. Back in June 2020, the Rights Alliance who represented filmmakers ‘Svensk Filmindustri’ and ‘Nordisk Film’ filed an injunction against Swedish ISP ‘Obenetwork,’ who allegedly provided the Pirate Bay with its main IP address. The anti-piracy group hoped the whereabouts of the servers belonging to the legendary pirating platform would be revealed, but the ISP responded by saying the case lacks even a basic understanding of how things work. Obenetwork told the court that “The Pirate Bay” was actually using an IP address operated by OVPN.se, a Swedish VPN provider. As it happens, OVPN keeps no logs about its clients, has no hard drives on its servers, and doesn’t even have its own Address Space numbers. The clients are essentially purchasing a public IPv4 add-on using cryptocurrency – so nobody, including OVPN, knows who they are. That said, there’s no practical method to link any IP address with a person or a location, as everything is essentially masked. The Rights Alliance hired a VPN expert to convince the court that OVPN must hold at least traces of useful data, but the expert started himself doubting the existence of logs on the company’s systems. So, the case was going one way, and that way was to dismiss the data requests. As the court stated: It is not possible on the basis of the statements, which contain a number of uncertainties, to draw any definite conclusions about OVPN’s access to the information to which the application for an injunction relates. Nor does any other investigation arrive at such conclusions. Applicants’ application for an information injunction should therefore be rejected. OVPN celebrates the fact that not even a highly motivated legal team with VPN experts could prove that they store any data, so there’s some positive publicity for them here. The Rights Alliance, on the other side, has been disappointed by the court’s ruling and already stated that they will continue to act against companies who sell their services to copyright infringers. They still accuse OVPN of making money from what they characterize as “criminal activities,” and they feel sad that they are getting away with it, this time at least.

Freeleech Pool Tipped! ***** has triggered the Freeleech Pool! The following film(s) have been randomly selected and are now freeleech for the next 48 hours. Here Thanks to users who donated to the pool. Now go drop some of your own orbs into the next pool!

bring up my post

Downtime due to server issues.

Freeleech ended and Hit &Run implemented and active from now on if you dont seed you wont be able to download

Hello HDS, As the forum thread states, 4K4U is looking for a few 1080p Bluray remuxers, 4K 2160p remuxers, 4K UHD HDR x265 encoders and lastly a few 1080p/720p x264 guys or gals. OK, so before you read any further let me state this upfront. I'm not going to teach you how to create a REMUX nor will I teach you to encode. All that information is in the HD Lounge Discord the Discord that is part of HDS. What I WILL DO, is give you pointers, direction and help when you find yourself stuck. You have to put in your own work. So some background on 4K4U, I've taught some of the lads on this site OMEGA RG - Aroma - another RG I won't name and some lads that our in other RG's around the tracker world. I know my shit, I'm very specific about the layout and content, I'm anal as all fuck. Why? Because, if were going to do it, were going to do it right! Naming procedures, posters, descrptions, nfo, BD Info Scan, and sources. If you want to get with a REMUX RG that 'Actual' know what there doing. Be warned, I'm not babysitting or coddling anyone! You our required to put in your own work! If your interested hit me back via PM ONLY. Cheers

Hong Kong citizens are rushing to get a VPN - before unprecedented levels of surveillance begin due to China's newly passed security law. The new law makes it illegal for pro-democracy protesters to engage in any acts that are considered separatist, subversive, or in collusion with foreign forces. As a result, citizens of Hong Kong could face arrest, imprisonment, and even extradition to China if they are found guilty. The frightening new law is a massive blow for freedom of speech, making it dangerous for citizens to express dissenting opinions online. With a VPN for Hong Kong, citizens can encrypt their internet data. This will prevent ISPs from monitoring your web visits on behalf of the government and enable you to bypass any censorship enforced by the Chinese Communist Party. With freedom of speech under threat and surveillance set to become more Draconian, Chinese influence in the region could make it much harder to get a VPN in Hong Kong. That is why it is a good idea to act now to get a subscription to a VPN while you still can. What are the best VPNs for Hong Kong Below we have listed the best Hong Kong VPN services. Check out our detailed VPN reviews or scroll to the next section for information about these services. ExpressVPN - The best Hong Kong VPN. It is lightning fast and has strong encryption and great security features to keep you safe. Surfshark - This is the cheapest Hong Kong VPN on the list. It keeps zero logs and you can use it on an unlimited number of devices. Private Internet Access - Really is a private VPN. It offers a great arsenal of privacy features and has proven its no logs claim. CyberGhost VPN - This is an easy to use VPN with apps for Android, iOS, Mac, and Windows and it offers strong encryption. VyprVPN - It has been audited by a third-party to prove it's secure and private and it has slick apps on all major platforms. Due to the massive political tensions within Hong Kong and the talk of pervasive online censorship, it is vital that you use a secure VPN service. For a Hong Kong VPN to be secure, we recommend that it has the following features: Obfuscation technology - Obfuscated servers are needed to bypass firewalls in countries that block websites. DNS leak protection - Check out our DNS leak protection guide for more information about this. kill switch - This drops your connection when your VPN fails so no one can access your data. OpenVPN encryption- Military-grade encryption that will ensure your data is kept secure. All the services we recommend in this guide offer these features and much more. If you'd like more detailed information about these services, scroll down below this list for the provider summaries or click through to the provider's website.

VPN provider OVPN has emerged victorious from legal action initiated by movie companies hoping to get closer to the operators of The Pirate Bay. After a back-and-forth process, the court agreed with OVPN's claims that as no-logging provider, it had no useful data to hand over. Early June, movie companies Svensk Filmindustri and Nordisk Film, supported by anti-piracy partner Rights Alliance, embarked on legal action in an effort to track down the operators of The Pirate Bay. Early Background After obtaining information from Cloudflare, Rights Alliance later filed a lawsuit in Sweden against a local ISP, requesting an information injunction that would compel it to hand over information relating to The Pirate Bay. This request stumbled and was thrown out early on when it was discovered the IP actually belonged to VPN provider OVPN. Soon after, OVPN became the focus of attention, with Rights Alliance demanding that it should disclose the same information about The Pirate Bay. OVPN Fightback Begins In its initial response, OVPN made clear that as a no-logging provider, it couldn’t provide any useful information about its alleged customer, The Pirate Bay. The company also argued that no law exists in Sweden that compels a VPN provider to keep logs. The company won the first stage of the legal battle by asserting that with no information to hand over, an information injunction compelling it do so would be completely futile. Furthermore, no evidence had been produced by Rights Alliance or the movie companies stating that it did hold any relevant information. In response, Rights Alliance hired a VPN expert who concluded, from his knowledge of how other VPN providers operate, that OVPN would probably had some information to hand over. However, when presented with more evidence, he later appeared to reconsider his position. Court Sides With OVPN, Believes No-Logging Claims Following a decision handed down Thursday at the Patent and Market Court in Stockholm, OVPN has now emerged victorious. Given the complexities of the case, the decision appears to have been a relatively simple one for the Court. Essentially, if a party denies it has access to specific information – in this case information related to OVPN’s alleged customer The Pirate Bay – it falls upon the applicants to provide sufficient evidence that the data is available to be retrieved. The statements and evidence provided by the plaintiffs failed to show that, according to the Court. “t is not possible on the basis of the statements, which contain a number of uncertainties, to draw any definite conclusions about OVPN’s access to the information to which the application for an injunction relates. Nor does any other investigation arrive at such conclusions,” the decision reads. “Applicants’ application for an information injunction should therefore be rejected,” it concludes. OVPN’s David Wibergh welcomes the Court’s decision which seems to have turned on the provider’s no-logging policies and, as detailed in our earlier reporting, early deletion of server backups. “Rights Alliance and their security experts have not been able to prove any weaknesses in OVPN’s systems that could mean that logs are stored. OVPN therefore wins the information injunction as our statements and evidence regarding our no-log VPN policy have not been disproven,” Wibergh says. “OVPN is one of very few VPN providers that have had their no logs claims proven in court. OVPN is the only Swedish VPN provider that has proven that no logs are stored,” he adds. Rights Alliance Disappointed But Will Maintain the Pressure Rights Alliance says it is disappointed by the Court’s decision, noting that The Pirate Bay “causes harm to rights holders” so it is in their interests to hide to continue their business. “In this case, they have used a Swedish service provider to hide and it is sad to see that they have got away with it, this time. Here, the VPN service has made money by hiding criminal activities and that can not be right. “We will continue to act where we see companies selling their services to infringers,” says Rights Alliance chief Sara Lindbäck. As a result of their loss in this matter, the movie companies represented by Rights Alliance must also pay OVPN’s legal fees, equivalent to around US$12,300. “OVPN is the VPN service to use when privacy matters, and we firmly believe that privacy always matters,” Wibergh adds. “As such, our entire infrastructure is built with privacy & security as the core principles. OVPN does not log any activity when connected to our VPN service. Therefore, we do not know who is connected to our service, what they are doing or when they did it.”

Piracy is a criminal act and the Government of India has finalised some punishment for the same. As per the Cinematograph Act of 2019, if any individual is found recording a film without the written consent of the producers, he or she can face a jail term of up to 3 years and slapped with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs. Madras Rockers is one of the websites that allow users to downloaded pirated films for free. The portal is mainly responsible for leaking Tamil and Tamil-dubbed films before their release or as soon as they hit theatres. The site often releases films in full HD quality. What sets Madras Rockers separate from other sites is that it lures people by providing them with the latest Tamil films to download. It displays an extensive list of the latest leaks on their homepage. The website has a subsection for movies by Tamil actors and a separate section for Tamil-dubbed movies. Films leaked by Madras Rockers Some of the movies leaked by Madras Rockers include, Kanni Maadam (2020), Darbar (2020), Karuthukalai Pathivu Sei(2020), Godfather (2020), Mafia (2020), Maanik (2019), Dabangg 3 (2019) Oh My Kadavule (2020), Naan Sirithal (2020) and World Famous Lover (2020). What is government doing to stop piracy? Since piracy is illegal in India, the government has banned sites like Madras Rockers. However, the platform manages to work around the ban by routinely changing its domain name extensions and keeps leaking a lot of movies from a number of film industries illegally. Film lovers often support piracy as they get to watch the latest movies online at free of cost. However, this has led to a decrease in the number of audiences that go to movie theatres to watch newly released films. Penalty against piracy law If a person knowingly supports piracy or downloads copyrighted movie from Madras Rockers, it could be considered a criminal act. Under the piracy law, the person can be convicted for a jail term and also given a fine between Rs 50,000 to Rs 2 lakhs, depending upon the seriousness of the offence.

Bollyshare has been known for sharing almost every Hollywood blockbuster movies. From Parasite to Avengers: Endgame, Bollyshare has leaked them all. Some of the other films leaked by Bollyshare include Ford v Ferrari, Once Upon A Time In Hollywood and The Lion King. What all is available on Bollyshare? More recently, the website has been convicted of leaking Bird of Prey, Joker and Dolittle. Not only Hollywood, Bollyshare has leaked its fair share of Bollywood flicks as well, including films like Love Aaj Kal, Jawaani Jaaneman, Dabangg 3 and Pagalpanti. What makes this Bollyshare even more dangerous in terms of piracy is the fact that the website is also responsible for providing free content from OTT platforms such as Netflix, Amazon Prime, Hulu, Hooq and Ullu. Bollyshare has also leaked shows like Tarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashma and The Kapil Sharma Show, among others. The internet has proven to be a boon for users who love to binge watch movies without having to pay for them. Purchasing a ticket and watching a film at the theatre, or subscribing to an OTT platform is perhaps the right way to go about to help all the people who have spent hours behind making such cinematic experiences. However, a lot of people prefer to download the free latest Hindi, English and other language movies rather than paying for them. Sites like BollyShare cater to such clientele. A comparatively newer site on the internet, Bollyshare has managed to attract a lot of traffic thanks to its unique and simple interface which is easy to use. The site also offers South Indian films on their website in original audio in HD quality for free download. The website's interface has different section for Bollywood that enables viewers to download Hindi content with ease. It offers many streaming and downloading qualities, ranging from 360p, 7800 to HD and 1080p. BollyShare has two subdivisions in different URL names, BollyFilma.com and FreeMovies.wap. While the former provides the site with an extensive list of Bollywood, Hindi Dubbed and Punjabi movies, the latter offers newly-released Hollywood, Tollywood and other vernaculars. What if you are caught for piracy? For those downloading films from Bollyshare, they need to be aware that piracy is a criminal offence. The Cinematograph Act of 2019 can make you spent up to 3 years in jail with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs. On the other hand, the piracy law in India states that downloading a copyrighted film from the website or helping someone else download content can lead to the punishment including a jail term for six months (first time offence) to three years, with a fine between Rs 50,000 and Rs 2 lakhs.

The Lithuanian Radio and Television Commission (LRTK) has moved to stop the illegal distribution of TV programmes on the internet. In a statement, it says that it has decided to issue mandatory instructions to network providers to block the website sharavoz.com, which undertakes such activities. It adds that the owner of the site has failed to notify it of its intention to distribute TV content over the internet and so is violating the requirements of the Law on Public Information. LRTK applied to the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court for a permit to issue mandatory instructions to network operators to block the site. The permit was issued on August 27 and network operators now have five days to do so following the receipt of the instructions. Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)

GazelleGames (GGn) 24 hours Freeleech and 3 days 2x upload is on.

24 hours Freeleech and 3 days 2x upload is on.