@ginmy i am applying for the PixelCove invites. Thanks Fingers crossed

1 x Icetorrent Invites GiveAway 1 . Click Like 2 . Reply this post for apply, Don't forget to mention me @rehabmc 3 . Please do not PM me, 4 . Do not apply if you were locked on this tracker before this 5 . I will ask proofs 6 . Give me +1 Positive Feedback after you received the invite.

Hi @bluevelvet I apply for LosslesClub invites , thanks

Hi @Ulquiorra I wish to apply for the invite please. Rep+Like added. Thanks.

@cryterion I would like to apply for this wonderful giveaway. I have been looking for this tracker for a very long time for my personal use. Thank You, Kind Regards

Tracker Name: ExoticaZ (YourExotic) Genre: PORN Review : exoticaz.to | EcZ | Adult | 2018 Review Sign Up Link: https://exoticaz.to/register Closing Time: N/A Additional Information: ExoticaZ (YourExotic) is a Private Torrent Tracker for XXX

Tracker Name: Homeporntorrents Genre: PORN Review (If Any Sign Up Link: http://homeporntorrents.com/register.php Closing Time: N/A Additional Information: HomePornTorrents (HPT) is a Private Torrent Tracker for AMATEUR XXX

Tracker Name: Cheggit Genre: PORN Review (If Any Sign Up Link: http://www.cheggit.me/register.php Closing Time: N/A Additional Information: Cheggit is a Private Torrent Tracker for XXX

Tracker Name: Mac-Torrents (Applications) Genre: Other Review (If Any Mac-Torrents.me | MT | Mac Only | 2018 Review Sign Up Link: https://mac-torrents.me/register.php Closing Time: N/A Additional Information: Applications open ATM.

welcome to Invitehawk.

welcome to Invitehawk.

pm @Ethan he can help you

Thank you for making this giveaway

Tracker Name: Bithorlo (BHO) Genre: General Review (If Any Sign Up Link: https://www.bithorlo.info/signup.php Closing Time: Soon! Additional Information: Bithorlo (BHO) is a HUNGARIAN Private Torrent Tracker for MOVIES / GENERAL Bithorlo is the internal tracker for multiple release groups

The rules for Canada's notice-and-notice regime will change following the passing of C-86, the Budget Implementation Act. Moving forward, rightsholders will not be allowed to send copyright infringement notices for ISPs to pass onto their customers, if they contain a direct or indirect offer to settle. The development effectively ends Rightscorp-style business models in Canada. In several countries around the world, notably the United States, Canada, and the UK, rightsholders and their agents send copyright notices to alleged infringers. In most cases, recipients are accused of downloading and sharing copyright-infringing content using BitTorrent. The notices contain details of the alleged offense along with instructions to cease-and-desist. These notices, sent to Internet users’ ISPs, are regularly passed on to the subscriber. However, some companies targeting US and Canadian citizens augment their notices with text indicating that a cash settlement is required, ranging from just a few dollars to several hundred. Many users who see these demands pay up but these notices are unusual in that the original sender has no idea who the subscriber is. This means that some recipients ignore them, with no further consequences. While the practice operates largely unhindered in the US, over in Canada (where there is a so-called notice-and-notice regime) there has been considerable opposition since its inception in 2015. ISPs, who have to bear the brunt of the administrative burden, have also cried foul, with TekSavvy recently describing the content of some notices as akin to “scams and spam“, with Bell noting that it would like to see an end to the copyright-notice settlement model. Back in October, it became clear that the ISPs and other opponents had strong government backing with the publication of a new bill that would prevent the activity from continuing. Bill C-86, the Budget Implementation Act, has now received royal assent, so there will be some big changes in the Great White North. Section 41.25 of the Copyright Act is now amended with the addition of the following; (3) A notice of claimed infringement shall not contain: (a) an offer to settle the claimed infringement; (b) a request or demand, made in relation to the claimed infringement, for payment or for personal information; (c) a reference, including by way of hyperlink, to such an offer, request or demand; and (d) any other information that may be prescribed by regulation. The text is pretty straightforward, in that it prohibits demands for settlement in the notices themselves or on a third-party site where such a demand may also be available. This is important since some notices contain hyperlinks that not only lead to demands for cash but also undermine subscriber privacy with the use of tracking code. The news was welcomed by Canadian law professor Michael Geist, who notes that notices that do not meet the new standards can be withheld by local ISPs without them facing penalties. However, Geist also cautions that the new amendments contain no punishments for anti-piracy companies that fail to follow the rules. “The key remaining question is whether ISPs will crackdown on non-compliant notices. Since there is no penalty associated with sending non-compliant notices, subscribers are dependent upon ISPs carefully reviewing notices to ensure that they only forward those that fully comply with the law,” Geist notes. Considering their earlier opposition, however, it seems unlikely that TekSavvy, Shaw, Rogers, and Bell will have many problems with withholding non-compliant notices.

New Zealand's National Party has won its appeal against Eminem's publishers. The party was previously ordered to pay $600,000 for infringing the copyrights of Eminem's track "Lose Yourself" in a 2014 election spot. But, on appeal, the damages amount was reduced to $225,000. In recent years, New Zealand has been the center stage of the largest copyright battle in Internet history; the criminal prosecution of Megaupload’s Kim Dotcom. While this case remains ongoing, one of the country’s largest political parties is facing ‘infringement’ problems of its own. In 2014 Eminem’s publisher took the National Party to court over alleged copyright infringement of the rapper’s track “Lose Yourself” in an election campaign video. At the time, the party was led by then Prime Minister of New Zealand John Key, who was seen as Dotcom’s nemesis. In common with the Megaupload case, the dispute between the National Party and Eminem’s publishers wasn’t resolved swiftly either. The initial court proceedings made it clear that the National Party didn’t simply use the song without paying for it. It actually sought professional advice before starting the campaign and licensed a track called Eminem Esque, which they then used in the campaign ad. The party hoped to avoid more expensive licensing fees by using the knock-off song, but the court previously ruled that the similarities between Lose Yourself and Eminem Esque are so significant that it breached copyright. Last fall the High Court sided with Eminem rightsholders Eight Mile Style and Martin Affiliated, ordering the National Party to pay $600,000 in damages. However, neither side was happy with this figure and both appealed. The court based the damages amount on a “hypothetical license fee” but the National Party argued that the number was too high. At the same time, Eminem’s rightsholders wanted to increase the scale of the damages. This week, the Court of Appeal sided with the National Party. In its verdict, the court notes that the party crossed a line. “On the evidence, the proposition the National Party turned a blind eye to the risk of copyright infringement or saw a risk and embarked on a reckless course of conduct with respect to that risk was not sustainable,” the decision reads. However, at the same time, the Court of Appeal agrees that the original damages amount was too high. It, therefore, reduces the damages amount from $600,000 to $225,000. There is no question that the music breaches Eminem’s copyright, but the baseline figure that was initially used should have been lower. The track would only be used for 11 days and targeted a limited audience. “The advertising message was only relevant to a relatively small population, and the minimum baseline concept negated proper consideration of a territory-related license,” the court explained in a summary, shared by the NZ Herald. The lowered damages amount is a clear win for the National Party. Whether Eminem’s rightsholders have plans to challenge the Court of Appeal’s decision is not known at the time of writing.

welcome to Invitehawk..

Welcome to this awesome community

welcome to Invitehawk.

welcome to Invitehawk.

welcome to Invitehawk.

Rules: 1 . Click on Like this post & Add Rep. 2 . Reply this post for apply, don't forget to mention me @rehabmc 3 . Give me +1 Positive Feedback after you received the invite 4 . I may ask for proofs 5. Only the deserved one will be selected

Rules: 1 . Click on Like this post & Add Rep. 2 . Reply this post for apply, don't forget to mention me @rehabmc 3 . Give me +1 Positive Feedback after you received the invite 4 . I may ask for proofs 5. Only the deserved one will be selected

uppppppppppp

@Ulquiorra I would like to apply for this wonderful giveaway. I have been looking for this tracker for a very long time for my personal use. Thank You, Kind Regards